Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.
I'm hearing cars don't have regulations that save lives and you can drive a gun to work.
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.
Liberal/communist problem too.
Shooter was a communist?
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.
Liberal/communist problem too.
Shooter was a communist?
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?
I’d heard it was you gals who are armed to the teeth. Isn’t that why you’re supposed to win Civil War II?
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.
Liberal/communist problem too.
Shooter was a communist?
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?
I’d heard it was you gals who are armed to the teeth. Isn’t that why you’re supposed to win Civil War II?
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.
Then why did you? Was it an accident? Did your dick fall out and start typing on your keyboard?
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.
This endeth the gun control discussion.
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.
Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.
Fuck off.
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.
Then why did you? Was it an accident? Did your dick fall out and start typing on your keyboard?
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.
This endeth the gun control discussion.
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.
This endeth the gun control discussion.
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.
This endeth the gun control discussion.
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.
This endeth the gun control discussion.
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?
Who needs a gun if you have a car?
You're really struggling.
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?
Comments
How much harm could this guy have done without a gun?
Fuck off.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.