Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tad Michael Norman
Comments
-
He stole the car, shooting its driver with a gun. Hope this helps.
-
He crashed that car into another car. That car's driver is dead.HHusky said:He stole the car, shooting its driver with a gun. Hope this helps.
Hope this helps. -
Yet the fact he himself may have been a car owner is irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
-
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron. -
How does that make it relevant that he may own a car? Nobody died because he owns a car, assuming he does own a car.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron. -
He would not have been able to do all of this without the mobility of a car. Therefore all vehicles should be immediately banned.
-
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
Not really a strong defense of blob’s original and incorrect statement. He’s had the good sense to hide.Sledog said:He would not have been able to do all of this without the mobility of a car. Therefore all vehicles should be immediately banned.
-
Please enlighten us on this making guns safer thing. I'm guessing your experience is in the Nerf field.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
If he’d used his car to steal a gun, you girls would really have a helluvan argument.
