Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tad Michael Norman
Comments
-
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
The discussion was increased firearms safety. But just liberal Bullshit tossed out with zero knowledge. As usual.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off.
-
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
New? Tug Tavern Board Tagline: "Come watch Sledoog Struggle in Every Thread"
-
Discussion want gun control. I was simply poonting out the stupidity of the argument.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
I'm hearing cars don't have regulations that save lives and you can drive a gun to work.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
I'm hearing you're a liar.2001400ex said:
I'm hearing cars don't have regulations that save lives and you can drive a gun to work.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?HHusky said:
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
I’d heard it was you gals who are armed to the teeth. Isn’t that why you’re supposed to win Civil War II?Sledog said:
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?HHusky said:
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
How with those "safer" guns?HHusky said:
I’d heard it was you gals who are armed to the teeth. Isn’t that why you’re supposed to win Civil War II?Sledog said:
No idea. But we do have a liberal/commie problem. You have ideas how to make them safer too?HHusky said:
Shooter was a communist?Sledog said:
Liberal/communist problem too.HHusky said:
It’s beyond them to concede that we’ve got a gun problem in this country.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off.
-
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
Then why did you? Was it an accident? Did your dick fall out and start typing on your keyboard?pawz said:
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off. -
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
How much harm could this guy have done without a gun? -
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
-
I didn't you incompetent invalid retard.2001400ex said:
Then why did you? Was it an accident? Did your dick fall out and start typing on your keyboard?pawz said:
Reading for comprehension. It wasn't meant to be.2001400ex said:
That's a convincing argument on why cars should be discussed with gun control.pawz said:
Don't pretend like you have any interest in discussion. You don't.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to engage in the discussion. Just throw out that cars kill more people than guns. That's a real sign of intelligence right there.pawz said:
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it.
Fuck off.
Fuck off. -
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
-
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
-
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.
-
Can’t one of the smarter gun nuts tell you what went down?pawz said:
Who needs a gun if you have a car?HHusky said:
Yes. What were those drivers even thinking being out on the road without a loaded gun on the passenger seat of their cars?Sledog said:
That's every country. Not just this country. That's why I carry a gun and know how to use it. There is no other way. There is no paradise that's violence free. Take responsibility for your own safety and that of your family.HHusky said:
No argument that it’s there, whatever it means. And aren’t we all grateful to live in a country where every sociopath can take us or our kids out without warning? I live not more than a quarter mile from the scene; my daughter was driving home and missed it by no more than 5 minutes. Yet this kind of event is almost unremarkable in the US, so it isn’t really like one should think it can’t happen to you.Sledog said:
An item so important it made the bill of rights. Came in at #2.HHusky said:
Mall cop needs someone to explain that gun rights don’t refer to rights possessed by guns.Sledog said:
This endeth the gun control discussion.HHusky said:
I’ll be happy to hold the gun blameless.Sledog said:
I don't you do. It's somehow the guns fault!HHusky said:
Those poor, innocent guns should be protected from people. I really don’t care if you want to frame the problem that way.Sledog said:Weird how one can blame one inanimate objects, a gun, but not another, a car. The asshole murderer was the problem.
As far as the 2nd we know what it means. A lot of the signers were most likely armed when they signed it.
You're really struggling.
