Tad Michael Norman
Comments
-
A more salient observation would be that he owned a gun.
-
No more relevant than he was a car ownerHHusky said:A more salient observation would be that he owned a gun.
-
Most likely a democrat by statistic. We should outlaw that.HHusky said:A more salient observation would be that he owned a gun.
-
A sociology major at UW can get a job at Microsoft while a CES major from Oregon can't even get an engineering job in Portland.
Another example in my case against these shit schools. -
Oregon isn't that shitty. They turn out thousands of excellent gas pumpers! And it only takes 4 years. 5 if you play for Uncle Sugars team.haie said:A sociology major at UW can get a job at Microsoft while a CES major from Oregon can't even get an engineering job in Portland.
Another example in my case against these shit schools. -
-
Nope. You didn’t follow the story.pawz said: -
-
He stole the car, shooting its driver with a gun. Hope this helps.
-
He crashed that car into another car. That car's driver is dead.HHusky said:He stole the car, shooting its driver with a gun. Hope this helps.
Hope this helps. -
Yet the fact he himself may have been a car owner is irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
-
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron. -
How does that make it relevant that he may own a car? Nobody died because he owns a car, assuming he does own a car.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron. -
He would not have been able to do all of this without the mobility of a car. Therefore all vehicles should be immediately banned.
-
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
Not really a strong defense of blob’s original and incorrect statement. He’s had the good sense to hide.Sledog said:He would not have been able to do all of this without the mobility of a car. Therefore all vehicles should be immediately banned.
-
Please enlighten us on this making guns safer thing. I'm guessing your experience is in the Nerf field.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
If he’d used his car to steal a gun, you girls would really have a helluvan argument.
-
So those terrorist attacks with trucks are OK. Shouldn't the trucks be safer?HHusky said:If he’d used his car to steal a gun, you girls would really have a helluvan argument.
-
You shouldn't ever talk to anybody about being "smart enough". Ever.2001400ex said:
Serious question. Why do you gun nuts try to equate people dying in cars to people dying with guns? You do realize that there's a shit ton of regulations around cars to make them safer. Yet you freak out whenever someone wants to bring up a regulation to make guns safer.pawz said:
No. He committed homicide (illegal btw) with both a gun and a vehicle.HHusky said:Yet the fact he himself was a car owner was irrelevant. Thanks for the concession.
You don't want to ban cars when they are statistically more likely to be involved in an untimely death.
You're really a fucking moron.
That makes your argument much worse yet you aren't even smart enough to realize it. -
How is that?HHusky said:If he’d used his car to steal a gun, you girls would really have a helluvan argument.
-
Just don't let terrorists into the country. See simple.HHusky said: -
What kinda Muslim name is Tad Michael Norman?Sledog said:
