For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Those dogshit for brains certainty didn’t shit their pants against Cal, now, did they?
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
If Sirmon has a big gun and can't fucking run the offense, why the fuck would he be the backup? So he can throw it harder to the other team? I agree that we should hope for him to take the backup job, but if he ain't ready, he ain't ready. He has to prove he can run the offense and not just be a physical specimen with a two-cent brain. Let's all take a 4-month long bong toke and see where we're at in Fall. Jesus Fucking Christopher.
Fuck man, Em is soaring up the charts. Sirmon was Lindquist last
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Two guys that were first round picks are your examples?? Wouldn't it be nice if Skinny had a college career like Jeff George? Hmmm...
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Two guys that were first round picks are your examples?? Wouldn't it be nice if Skinny had a college career like Jeff George? Hmmm...
The basic point (which I think you get) is that physical ability is not the total package, which your comment earlier seemed to suggest.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Two guys that were first round picks are your examples?? Wouldn't it be nice if Skinny had a college career like Jeff George? Hmmm...
The basic point (which I think you get) is that physical ability is not the total package, which your comment earlier seemed to suggest.
Still, Eason is the guy. No question.
I get your point. What I'm saying is that Skinny's physical ability is likely good enough to make him a great college QB even if he's a fucking idiot. Jamarcus Russell was a great college QB. In the NFL, it's all PhD level football, so the physical/mental ratio needed tilts more to the mental side.
If you think of this in its context, this is basically why Pete likes the mental shit... because with Boise, he didn't have his pick of physically gifted players, so he made the game slant more toward mental stuff, because his ability to be physically better than everyone was not there.
In some ways, it was a more similar situation to the NFL... and Kellen Moore was the Drew Brees of college football. He just couldn't be the Drew Brees of pro football because he doesn't have the physical ability required.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Two guys that were first round picks are your examples?? Wouldn't it be nice if Skinny had a college career like Jeff George? Hmmm...
The basic point (which I think you get) is that physical ability is not the total package, which your comment earlier seemed to suggest.
Still, Eason is the guy. No question.
I get your point. What I'm saying is that Skinny's physical ability is likely good enough to make him a great college QB even if he's a fucking idiot. Jamarcus Russell was a great college QB. In the NFL, it's all PhD level football, so the physical/mental ratio needed tilts more to the mental side.
If you think of this in its context, this is basically why Pete likes the mental shit... because with Boise, he didn't have his pick of physically gifted players, so he made the game slant more toward mental stuff, because his ability to be physically better than everyone was not there.
In some ways, it was a more similar situation to the NFL... and Kellen Moore was the Drew Brees of college football. He just couldn't be the Drew Brees of pro football because he doesn't have the physical ability required.
Now I think we are in the same place. One of my frustrations with Pedersen’s offense is that occasionally it gets too complex, like under babushka. It ends up favoring the smart film rat over the obvious physical specimen who could flourish in a slightly simpler system.
We still cannot have a complete moron that throws the ball a mile. But Eason does not fit that category. Haener should transfer
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Two guys that were first round picks are your examples?? Wouldn't it be nice if Skinny had a college career like Jeff George? Hmmm...
The basic point (which I think you get) is that physical ability is not the total package, which your comment earlier seemed to suggest.
Still, Eason is the guy. No question.
I get your point. What I'm saying is that Skinny's physical ability is likely good enough to make him a great college QB even if he's a fucking idiot. Jamarcus Russell was a great college QB. In the NFL, it's all PhD level football, so the physical/mental ratio needed tilts more to the mental side.
If you think of this in its context, this is basically why Pete likes the mental shit... because with Boise, he didn't have his pick of physically gifted players, so he made the game slant more toward mental stuff, because his ability to be physically better than everyone was not there.
In some ways, it was a more similar situation to the NFL... and Kellen Moore was the Drew Brees of college football. He just couldn't be the Drew Brees of pro football because he doesn't have the physical ability required.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out, other than seniority - why Haener is getting reps with the first team...
Haener has only been here a year longer than Sirmon and had the good fortune for the shitty QB we recruited in front of him transfer out, so he was the only fucking option after we had 2 QB transfers. He goes in and tears it the fuck up vs. North Dakota, then shits himself publicly vs. Cal and all of a sudden he's the front runner to pilot a top-10 program??
BASED ON WHAT? Serial position?!?!
The fact that he's good during practice and beat Brownshits out for the job last year, but because we are weird and don't actually have open competitions for QB we didn't let him play vs. Auburn??
He's only been here a year longer than Sirm and Yank (who is struggling). Sirm isn't struggling and has a WAY higher upside than fucking Haener. Get Haener the F out of there.
This is why every fucking shitty player we get on our roster is a threat. We exacerbate our fucking recruiting mistakes by a stubborn inability to admit to ourselves they don't deserve the same reps as talented players do.
What a fucking beta, participation trophy, seniority-based bullshit policy.
Shitty players should not get reps when we have tons of young talent (COUGH::KYLERMANU::COUGH). How many of you guys here think Kyler Manu is actually going to be better than Danny Hammer?
But let's live in fantasy land and pretend that we are making Danny EARN reps and give him, Calvert, JackSirm, Tafisi, etc. all LESS reps so that the fucking weed dealer on our team can enjoy his place with the ones because of seniority.
The only player I can remember being pushed to the head of the line when he wasn't ready is Jake. Ugh.
Probably because it's a good idea to use the spring ball to build depth in case there are injuries (like what happened to Eason in both years at Georgia).
THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Give the reps to someone who might come in a game and not throw the winning TD to the other team: Sirmon.
The idea that Haener is somehow seriously ahead of Sirmon is fucking farcical and you morons are all clowns for buying into it.
You're basing this on what? That Haener is 6' tall and Sirmon is 6'5?
Jesus Christ you fuckheads are fucking stupid. How fucking retarded can anyone be? This guy is a regular dawgman poster so that says a lot, but this post really says it all anyway.
WHAT ARE YOU BASING THE FACT THAT HANER IS BETTER ON??
That he's been in the system a year longer and shit the bed in his moment of glory???
Holy fucking Christ. HAENER PLAYED LAST YEAR BECAUSE WE HAD NO ONE ELSE.
Sirmon was a fucking true freshman and Eason wasn't eligible.
Also - my dudes at Practice say it's not close between Sirmon and Haener. So fuck you. And my dudes are guaranteed better than yours you fucking fuckwit.
God - everyone here who doesn't inherently understand why Sirmon should be getting more reps than Haener should not be allowed to root for anyone but PLU.
Yeah, sure Haener is fucking great. Big time player. Huge time.
Fuck you you brain dead monkey.
I'm not saying Haener is better. If your dudes at practice say it's not close between Haener and Sirmon, then by all means, I agree with you. I was trying to understand where you were coming from. I tend to lean towards trusting the coaches since they know a lot more than us idiots. Sirmon clearly has more physical talent, but that's only half the battle.
I'm not going to fault Haener for the Cal pick. I was there and it was a shitty situation all around. There's no saying that Sirmon, Browning, or anyone else wouldn't have done the same thing. QBs throw picks. Sometimes them's the breaks. That was one play. Using that as justification for him sucking is beyond dramatic.
Also, it's Spring and they're giving reps to the guy with experience. I also hope as time goes along that Sirmon wins the backup job.
I'm faulting him for the pick and for the throw that bounced off the fucking turf. The moment was too big for him. Sirmon is most likely the more capable QB and should be getting the reps over Haener.
Fuck, he came in cold and unready in a fucked up situation. That was on the coaches and Browning, imo. Haener should never have been thrown into that game on a whim. One series does not a player make. Although he might be, I'm not going to anoint Sirmon as any better than Haener until he plays a down. The guy who has never played is always everybody's favorite quarterback. Prove it, I say.
Tua came in cold down 13 in the national championship against a steamroller.
Haener came in cold up 1 against fucking Cal.
You can find examples to the contrary in any situation. Fuck no is he Tua. I'm not a Haener-backer by any means, and I hope Sirmon plays to his potential and seals the backup job. I'm just not ready to throw Haener under the bus yet because he's 6'0 tall and had a poor series against Cal. If he's better than Sirmon, then he should be the backup. I don't care if Sirmon is taller and has a better sling.
Haener shit the bed. He's not Tua, nor is he Troy Aikman or Peyton Manning.
With some players you are like 'yeah, just let them get the hang of this and they will dominate.'
Haener is not one of those guys.
Jake was the same vs. Boise as he was vs. Ohio State and it's because he physically sucked. Those guys have a hard time getting better because... ...wait for it... ...it's a game that requires tremendous physical ability.
The whole idea that physical ability is discounted in a game whose PRIMARY requirement is exquisite physical ability is fucking bizarre. But that's how dumb white people are.
By the way, Hurts came in after being benched all year and tore it up vs. Georgia, by the way.
Suck a thick cock.
Supreme physical ability like Jeff George or Kelly Stouffer?
Eason should be getting the first team reps. That’s obvious. But plenty of guys with great physical ability had dogsshit for brains. Ask Jay Cutler.
Two guys that were first round picks are your examples?? Wouldn't it be nice if Skinny had a college career like Jeff George? Hmmm...
The basic point (which I think you get) is that physical ability is not the total package, which your comment earlier seemed to suggest.
Still, Eason is the guy. No question.
I get your point. What I'm saying is that Skinny's physical ability is likely good enough to make him a great college QB even if he's a fucking idiot. Jamarcus Russell was a great college QB. In the NFL, it's all PhD level football, so the physical/mental ratio needed tilts more to the mental side.
If you think of this in its context, this is basically why Pete likes the mental shit... because with Boise, he didn't have his pick of physically gifted players, so he made the game slant more toward mental stuff, because his ability to be physically better than everyone was not there.
In some ways, it was a more similar situation to the NFL... and Kellen Moore was the Drew Brees of college football. He just couldn't be the Drew Brees of pro football because he doesn't have the physical ability required.
Comments
Boom.
Still, Eason is the guy. No question.
If you think of this in its context, this is basically why Pete likes the mental shit... because with Boise, he didn't have his pick of physically gifted players, so he made the game slant more toward mental stuff, because his ability to be physically better than everyone was not there.
In some ways, it was a more similar situation to the NFL... and Kellen Moore was the Drew Brees of college football. He just couldn't be the Drew Brees of pro football because he doesn't have the physical ability required.
We still cannot have a complete moron that throws the ball a mile. But Eason does not fit that category. Haener should transfer