Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tad Michael Norman
Comments
-
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
I'm hearing you're a liar.2001400ex said:
I'm hearing cars don't have regulations that save lives and you can drive a gun to work.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?HHusky said:
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
I’d heard it was you gals who are armed to the teeth. Isn’t that why you’re supposed to win Civil War II?Sledog said:
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?HHusky said:
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
How with those "safer" guns?HHusky said:
I’d heard it was you gals who are armed to the teeth. Isn’t that why you’re supposed to win Civil War II?Sledog said:
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?HHusky said:
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off.
-
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
Then why did you? Was it an accident? Did your dick fall out and start typing on your keyboard?pawz said:
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
