Tad Michael Norman

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

If he’d used his car to steal a gun, you girls would really have a helluvan argument.

So those terrorist attacks with trucks are OK. Shouldn't the trucks be safer?

The solution is a good guy with a truck.

Just don't let terrorists into the country. See simple.

What kinda Muslim name is Tad Michael Norman?

Racist much?

What race is Muslim?

Other

Like your sexual identity.

2001400ex

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Sledog

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

The discussion was increased firearms safety. But just liberal Bullshit tossed out with zero knowledge. As usual.

pawz

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.

Fuck off.

2001400ex

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.

Fuck off.

That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.

BennyBeaver

New? Tug Tavern Board Tagline: "Come watch Sledoog Struggle in Every Thread"

Sledog

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.

Fuck off.

That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.

Discussion want gun control. I was simply poonting out the stupidity of the argument.

HHusky

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.

Fuck off.

That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.

It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.

Sledog

HHusky said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.

Fuck off.

That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.

It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.

Liberal/communist problem too.

2001400ex

HHusky said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.

No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.

You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.

You're really a fucking moron.

Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.

That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.

You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.

So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.

Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.

Fuck off.

That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.

It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.

I'm hearing cars don't have regulations that save lives and you can drive a gun to work.