The Dems FS
Comments
-
Link?sarktastic said:Why don’t you just go to her website and read it?
-
Reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Read it, I have.RaceBannon said:
What is?2001400ex said:
What you typed is absurd. Good thing that's not the green new deal.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
-
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs. -
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs. -
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs. -
So the lefties used to run the moral equivalence play to no end.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
Now it’s the space time continuum equivalence angle. Because 8 years of deficits = 800 years of climate change.
Brilliant. -
No the climate change deal won't happen overnight. And honestly we need to be tougher on China and India and shit or what we do won't matter.PurpleThrobber said:
So the lefties used to run the moral equivalence play to no end.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
Now it’s the space time continuum equivalence angle. Because 8 years of deficits = 800 years of climate change.
Brilliant.
But if we don't start doing something now, we might get left behind. I'd rather be in the forefront of renewable energy. And you are fucktarded if you don't think it's a good idea to invest in it.
It's too bad the GOP is bought off by big oil so they are scared about the green new deal and peddle lies and bullshit about it. And you eat it up. -
Getting rid of air travel? Isn’t it about alternatives that create competition and ultimately lower the cost of the services for the American user?Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
-
It's about cow farts and trains. Keep up.DawgFader said:
Getting rid of air travel? Isn’t it about alternatives that create competition and ultimately lower the cost of the services for the American user?Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
-
Why is it the dumbest, loudest people are always the ones claiming to understand human nature and economics? It's almost like a mating callSFGbob said:
Anyone with even understanding of economics, human nature, and an ounce of integrity. So pretty much everyone that isn't a committed leftist. They are cultists. This is their religion. And like most religious people their beliefs are based upon faith, not on a tangible reality or facts.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
"Guys, over here! I read part of Atlas Shrugged and skimmed Milton Friedman's wikipedia entry too!" -
Its about stopping pollution guys
-
You act like you haven't been there begging to help her campaign for president.2001400ex said:
Link?sarktastic said:Why don’t you just go to her website and read it?
-
It won't happen. It will never happen. But then the plan is to get rid of the constitution. How you gonna do that since the constitution won't allow the moves that would have to be made to deprive millions of their property, rights, freedom, pursuit of happiness etc. etc. etc.2001400ex said:
No the climate change deal won't happen overnight. And honestly we need to be tougher on China and India and shit or what we do won't matter.PurpleThrobber said:
So the lefties used to run the moral equivalence play to no end.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
Now it’s the space time continuum equivalence angle. Because 8 years of deficits = 800 years of climate change.
Brilliant.
But if we don't start doing something now, we might get left behind. I'd rather be in the forefront of renewable energy. And you are fucktarded if you don't think it's a good idea to invest in it.
It's too bad the GOP is bought off by big oil so they are scared about the green new deal and peddle lies and bullshit about it. And you eat it up. -
So the GOP is bought off by big oil and one of the biggest talking points for Rats since 2012 is how Obama increased oil production in the US. Interesting.2001400ex said:
No the climate change deal won't happen overnight. And honestly we need to be tougher on China and India and shit or what we do won't matter.PurpleThrobber said:
So the lefties used to run the moral equivalence play to no end.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
Now it’s the space time continuum equivalence angle. Because 8 years of deficits = 800 years of climate change.
Brilliant.
But if we don't start doing something now, we might get left behind. I'd rather be in the forefront of renewable energy. And you are fucktarded if you don't think it's a good idea to invest in it.
It's too bad the GOP is bought off by big oil so they are scared about the green new deal and peddle lies and bullshit about it. And you eat it up.
-
Why do the people who are always claiming to be so smart come off as mouthy fucking morons. Go ahead Kunt, inform us on how you plan on paying for all the shit AOC is advocating for.MariotaTheGawd said:
Why is it the dumbest, loudest people are always the ones claiming to understand human nature and economics? It's almost like a mating callSFGbob said:
Anyone with even understanding of economics, human nature, and an ounce of integrity. So pretty much everyone that isn't a committed leftist. They are cultists. This is their religion. And like most religious people their beliefs are based upon faith, not on a tangible reality or facts.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
"Guys, over here! I read part of Atlas Shrugged and skimmed Milton Friedman's wikipedia entry too!" -
Are China and India on board? If not, it doesn't matter at all.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs. -
This.Doogles said:
Are China and India on board? If not, it doesn't matter at all.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs. -
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
-
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy? -
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el. -
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
-
Yeah he thinks the only tax that is close to acceptable is a sales tax.MariotaTheGawd said:
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy? -
I had a libertarian phase when I was like 20 and just wanted weed to be legal. I guess some people never grow out of it.2001400ex said:
Yeah he thinks the only tax that is close to acceptable is a sales tax.MariotaTheGawd said:
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy? -
A
That’s not what I said. Idiot and liar2001400ex said:
Yeah he thinks the only tax that is close to acceptable is a sales tax.MariotaTheGawd said:
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy? -
MariotaTheGawd said:
Not libertarian. Classical liberal. But you probably don’t know what that is without googling it real quick.2001400ex said:
Yeah he thinks the only tax that is close to acceptable is a sales tax.MariotaTheGawd said:
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
I had a libertarian phase when I was like 20 and just wanted weed to be legal. I guess some people never grow out of it. -
Oh my god he really pulled the "Well actually I'm a classical liberal"
Incredible -
A leftist without an original thought. And no argument. You and Hondo should be fast friends. Giving each other logical fallacy reach arounds.MariotaTheGawd said: Oh my god he really pulled the "Well actually I'm a classical liberal"
Incredible
-
That Hondo's entire act. He is fucking murder on the strawman ass fuck.MikeDamone said:A
That’s not what I said. Idiot and liar2001400ex said:
Yeah he thinks the only tax that is close to acceptable is a sales tax.MariotaTheGawd said:
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy? -
You are right. You said a sales tax is the only tax you can tolerate.. And taxing productivity is fucktarded.MikeDamone said:A
That’s not what I said. Idiot and liar2001400ex said:
Yeah he thinks the only tax that is close to acceptable is a sales tax.MariotaTheGawd said:
Oh god, a libertarian. I'd legit rather read what the senile Trump worshipers have to sayMikeDamone said:
Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
Do you not like the sound of it when repeated back to you? -
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
