Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jacob Eason has a great day

245

Comments

  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,598 Swaye's Wigwam
    Swaye said:

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
    Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.

    WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??

    That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???

    Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.

    Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.

    Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.

    God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.

    Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.

    Fuck you you brain dead monkey.


    I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.

    I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.

    Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
    Never show weakness in your posting. Just tell Dennis to go fuck himself. You will fare better. I'm here to help.
    I'm all for being an overly-emotional cunt, but sometimes rationality is underrated 'round these parts.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861

    Swaye said:

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
    Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.

    WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??

    That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???

    Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.

    Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.

    Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.

    God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.

    Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.

    Fuck you you brain dead monkey.


    I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.

    I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.

    Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
    Never show weakness in your posting. Just tell Dennis to go fuck himself. You will fare better. I'm here to help.
    I'm all for being an overly-emotional cunt, but sometimes rationality is underrated 'round these parts.


  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,598 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited April 2019

    Swaye said:

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
    Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.

    WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??

    That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???

    Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.

    Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.

    Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.

    God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.

    Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.

    Fuck you you brain dead monkey.


    I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.

    I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.

    Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
    Never show weakness in your posting. Just tell Dennis to go fuck himself. You will fare better. I'm here to help.
    I'm all for being an overly-emotional cunt, but sometimes rationality is underrated 'round these parts.


    Whatever, Fort Collins. Which hall of famer am I? You wouldn't have fared as well against that mountain lion as that jogger.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,949
    Dammit fudgepackie
  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,598 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited April 2019

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
    Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.

    WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??

    That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???

    Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.

    Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.

    Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.

    God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.

    Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.

    Fuck you you brain dead monkey.


    I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.

    I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.

    Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
    I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
    Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,598 Swaye's Wigwam

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
    Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.

    WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??

    That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???

    Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.

    Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.

    Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.

    God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.

    Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.

    Fuck you you brain dead monkey.


    I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.

    I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.

    Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
    I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
    Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
    The backup needs to shoulder some of the responsibility of being ready to come in and rise to the occasion. I'm not going to put all the blame on the coaches for this.

    Haener is not the answer. I'm sure he works hard and is a good guy, etc.

    Sirmon should absolutely get more reps now and should also get a chance to see the field during the season.
    Valid, but I need a bigger dataset before judging him too harshly. It was one series in a nightmare game against a damn good defense. Like I said, I also hope Sirmon passes him up, but I don't think Haener deserves the criticism he's getting. Not yet.

  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    Who's the MORON? Dennis, you dont know what you're talking about. Maybe you should fucking lurk, understand a little about the sport you pretend to know something about.. whatshouldicareabout actually does know what he's talking about.

    Simply put, Haener is better than the freshmen, by a mile at this point. Remove thee head from thy cunt
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,914 Founders Club

    For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...

    Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??

    BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!

    The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??

    He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.

    This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.

    What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.

    Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?

    But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.

    The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.

    Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
    THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.

    Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.

    The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
    Who's the MORON? Dennis, you dont know what you're talking about. Maybe you should fucking lurk, understand a little about the sport you pretend to know something about.. whatshouldicareabout actually does know what he's talking about.

    Simply put, Haener is better than the freshmen, by a mile at this point. Remove thee head from thy cunt

  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,598 Swaye's Wigwam

    Didnt DDY say his "guys" at practice were hearing Haener was going to start and Eason was going to transfer, 2 weeks ago or so?

    Huh?

    Are DDY's guys actually junior-high gossip girls? Just curious.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Didnt DDY say his "guys" at practice were hearing Haener was going to start and Eason was going to transfer, 2 weeks ago or so?

    Huh?

    Are DDY's guys actually junior-high gossip girls? Just curious.
    Be a better poster
    That a babe cuntslice. Be careful, a dissenting opinion will get you downvoted lol
Sign In or Register to comment.