Alternative theory: Why was Pete hired?
Comments
-
“22 points stood between a Natty in 2017 and a Rose Bowl win over tOSU in 2019” -Pump, 2035
-
? The grave has room For 1 more. Allow me. Actually Stalin. Commies love silencing those like you.Baseman said:“22 points stood between a Natty in 2017 and a Rose Bowl win over tOSU in 2019” -Pump, 2035
-
I'm still here, bitch!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer. -
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch. -
He's going to Greece.haie said:
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch. -
Loser.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dear. Wasnt it cool just to see purple sidelines in Pasadena again.
-
Dennis_DeYoung said:
One of the reasons I think it's so important for bottom up pressure on Pete and the program is we know it is never going to come top down. But astonishingly, in any business - your core constituents matter a lot. It's hard to ignore people who spend a lot of time involved with what you do criticizing you.
I believe in Pete, but coaches have to evolve and improve.
In saying that I want Pete to bring in top 10 recruiting classes and play talent, I'm not saying I want him fired. That binary is peddled by Doogs who are more afraid of failure than they want success. Pete is amazing. I love him.
I think if Pete thought long and hard about all the issues we discuss he would mostly come down on the side of the half-brains.
However, change is really hard. Pete always preaches about 'getting out of your comfort zone' - and those things are usually mantras because they are very personally important to the person espousing them. Pete has a massive comfort zone and Jen and the Cauce are NOT going to push him outside of it.
Yes it stings to lose to Ohio State, Penn State, Auburn, USC and Bama looking outclassed athletically... but dispersed over 3 years of 'we're just happy to be here' it doesn't sting that bad.
Everyone here knows at Bama you have top shelf athletes and top shelf effort and execution. At Clemson, Ohio State, Georgia and Oklahoma you have the same. What separates us from those teams is the way we carry ourselves.
Right now, Clemson is basically - if you take our program and put it through Oregon's marketing lens. I think all of us would appreciate that.
The more criticism of the program the better in my view. I'm HAPPY to trumpet our accomplishments and I think playing for Pete is most likely one of the best CFB experiences you could ever have.
But one of the failures of modern Dawg fans is to strive for being the best. Everything is about avoiding failure and everything we do is measured by how close we are to 0-12. That was true under Ty (4-9 was FOUR wins after all!) and it's true now. People want to act like things have changed, but that 'at least it's not XYZ' is still strong and alive in our fanbase. We just have new numbers to plug into the XYZ that makes the argument look better without actually being better.
The focus should always be: We are a great university in a great city with a great stadium, great tradition and a great fanbase. No one is close in the north and we should be one of the top 10 teams in the country every year.
If in the next 10 years we average being ranked 8th at season's end I can live with that.
What I can't live with is this 'IT'S BETTER THAN SARK/TY, DO YOU WANT TO GO BACK???'
Fuck that. Grab the fucking brass ring and have some fucking ambition. This is fucking America. Try to be the best or fuck off. It's one of the things our culture really got right.
I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them.
OUT OF ALL PLACES this place should know that. In the modern landscape of CFB we are set up to do GREAT things. We need to actually want them instead of being afraid it's all going to unravel.
Scared money don't make.
Everything about our BS fan base is scared money. Let's be the fucking best. The end.
This means something.
I agree. -
If you have the talent to go toe to toe with top 10 teams in a bowl game, but cant do it until garbage time, that is NOT good coaching. That's when you got your ass handed to you by the other coach. Penn State and Ohio State were good teams. But neither one of them had a defense that anyone was scared of. Except Jake Browning I guess.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Everything you said is true. Against PSU and OSU espacially UW was outclassed but weathered the storm and came back. That takes good coaching.creepycoug said:
I'll let Race score that one, as he tends to be less emotional and biased about game analysis than I.PostGameOrangeSlices said:LIPO.
We were in the playoffs year 3 and half the team (defense) belonged, with far less talented players.
Respectable-ish losses the past 2 years in NY6 games.
I have to believe Pete will break through eventually because I really doubt another coach is going to do better.
Pete is winning at a historic clip. He just needs to break through on the big stage. With the way recruiting is trending I have to think he will. The offense is the concern, same as it was the past 2 years.
There were elements in all three losses of UW having its ass handed to it for a stretch. I gave Pete all the credit in the world for the half-tim adjustments that kept the PSU score respectable. But in all three, for a significant stretch of the game, UW looked outclassed.
You can't just concede an entire half of football to really good and athletic teams. So that's on somebody. I'll let you decide who, because I don't know.
And the other thing that provides important context is that he's winning at an historic clip in a conference that is now a shell of its former self. It is what it is; don't twist. I'm not playing the "USC is down"' or "Oregon is down" game. Most of the conference is what Oregon State and Cal used to take care of on their own.
UW also plays overly conservative initially which is bad coaching. The players seem intimidated.
The Pac 12 stuff is also valid.
I still dont see another alternative that has us in this position. Pete is the guy and hopefully he improves.
Of the three NY6 games, UW was ready to play in exactly one of them. And then Saban said enough was enough after the first possession and clamped down. Game over. I'd say that was the best coaching job however as the talent disparity between Bama and UW was yuuuge. Much more than 17 pts. The other two games, UW wasn't ready to play.
Pete was known as the ultimate long term prep coach at BSU, with his BCS bowl wins and success in first games of the Season against Oregon twice and Georgia if I remember correctly. However that obviously hasnt carried over to UW. Why? Who knows. Pete's BSU teams weren't more talented than his teams at UW. One thing is clear however. Pete is a very good coach but He isn't 92-12 good. Only Saban, Urbs and now Dabo are. Pete has had the advantage of a historically shitty Pac 12 to beat up on by being the only team that can play tough hard nosed Football. Pete is a guy that can win Pac 12 titles and MAYBE can eek out a Rose Bowl win should the Big 10 send someone to the CFP in a non Rose Bowl year for the CFP . However, I don't see him making another CFP run himself. While the schedule screams 12-1 this year, Petes Dawgs always find a way to lose 1 or 2 games that they have no business losing. Until that doesn't happen, the Rose Bowl is the ceiling. -
You are who your record says you aresalemcoog said:
If you have the talent to go toe to toe with top 10 teams in a bowl game, but cant do it until garbage time, that is NOT good coaching. That's when you got your ass handed to you by the other coach. Penn State and Ohio State were good teams. But neither one of them had a defense that anyone was scared of. Except Jake Browning I guess.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Everything you said is true. Against PSU and OSU espacially UW was outclassed but weathered the storm and came back. That takes good coaching.creepycoug said:
I'll let Race score that one, as he tends to be less emotional and biased about game analysis than I.PostGameOrangeSlices said:LIPO.
We were in the playoffs year 3 and half the team (defense) belonged, with far less talented players.
Respectable-ish losses the past 2 years in NY6 games.
I have to believe Pete will break through eventually because I really doubt another coach is going to do better.
Pete is winning at a historic clip. He just needs to break through on the big stage. With the way recruiting is trending I have to think he will. The offense is the concern, same as it was the past 2 years.
There were elements in all three losses of UW having its ass handed to it for a stretch. I gave Pete all the credit in the world for the half-tim adjustments that kept the PSU score respectable. But in all three, for a significant stretch of the game, UW looked outclassed.
You can't just concede an entire half of football to really good and athletic teams. So that's on somebody. I'll let you decide who, because I don't know.
And the other thing that provides important context is that he's winning at an historic clip in a conference that is now a shell of its former self. It is what it is; don't twist. I'm not playing the "USC is down"' or "Oregon is down" game. Most of the conference is what Oregon State and Cal used to take care of on their own.
UW also plays overly conservative initially which is bad coaching. The players seem intimidated.
The Pac 12 stuff is also valid.
I still dont see another alternative that has us in this position. Pete is the guy and hopefully he improves.
Of the three NY6 games, UW was ready to play in exactly one of them. And then Saban said enough was enough after the first possession and clamped down. Game over. I'd say that was the best coaching job however as the talent disparity between Bama and UW was yuuuge. Much more than 17 pts. The other two games, UW wasn't ready to play.
Pete was known as the ultimate long term prep coach at BSU, with his BCS bowl wins and success in first games of the Season against Oregon twice and Georgia if I remember correctly. However that obviously hasnt carried over to UW. Why? Who knows. Pete's BSU teams weren't more talented than his teams at UW. One thing is clear however. Pete is a very good coach but He isn't 92-12 good. Only Saban, Urbs and now Dabo are. Pete has had the advantage of a historically shitty Pac 12 to beat up on by being the only team that can play tough hard nosed Football. Pete is a guy that can win Pac 12 titles and MAYBE can eek out a Rose Bowl win should the Big 10 send someone to the CFP in a non Rose Bowl year for the CFP . However, I don't see him making another CFP run himself. While the schedule screams 12-1 this year, Petes Dawgs always find a way to lose 1 or 2 games that they have no business losing. Until that doesn't happen, the Rose Bowl is the ceiling.
I agree in the bowl games but not much of the rest.
I think Pete can get back to being an 11 win top 10 team AND win an Apple Cup and a shitty Pac 12
Might want to examine why your cuogs can't come within 20 of him -
I covered that, but you already knew that.RaceBannon said:
You are who your record says you aresalemcoog said:
If you have the talent to go toe to toe with top 10 teams in a bowl game, but cant do it until garbage time, that is NOT good coaching. That's when you got your ass handed to you by the other coach. Penn State and Ohio State were good teams. But neither one of them had a defense that anyone was scared of. Except Jake Browning I guess.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Everything you said is true. Against PSU and OSU espacially UW was outclassed but weathered the storm and came back. That takes good coaching.creepycoug said:
I'll let Race score that one, as he tends to be less emotional and biased about game analysis than I.PostGameOrangeSlices said:LIPO.
We were in the playoffs year 3 and half the team (defense) belonged, with far less talented players.
Respectable-ish losses the past 2 years in NY6 games.
I have to believe Pete will break through eventually because I really doubt another coach is going to do better.
Pete is winning at a historic clip. He just needs to break through on the big stage. With the way recruiting is trending I have to think he will. The offense is the concern, same as it was the past 2 years.
There were elements in all three losses of UW having its ass handed to it for a stretch. I gave Pete all the credit in the world for the half-tim adjustments that kept the PSU score respectable. But in all three, for a significant stretch of the game, UW looked outclassed.
You can't just concede an entire half of football to really good and athletic teams. So that's on somebody. I'll let you decide who, because I don't know.
And the other thing that provides important context is that he's winning at an historic clip in a conference that is now a shell of its former self. It is what it is; don't twist. I'm not playing the "USC is down"' or "Oregon is down" game. Most of the conference is what Oregon State and Cal used to take care of on their own.
UW also plays overly conservative initially which is bad coaching. The players seem intimidated.
The Pac 12 stuff is also valid.
I still dont see another alternative that has us in this position. Pete is the guy and hopefully he improves.
Of the three NY6 games, UW was ready to play in exactly one of them. And then Saban said enough was enough after the first possession and clamped down. Game over. I'd say that was the best coaching job however as the talent disparity between Bama and UW was yuuuge. Much more than 17 pts. The other two games, UW wasn't ready to play.
Pete was known as the ultimate long term prep coach at BSU, with his BCS bowl wins and success in first games of the Season against Oregon twice and Georgia if I remember correctly. However that obviously hasnt carried over to UW. Why? Who knows. Pete's BSU teams weren't more talented than his teams at UW. One thing is clear however. Pete is a very good coach but He isn't 92-12 good. Only Saban, Urbs and now Dabo are. Pete has had the advantage of a historically shitty Pac 12 to beat up on by being the only team that can play tough hard nosed Football. Pete is a guy that can win Pac 12 titles and MAYBE can eek out a Rose Bowl win should the Big 10 send someone to the CFP in a non Rose Bowl year for the CFP . However, I don't see him making another CFP run himself. While the schedule screams 12-1 this year, Petes Dawgs always find a way to lose 1 or 2 games that they have no business losing. Until that doesn't happen, the Rose Bowl is the ceiling.
I agree in the bowl games but not much of the rest.
I think Pete can get back to being an 11 win top 10 team AND win an Apple Cup and a shitty Pac 12
Might want to examine why your cuogs can't come within 20 of him
But here ya go again.
Pete has had the advantage of a historically shitty Pac 12 to beat up on by being the only team that can play tough hard nosed Football
I'm gonna step out and let y'all be butthurt TBS'ers. -
This bored made me forget I just watched the best 3 year stretch of Husky football anyone on this bored (Except Race, he was a freshman in Gloomy Gil's first year) have ever seen in person that didn't result in crippling sanctions.
We should be much better.
Losing Bowl games sucks. I get it. That was a long 3 hours getting out of the Fiesta Bowl parking lot and Rose Bowl parking lot. And I'm one of the guys on this bored that actually hates money and goes to at least 9 games a year. And I'm a poor to begin with. But if anyone here actually thinks UW has any interest in ever becoming the kind of program that can compete yearly with the Alabama's and current Clemson's of the world, you have not paid attention to anything Seattle lately. It doesn't coincide at all with what UW upper campus views themselves as. Right or wrong, that's what it is.
So for me, the option is, bitch about Pete's shortcomings, but realize that it is never going to get any better and just shoot for the hook and ladder from Pettis or the onside kick at the end of the RB end up working once in a while and enjoying the fact I haven't had to see a home loss in person for over 2 seasons. Yes, doogish I know, but it kinda is what it is. -
But its a historically great CUOG team who only needed to win a home game to win the historically shitty Pac 12
Congrats on sounding like a doog telling Oregon their run was only due to a bad Pac 12 -
-
salemcoog said:
If you have the talent to go toe to toe with top 10 teams in a bowl game, but cant do it until garbage time, that is NOT good coaching. That's when you got your ass handed to you by the other coach. Penn State and Ohio State were good teams. But neither one of them had a defense that anyone was scared of. Except Jake Browning I guess.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Everything you said is true. Against PSU and OSU espacially UW was outclassed but weathered the storm and came back. That takes good coaching.creepycoug said:
I'll let Race score that one, as he tends to be less emotional and biased about game analysis than I.PostGameOrangeSlices said:LIPO.
We were in the playoffs year 3 and half the team (defense) belonged, with far less talented players.
Respectable-ish losses the past 2 years in NY6 games.
I have to believe Pete will break through eventually because I really doubt another coach is going to do better.
Pete is winning at a historic clip. He just needs to break through on the big stage. With the way recruiting is trending I have to think he will. The offense is the concern, same as it was the past 2 years.
There were elements in all three losses of UW having its ass handed to it for a stretch. I gave Pete all the credit in the world for the half-tim adjustments that kept the PSU score respectable. But in all three, for a significant stretch of the game, UW looked outclassed.
You can't just concede an entire half of football to really good and athletic teams. So that's on somebody. I'll let you decide who, because I don't know.
And the other thing that provides important context is that he's winning at an historic clip in a conference that is now a shell of its former self. It is what it is; don't twist. I'm not playing the "USC is down"' or "Oregon is down" game. Most of the conference is what Oregon State and Cal used to take care of on their own.
UW also plays overly conservative initially which is bad coaching. The players seem intimidated.
The Pac 12 stuff is also valid.
I still dont see another alternative that has us in this position. Pete is the guy and hopefully he improves.
Of the three NY6 games, UW was ready to play in exactly one of them. And then Saban said enough was enough after the first possession and clamped down. Game over. I'd say that was the best coaching job however as the talent disparity between Bama and UW was yuuuge. Much more than 17 pts. The other two games, UW wasn't ready to play.
Pete was known as the ultimate long term prep coach at BSU, with his BCS bowl wins and success in first games of the Season against Oregon twice and Georgia if I remember correctly. However that obviously hasnt carried over to UW. Why? Who knows. Pete's BSU teams weren't more talented than his teams at UW. One thing is clear however. Pete is a very good coach but He isn't 92-12 good. Only Saban, Urbs and now Dabo are. Pete has had the advantage of a historically shitty Pac 12 to beat up on by being the only team that can play tough hard nosed Football. Pete is a guy that can win Pac 12 titles and MAYBE can eek out a Rose Bowl win should the Big 10 send someone to the CFP in a non Rose Bowl year for the CFP . However, I don't see him making another CFP run himself. While the schedule screams 12-1 this year, Petes Dawgs always find a way to lose 1 or 2 games that they have no business losing. Until that doesn't happen, the Rose Bowl is the ceiling.
That's a lot of words to say "I'm a butthurt WSU fan" -
Imagine being scared of little mediterrannean menhaie said:
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch. -
Salem and I are not going to take this insult sitting down.RaceBannon said:But its a historically great CUOG team who only needed to win a home game to win the historically shitty Pac 12
Congrats on sounding like a doog telling Oregon their run was only due to a bad Pac 12
We're going to think of a really good come back. Until then:
-
The Pac 12 is something like 5-20 in bowl games during your run.RaceBannon said:But its a historically great CUOG team who only needed to win a home game to win the historically shitty Pac 12
Congrats on sounding like a doog telling Oregon their run was only due to a bad Pac 12
-
Your?
The Pac has been top heavy for as long as I have been alive. Most leagues are.
Better to be the top than the bitter loser
Idaho and Montana used to be in the Pacific Coast league. And WSC -
Are you replying to a cloud again???RaceBannon said:Your?
The Pac has been top heavy for as long as I have been alive. Most leagues are.
Better to be the top than the bitter loser
Idaho and Montana used to be in the Pacific Coast league. And WSC -
I'm a Swede dude. (Blond locks dude, where u been?)haie said:
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch. -
So a black Swede with long blonde locks. Got it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I'm a Swede dude. (Blond locks dude, where u been?)haie said:
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch. -
Pumpy is a man of many looks1to392831weretaken said:
So a black Swede with long blonde locks. Got it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I'm a Swede dude. (Blond locks dude, where u been?)haie said:
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch.
Handlebar mustache for the older women
Flowing blonde locks and a clean shave for the younger ones
Maybe pm @IrishDawg22 if u want to get a bit more dialed in -
Just depends on my mood. Pup changes his look as often as his look in shoes. 365 different ones per year. The shoes make a man...and chicks love a man with a keen eye for zapatosPitchfork51 said:
Pumpy is a man of many looks1to392831weretaken said:
So a black Swede with long blonde locks. Got it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I'm a Swede dude. (Blond locks dude, where u been?)haie said:
Let me guess. You aren't going to Denmark, Sweden, Germany, or Norway.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're showing how stupid you really are haie. Now back to class. You'll get it when you watch more than 3 years of husky football you little putz. I got a few days b4 I hit Europe. Allow me to put you in same grave as Baze b4 I departhaie said:
I mean you use the same hypothetical shit to excuse Lambo. I'm talking about 1 non con game against fucking Northwestern.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Did Shaw get to playoff haie? Loflhaie said:
Stanford's in the playoff if not for a fucktarded loss to Northwestern at the beginning of the year. Be better.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is fucking retarded. PETE GOT US TO THE FUCKING PLAYOFF. AS IN WE PLAYED IN IT. WITH JAKE FUCKING BROWNING.haie said:Pete was hired to get us to replace Stanford in the Pac 12 pecking order. Good enough to win the conference, not worth discussing for the playoffs.
The sooner you fucktards realize this the faster you'll join me for another beer.
You're going to Spain or France like a bitch.
Handlebar mustache for the older women
Flowing blonde locks and a clean shave for the younger ones
Maybe pm @IrishDawg22 if u want to get a bit more dialed in -
The last two NY6 bowl losses were not respectable. Nobody watching those games thought we had any chance. You’re a doogPostGameOrangeSlices said:LIPO.
We were in the playoffs year 3 and half the team (defense) belonged, with far less talented players.
Respectable-ish losses the past 2 years in NY6 games.
I have to believe Pete will break through eventually because I really doubt another coach is going to do better.
Pete is winning at a historic clip. He just needs to break through on the big stage. With the way recruiting is trending I have to think he will. The offense is the concern, same as it was the past 2 years. -
T’s and P’sRaceBannon said:
My parents are dead.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Hi Race;) you upset your parents are like Bazey's. Not their fault. You should have worked harder, studied harder, realized graphic design was a dead end. Now let's get to 'FUCK OFF". Maybe an English emphasis with your Associates of Arts degree from green river would have given you more ammunition in a forum argument with Pup. "FUCK OFF" just wont do;)RaceBannon said:
FUCK OFFpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Saban's and Swinney's dont have academic standards Baze (kinda like your parents).
The sooner you realize UW is in the UCLA, Northwestern, ND, CAL, Stanford, Vandy conference be proud. UW the best of the bunch. It's why Pete has built for life. More than just football Baze. Being you didnt go to college, or a have a job you wouldnt understand. This is as good as UW football will ever be, under Pete. Academics matter here, as well as they should. I love it:) get used to it. Stalin should as well
Run this loser
