Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tad Michael Norman
Comments
-
A car is a fearsome weapon.HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling. -
FifySledog said:
A dawg is a vicious animal.HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling. -
Why do you hate that the logic you employ dictates banning cars?HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling. -
I’m told bullets penetrate car windows.Sledog said:
A car is a fearsome weapon.HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling. -
And?HHusky said:
I’m told bullets penetrate car windows.Sledog said:
A car is a fearsome weapon.HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling. -
i'm told a car has a lot of momentum and they can kill you. That's why mommy told you to look both ways.HHusky said:
I’m told bullets penetrate car windows.Sledog said:
A car is a fearsome weapon.HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.
Watch how cars work on gunmen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFcEMMZju7U
The windshield of a car does bad things to bullets.
Lordy! You are struggling. -
What I learned in this thread...trying to argue with the HH anti gun brigade is pointless. They do not respect the true meaning of freedom and liberty, except for illegals of course, and have a deep need for personal security and to be protected by the state. Trying to hold any conversation on this topic with them is pointless. Instead of wasting your time and energy with this band of toxic masculinity warriors, go to the gun range instead and torch off a couple hundred rounds. You will accomplish more and feel much better.
-
Good idea and the front yard is close!Swaye said:What I learned in this thread...trying to argue with the HH anti gun brigade is pointless. They do not respect the true meaning of freedom and liberty, except for illegals of course, and have a deep need for personal security and to be protected by the state. Trying to hold any conversation on this topic with them is pointless. Instead of wasting your time and energy with this band of toxic masculinity warriors, go to the gun range instead and torch off a couple hundred rounds. You will accomplish more and feel much better.
HH and the rest are rabbit people. They are unable to take care of themselves. Couldn't hunt for food, compete for mates or defend their family or themselves. Cowardly in the real world they despise anyone that possess these traits. It makes them feeeeel bad. They wish to drag everyone down to their level of hopelessness so they can feeeeeel equal. The term has been around a long time. This is where SJW bullshit comes from.
It comes from fear. They live in fear and need and want to be equal even thought they can never be. They just want to make sure everyone is equally miserable.
If a rabbit person obtains power they become quite ruthless. I'm pretty sure this is where socialism/communism and death squads come from.
"People of good will frequently send one off with the injunction to “Have a safe trip!” There is no such thing as a safe trip. Safety is an illusion. It must always fail in the end. That does not mean that we should not consider safety, but never to cry “Safety first!” Safety, while something we should seek, must always be placed second to getting the job done. One who places safety first is, quite specifically, a coward. We do not go to war to be safe, neither do we climb mountains, or race cars, or hunt buffalo, to be safe. We hear commentators explain that we should not resist violent crime because we may get hurt. This is the advice of the rabbit people who live all their lives in fear and never know the joy of danger. There are people like that, and while we may feel sorry for them, we must never take their advice seriously." - Jeff Cooper -
The most salient point is that this tool has a hyphenated first name, Tad-Michael Norman.HHusky said:A more salient observation would be that he owned a gun.
Tad-Michael's parents should be held partially liable for the rampage. Subjecting your kid to that moniker set him to be a failure; likely bullied as kid which drove him to alcoholism.
Or maybe it was the Gilby/Willingham era? -
pawz said:
Why do you hate that the logic you employ dictates banning cars?HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.
I'd simply like owning a gun not to be treated as an absolute right you can only lose after you've killed a couple of your neighbors. I don't feel freer because the deranged can own a gun.Swaye said:What I learned in this thread...trying to argue with the HH anti gun brigade is pointless. They do not respect the true meaning of freedom and liberty, except for illegals of course, and have a deep need for personal security and to be protected by the state. Trying to hold any conversation on this topic with them is pointless. Instead of wasting your time and energy with this band of toxic masculinity warriors, go to the gun range instead and torch off a couple hundred rounds. You will accomplish more and feel much better.
-
Pardon our corpses. That's the smell of freedom.Sledog said:
Good idea and the front yard is close!Swaye said:What I learned in this thread...trying to argue with the HH anti gun brigade is pointless. They do not respect the true meaning of freedom and liberty, except for illegals of course, and have a deep need for personal security and to be protected by the state. Trying to hold any conversation on this topic with them is pointless. Instead of wasting your time and energy with this band of toxic masculinity warriors, go to the gun range instead and torch off a couple hundred rounds. You will accomplish more and feel much better.
HH and the rest are rabbit people. They are unable to take care of themselves. Couldn't hunt for food, compete for mates or defend their family or themselves. Cowardly in the real world they despise anyone that possess these traits. It makes them feeeeel bad. They wish to drag everyone down to their level of hopelessness so they can feeeeeel equal. The term has been around a long time. This is where SJW bullshit comes from.
It comes from fear. They live in fear and need and want to be equal even thought they can never be. They just want to make sure everyone is equally miserable.
If a rabbit person obtains power they become quite ruthless. I'm pretty sure this is where socialism/communism and death squads come from.
"People of good will frequently send one off with the injunction to “Have a safe trip!” There is no such thing as a safe trip. Safety is an illusion. It must always fail in the end. That does not mean that we should not consider safety, but never to cry “Safety first!” Safety, while something we should seek, must always be placed second to getting the job done. One who places safety first is, quite specifically, a coward. We do not go to war to be safe, neither do we climb mountains, or race cars, or hunt buffalo, to be safe. We hear commentators explain that we should not resist violent crime because we may get hurt. This is the advice of the rabbit people who live all their lives in fear and never know the joy of danger. There are people like that, and while we may feel sorry for them, we must never take their advice seriously." - Jeff Cooper
-
But it is an inalienable right that although enshrined in the constitution was considered to be preexisting. How you gonna fix that? Stalin? We know how that works out.HHusky said:pawz said:
Why do you hate that the logic you employ dictates banning cars?HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.
I'd simply like owning a gun not to be treated as an absolute right you can only lose after you've killed a couple of your neighbors. I don't feel freer because the deranged can own a gun.Swaye said:What I learned in this thread...trying to argue with the HH anti gun brigade is pointless. They do not respect the true meaning of freedom and liberty, except for illegals of course, and have a deep need for personal security and to be protected by the state. Trying to hold any conversation on this topic with them is pointless. Instead of wasting your time and energy with this band of toxic masculinity warriors, go to the gun range instead and torch off a couple hundred rounds. You will accomplish more and feel much better.
Freedom isn't free. That's just how it works out. Lax laws and crazy people containment don't help.
-
BUT WE MUST DO SOMETHING!Sledog said:
But it is an inalienable right that although enshrined in the constitution was considered to be preexisting. How you gonna fix that? Stalin? We know how that works out.HHusky said:pawz said:
Why do you hate that the logic you employ dictates banning cars?HHusky said:
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.
I'd simply like owning a gun not to be treated as an absolute right you can only lose after you've killed a couple of your neighbors. I don't feel freer because the deranged can own a gun.Swaye said:What I learned in this thread...trying to argue with the HH anti gun brigade is pointless. They do not respect the true meaning of freedom and liberty, except for illegals of course, and have a deep need for personal security and to be protected by the state. Trying to hold any conversation on this topic with them is pointless. Instead of wasting your time and energy with this band of toxic masculinity warriors, go to the gun range instead and torch off a couple hundred rounds. You will accomplish more and feel much better.
Freedom isn't free. That's just how it works out. Lax laws and crazy people containment don't help.
-
Damn you can't even be in the school play! Life isn't safe. HTH
https://www.foxnews.com/us/drama-student-at-connecticut-college-stabs-2-acting-out-the-butterfly-effect-police -
I hated that movie.
-
If tad we're a black man he would have been littered with at least 50 bullets.
-
truffjecornel said:
If tad we're a black man he would have been littered with at least 50 bullets. -
Yeah, it's pretty amazing they didn't light him up.jecornel said:
If tad we're a black man he would have been littered with at least 50 bullets.
