Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
SPRING FUCKING FOOTBALL
Comments
-
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter at QB other than Jack and Jack? Brock is the only one I can think of who even had a shot to be one and he left after his junior year (and probably wasn't the best QB on the team at that point anyway).Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm nervous about it myself... but I generally have a positive feeling.HillsboroDuck said:
I'm in on Bush, I thought the play calling took real steps forward with the noted exceptions of Auburn and the first half at tOSU. I think he's going to be a good OC.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
The flip side is Browning probably regressed. I can't bring myself to say @Babushka was a better QB coach, but I'd be lying if I didn't say I was a little nervous about Bush at QB coach. That said, chin ability to unfuck Browning is hardly a failure.
If Eason's good this year I'll be full blown Smush For Bush.
I think Browning regressed because his cramps just got a lot worse.
But again, that's not based on hard evidence, just my feeling from watching closely.
Also - I've heard (and it doesn't take a genius to surmise) that there was some trouble in paradise between Jake and Bush. I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter (or even a SR QB) get benched for not doing shit?
I honestly can't recall.
Dude's I can remember:
Browning - 4 years
Cyler - One year of FYFMFE
Keif - 3 years
Lockner - 4 (plus some Rainbow Ronnie!)
Stanback - 2 (half year of Bonnell post chinjury)
@Paws - Uno (Shudder )
Pickett - 3
Tui - 2 (Fuck Lambo for burning his redshirt. 2001 Tui with actual receivers would have been the fucking shit.)
Brock - 3
Damon - 3
Brunell - 1 1/2
Hobert - 1 1/2
Conklin - 2
Chandelier - 2
Millen - 2ish
-
lolDennis_DeYoung said:I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
-
I want to see what Jules can do for certain.Beno4Life said:
THIS.chuck said:
All I want to know is which positions Dr J and Kyler Gordon are playing. Those are the only real questions needing to be asked and answered, aside from several other open positions and players there are questions about. I can't fucking wait to see the DBS this year.
Why the fuck isn’t anyone talking about Julius Fucking Irvin?
Is it just cause his arm was in a sling at the Rose Bowl and he was in sweats at the Husky Underwear Olympics?
Kid had the most insane HS DB film since David “I fucking love climbing trees” Long Jr.
Plus, his dad is hilarious Twitter stalking LA Rams cheerleaders, and his accountant brother was super fucking nice at the bar post-Auburn. “Saban used burner phones, but Pete remembered my name and asked how work was going.”
All I can say is remember when Budda and Sid started for us as freshmen then both left as juniors?
Byron Muprhy’s first game he had two picks.
The last thing I’m worried about is a DBackfield with
KT, Elijah, (MB), Dom Hampton, Kyler, Jules Irvin, etc.
We are going to be super extra fine back there.
McKinney, Spam, KamFab, Alex Cook, Trent McDuffie - someone is going to be good.
Remember Trent was rated higher than BMurph (though I liked BM better tbh). But just saying, when you have tons of talent coming though and one of the best coaches in the country, you can’t count on some shit happening. -
If you’re not still bitter about no Tui in 2001 you’re a fucking Duck fan.HillsboroDuck said:
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter at QB other than Jack and Jack? Brock is the only one I can think of who even had a shot to be one and he left after his junior year (and probably wasn't the best QB on the team at that point anyway).Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm nervous about it myself... but I generally have a positive feeling.HillsboroDuck said:
I'm in on Bush, I thought the play calling took real steps forward with the noted exceptions of Auburn and the first half at tOSU. I think he's going to be a good OC.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
The flip side is Browning probably regressed. I can't bring myself to say @Babushka was a better QB coach, but I'd be lying if I didn't say I was a little nervous about Bush at QB coach. That said, chin ability to unfuck Browning is hardly a failure.
If Eason's good this year I'll be full blown Smush For Bush.
I think Browning regressed because his cramps just got a lot worse.
But again, that's not based on hard evidence, just my feeling from watching closely.
Also - I've heard (and it doesn't take a genius to surmise) that there was some trouble in paradise between Jake and Bush. I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter (or even a SR QB) get benched for not doing shit?
I honestly can't recall.
Dude's I can remember:
Browning - 4 years
Cyler - One year of FYFMFE
Keif - 3 years
Lockner - 4 (plus some Rainbow Ronnie!)
Stanback - 2 (half year of Bonnell post chinjury)
@Paws - Uno (Shudder )
Pickett - 3
Tui - 2 (Fuck Lambo for burning his redshirt. 2001 Tui with actual receivers would have been the fucking shit.)
Brock - 3
Damon - 3
Brunell - 1 1/2
Hobert - 1 1/2
Conklin - 2
Chandelier - 2
Millen - 2ish -
When is that not the password redman?Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
PuppyLove_LamboCock!!!! True???Dennis_DeYoung said:
If you’re not still bitter about no Tui in 2001 you’re a fucking Duck fan.HillsboroDuck said:
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter at QB other than Jack and Jack? Brock is the only one I can think of who even had a shot to be one and he left after his junior year (and probably wasn't the best QB on the team at that point anyway).Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm nervous about it myself... but I generally have a positive feeling.HillsboroDuck said:
I'm in on Bush, I thought the play calling took real steps forward with the noted exceptions of Auburn and the first half at tOSU. I think he's going to be a good OC.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
The flip side is Browning probably regressed. I can't bring myself to say @Babushka was a better QB coach, but I'd be lying if I didn't say I was a little nervous about Bush at QB coach. That said, chin ability to unfuck Browning is hardly a failure.
If Eason's good this year I'll be full blown Smush For Bush.
I think Browning regressed because his cramps just got a lot worse.
But again, that's not based on hard evidence, just my feeling from watching closely.
Also - I've heard (and it doesn't take a genius to surmise) that there was some trouble in paradise between Jake and Bush. I think Bush prefers QBs that play well and Jake was not amenable to that.
When's the last time UW had a 4 year starter (or even a SR QB) get benched for not doing shit?
I honestly can't recall.
Dude's I can remember:
Browning - 4 years
Cyler - One year of FYFMFE
Keif - 3 years
Lockner - 4 (plus some Rainbow Ronnie!)
Stanback - 2 (half year of Bonnell post chinjury)
@Paws - Uno (Shudder )
Pickett - 3
Tui - 2 (Fuck Lambo for burning his redshirt. 2001 Tui with actual receivers would have been the fucking shit.)
Brock - 3
Damon - 3
Brunell - 1 1/2
Hobert - 1 1/2
Conklin - 2
Chandelier - 2
Millen - 2ish -
WeakarmCobra said:
When is that not the password redman?Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith -
Swaye said:
Um, why did I get a picture of three geriatric men fucking? Is that the password?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yes. bowdowntowashington.com - it's really good. PM me for a password.RaceBannon said:Can't chin enough for the Dawgman narratives alone
But the rest is good too
Is there a website where we can read more of your stuff?
-
Ty CAN be great. Fuller isn’t likely to. That’s the difference.RoadDawg55 said:
Fuller made some nice, contested catches last year. He did fall off late. I still can’t get behind that he sucks. Ty Jones has never broken a tackle. He’s big and a 4 star so he gets sucked off.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuller did not break a tackle last year. Which position do you want a guy who didn't break a tackle?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Disagree with Bush doing a good job last year. Where is this narrative coming from? C at best
Disagree with Fuller sucking. He is pretty good but not a WR #1.
AGREE on rest
Bush looked good to me and we had tons of people open, but Jake had a hard time doing anything. He wasn't perfect (Bush), but I thought he really improved as the season went on. Hard to do much when you can't throw more than 15 yards and everyone stacks the box and your QB shits himself.
2nd half Rose Bowl Jake was as good as he's ever played because he stopped playing like a scared bitch and let it fly. And our dudes (even your boy Fuller) made plays on the ball (though Fuller still didn't break a tackle).
I feel good about Bush... cautiously optimistic. But I can see how reasonable people would think otherwise. That's just my read of it.
Fuller should be a slot except he can't break tackles or make moves after the catch.
Fuller doesn't break tackles, but he does get open, runs good routes, and makes some good catches. He doesn't suck. Needs to be more physical.
Bush is TBD due to Browning, but even still I saw nothing from him that looked better than Smith
