This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
What? More catches and more yards isn't cherry picking.
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
What? More catches and more yards isn't cherry picking.
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
If Pettis was only returning punts he would probably be a bigger help to the team last year then fuller was in totallity. I guess the pure recieving numbers make sense for what your saying though
This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
What? More catches and more yards isn't cherry picking.
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
Fuller fell off late in the season. That said, he was very good for most of the season. He’s pretty good. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays in the NFL.
This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
What? More catches and more yards isn't cherry picking.
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
Fuller fell off late in the season. That said, he was very good for most of the season. He’s pretty good. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays in the NFL.
He’s a really interesting case in that I feel like his 2019 has a million possible outcomes. Does he take another step forward and become 1000 yard receiver and draft pick playing with a real QB? Does he truly get passed by Baccelia and buried in the depth as young receivers step forward? Does he stay in the lineup but perform like the second half of last year?
I could see him having 200 yards or 1000 yards next year. WR in general is extremely unpredictable next season. Spring ball and fall camp will be huge.
This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
What? More catches and more yards isn't cherry picking.
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
Fuller fell off late in the season. That said, he was very good for most of the season. He’s pretty good. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays in the NFL.
He’s a really interesting case in that I feel like his 2019 has a million possible outcomes. Does he take another step forward and become 1000 yard receiver and draft pick playing with a real QB? Does he truly get passed by Baccelia and buried in the depth as young receivers step forward? Does he stay in the lineup but perform like the second half of last year?
I could see him having 200 yards or 1000 yards next year. WR in general is extremely unpredictable next season. Spring ball and fall camp will be huge.
K1000 yards....if it dosent happen I will donate $129 to have fudgepack banned for 4 weeks for being a dumb ass for twatting at parents of croots
This gets back to my point of slotting guys properly ...
If Aaron Fuller is your top WR then you are probably mediocre as a position group ...
If Aaron Fuller is your 3rd best WR ... then you might have a pretty good receiving group ...
This isn’t hard
This is well put. Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible. I think he will be pretty good this year as a secondary option but he obviously isnt a number one wr to depend on every game. I think the same of Opera.
Who gets most receptions next year? Ty step up?
There's a pretty decent argument that Fuller had a better junior year than Pettis did as a senior.
Which brings back to the same point I made when Pettis was headed into the draft - he's a lot better than people realized he just had an absolute train wreck for a QB. The 49ers, to their credit, realized this and still took Dante in the second round.
I don't think Fuller's a second rounder but I don't think he's a JAG either. Dude's two best games were at Auburn and at Utah, so fuck off with the "he only produced against shit opponents" nonsense.
Explain
More catches and more yards.
Pettis' top four games of 2017: @ Oregon State, Fresno State (six of his 7 td's in these 2 games), Oregon, Utah.
Fuller's top four games of 2018: Auburn (road neutral), at Utah, at UCLA, BYU.
Fuller's best games came against better aggregate opponents than Pettis' did.
I'm not bashing Pettis here. Dante was the fucking man. His senior year numbers were only bad because Browning.
But I think the same mostly applies to Fuller's junior year.
Saying that there is an argument for having a better season than Pettis then proceding to cherry pick and omit the best parts of his games that were good is... bizzare
What? More catches and more yards isn't cherry picking.
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
Fuller fell off late in the season. That said, he was very good for most of the season. He’s pretty good. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays in the NFL.
He’s a really interesting case in that I feel like his 2019 has a million possible outcomes. Does he take another step forward and become 1000 yard receiver and draft pick playing with a real QB? Does he truly get passed by Baccelia and buried in the depth as young receivers step forward? Does he stay in the lineup but perform like the second half of last year?
I could see him having 200 yards or 1000 yards next year. WR in general is extremely unpredictable next season. Spring ball and fall camp will be huge.
K1000 yards....if it dosent happen I will donate $129 to have fudgepack banned for 4 weeks for being a dumb ass for twatting at parents of croots
Comments
Should we have guys that are better than him right now? Hell yes, but we don't.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/ClarGa00.htm
Gary Zimmerman made 7 Pro Bowls and is also in the Hall of Fame
Gary Johnson had 4 Pro Bowls and 2 1st-Team All Pros.
Gary glitter?
This is a conversation about wr's. Obviously Pettis was an insane PR. I'm not arguing that Fuller's a better player than Pettis in any sense. I'm just saying for the "Just because he was unfairly asked to be the next Dante doesn't mean hes terrible" line that he was a pretty damn reasonable facsimile of Dante production wise as a receiver.
The only reason I posted anything about top 4 games was because people have already tried to make the argument that Fuller only got his yards against shit competition, which isn't true.
but hh appropriate lol
Stats are for losers!
I could see him having 200 yards or 1000 yards next year. WR in general is extremely unpredictable next season. Spring ball and fall camp will be huge.
Wait, what are we talking about?