Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
SPRING FUCKING FOOTBALL
Comments
-
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter at QB other than Jack and Jack? Brock is the only one I can think of who even had a shot to be one and he left after his junior year (and probably wasn't the best QB on the team at that point anyway).Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm nervous about it myself... but I generally have a positive feeling.HillsboroDuck said:
I'm in on Bush, I thought the play calling took real steps forward with the noted exceptions of Auburn and the first half at tOSU. I think he's going to be a good OC.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
The flip side is Browning probably regressed. I can't bring myself to say @Babushka was a better QB coach, but I'd be lying if I didn't say I was a little nervous about Bush at QB coach. That said, chin ability to unfuck Browning is hardly a failure.
If Eason's good this year I'll be full blown Smush For Bush.
I think Browning regressed because his cramps just got a lot worse.
But again, that's not based on hard evidence, just my feeling from watching closely.
Also - I've heard (and it doesn't take a genius to surmise) that there was some trouble in paradise between Jake and Bush. I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter (or even a SR QB) get benched for not doing shit?
I honestly can't recall.
Dude's I can remember:
Browning - 4 years
Cyler - One year of FYFMFE
Keif - 3 years
Lockner - 4 (plus some Rainbow Ronnie!)
Stanback - 2 (half year of Bonnell post chinjury)
@Paws - Uno (Shudder )
Pickett - 3
Tui - 2 (Fuck Lambo for burning his redshirt. 2001 Tui with actual receivers would have been the fucking shit.)
Brock - 3
Damon - 3
Brunell - 1 1/2
Hobert - 1 1/2
Conklin - 2
Chandelier - 2
Millen - 2ish
-
lolDennis_DeYoung said:I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
-
I want to see what Jules can do for certain.Beno4Life said:
THIS.chuck said:
All I want to know is which positions Dr J and Kyler Gordon are playing. Those are the only real questions needing to be asked and answered, aside from several other open positions and players there are questions about. I can't fucking wait to see the DBS this year.
Why the fuck isn’t anyone talking about Julius Fucking Irvin?
Is it just cause his arm was in a sling at the Rose Bowl and he was in sweats at the Husky Underwear Olympics?
Kid had the most insane HS DB film since David “I fucking love climbing trees” Long Jr.
Plus, his dad is hilarious Twitter stalking LA Rams cheerleaders, and his accountant brother was super fucking nice at the bar post-Auburn. “Saban used burner phones, but Pete remembered my name and asked how work was going.”
All I can say is remember when Budda and Sid started for us as freshmen then both left as juniors?
Byron Muprhy’s first game he had two picks.
The last thing I’m worried about is a DBackfield with
KT, Elijah, (MB), Dom Hampton, Kyler, Jules Irvin, etc.
We are going to be super extra fine back there.
McKinney, Spam, KamFab, Alex Cook, Trent McDuffie - someone is going to be good.
Remember Trent was rated higher than BMurph (though I liked BM better tbh). But just saying, when you have tons of talent coming though and one of the best coaches in the country, you can’t count on some shit happening. -
If you’re not still bitter about no Tui in 2001 you’re a fucking Duck fan.HillsboroDuck said:
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter at QB other than Jack and Jack? Brock is the only one I can think of who even had a shot to be one and he left after his junior year (and probably wasn't the best QB on the team at that point anyway).Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm nervous about it myself... but I generally have a positive feeling.HillsboroDuck said:
I'm in on Bush, I thought the play calling took real steps forward with the noted exceptions of Auburn and the first half at tOSU. I think he's going to be a good OC.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
The flip side is Browning probably regressed. I can't bring myself to say @Babushka was a better QB coach, but I'd be lying if I didn't say I was a little nervous about Bush at QB coach. That said, chin ability to unfuck Browning is hardly a failure.
If Eason's good this year I'll be full blown Smush For Bush.
I think Browning regressed because his cramps just got a lot worse.
But again, that's not based on hard evidence, just my feeling from watching closely.
Also - I've heard (and it doesn't take a genius to surmise) that there was some trouble in paradise between Jake and Bush. I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter (or even a SR QB) get benched for not doing shit?
I honestly can't recall.
Dude's I can remember:
Browning - 4 years
Cyler - One year of FYFMFE
Keif - 3 years
Lockner - 4 (plus some Rainbow Ronnie!)
Stanback - 2 (half year of Bonnell post chinjury)
@Paws - Uno (Shudder )
Pickett - 3
Tui - 2 (Fuck Lambo for burning his redshirt. 2001 Tui with actual receivers would have been the fucking shit.)
Brock - 3
Damon - 3
Brunell - 1 1/2
Hobert - 1 1/2
Conklin - 2
Chandelier - 2
Millen - 2ish -
When is that not the password redman?Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
PuppyLove_LamboCock!!!! True???Dennis_DeYoung said:
If you’re not still bitter about no Tui in 2001 you’re a fucking Duck fan.HillsboroDuck said:
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter at QB other than Jack and Jack? Brock is the only one I can think of who even had a shot to be one and he left after his junior year (and probably wasn't the best QB on the team at that point anyway).Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm nervous about it myself... but I generally have a positive feeling.HillsboroDuck said:
I'm in on Bush, I thought the play calling took real steps forward with the noted exceptions of Auburn and the first half at tOSU. I think he's going to be a good OC.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
The flip side is Browning probably regressed. I can't bring myself to say @Babushka was a better QB coach, but I'd be lying if I didn't say I was a little nervous about Bush at QB coach. That said, chin ability to unfuck Browning is hardly a failure.
If Eason's good this year I'll be full blown Smush For Bush.
I think Browning regressed because his cramps just got a lot worse.
But again, that's not based on hard evidence, just my feeling from watching closely.
Also - I've heard (and it doesn't take a genius to surmise) that there was some trouble in paradise between Jake and Bush. I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter (or even a SR QB) get benched for not doing shit?
I honestly can't recall.
Dude's I can remember:
Browning - 4 years
Cyler - One year of FYFMFE
Keif - 3 years
Lockner - 4 (plus some Rainbow Ronnie!)
Stanback - 2 (half year of Bonnell post chinjury)
@Paws - Uno (Shudder )
Pickett - 3
Tui - 2 (Fuck Lambo for burning his redshirt. 2001 Tui with actual receivers would have been the fucking shit.)
Brock - 3
Damon - 3
Brunell - 1 1/2
Hobert - 1 1/2
Conklin - 2
Chandelier - 2
Millen - 2ish -
WeakarmCobra said:
When is that not the password redman?Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith -
Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith -
No one has brought up Easons Lack of mobility? Could be an issue.
-
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in. -
Given our OL we should have no problem with lead footed quarterbacks.Bread said:No one has brought up Easons Lack of mobility? Could be an issue.
-
Is his lack of mobility even a real thing?Bread said:No one has brought up Easons Lack of mobility? Could be an issue.
-
FUCK OFF HAENER
That’s all I need to read -
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3 -
He wouldn’t be top 3 for Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, Bama or Clemson.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3 -
We can never be that good. I just want to win the Pac and maybe win a Rose Bowl someday. As long as the kids graduate and have fun and learn about life I'm good tooDennis_DeYoung said:
He wouldn’t be top 3 for Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, Bama or Clemson.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3 -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
He wouldn’t be top 3 for Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, Bama or Clemson.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3
We don't need him to be if our defense is better than 4 out of 5 of those teams, which IMO it is -
WoodSwaye said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Keep this on the downlow, but the master password is MargMeltdown010119Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
I see us going 0-12 losing by an average of 77-4.
-
Oh fuck not this again.Dennis_DeYoung said:
He wouldn’t be top 3 for Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, Bama or Clemson.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3
Hunter Renfro's been top 3 at Clemson. Fuller sure as fuck could have been. -
Race gets it.RaceBannon said:
We can never be that good. I just want to win the Pac and maybe win a Rose Bowl someday. As long as the kids graduate and have fun and learn about life I'm good tooDennis_DeYoung said:
He wouldn’t be top 3 for Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, Bama or Clemson.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3 -
What’s with the fucking optimism?? We? Suck. We are WORSE this year.whlinder said:I see us going 0-12 losing by an average of 77-4.
-
Look DDY, if you are going to do true Doogman narratives, you have to include ball washing on some walk-ons before you mention/forget the blue chippers. You can't go half Kimmy, has to be full Kimmy. Love it though and thanks for the pre dental entertainment.
-
RaceBannon said:
We can never be that good. I just want to win the Pac and maybe win a Rose Bowl someday. As long as the kids graduate and have fun and Bang Orientals I'm good tooDennis_DeYoung said:
He wouldn’t be top 3 for Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, Bama or Clemson.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Poor Fuller gets shit on because his dipshit position coaches could never recruit anyone better. Dude is maximizing his talent to the full(er)est and is a baller for a guy who wasn't blessed with the body of Ty Jones, the speed of Ross, or the hands of Dante.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
Please Bush, just find someone else who can emerge as a #1 target so we can appreciate Fuller in the role he's supposed to be in.
He aint a #1, but he could be a good #2 or phenomenal 3 -
I have no idea what I'm missing here.Bread said: -
Apple Cup was also another reason for optimism IMO. CP mentioned after that the game plan went out the window and the offense got better as the game went on (coach platitudes aside).Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Apparently only snow simplifys our? offense
-
To clarify, it was an observation, not an opinion or indictment.Neighbor2972 said:
I'm not really worried about OLB numbers going forward. It would be nice to get a prototype SAM & BUCK every year, but when that doesn't happen I'd rather have a talented DT than a JAG OLB. Our coaches have adjusted well to where our talent is, playing 335 in base downs when we don't have great OLBs. Like Benning is basically going to be a OLB still on base downs, hopefully we just take him out on passing downs.tysenallumbaugh said:Ariel to ILB is the move. IIRC, (when) he played last year, it was mostly in-space/from depth. Results were mixed but he is the type of athlete we? need playing in the middle. Also, we're? down to 6 OLB's listed on the roster... 2 haven't even shown up yet.
Last year, after Amadre left, we? only had 5/6 on the roster. To me, it’s indicative of a strategy + roster management change
