PM to AOCfs
Comments
-
Math is hard
-
It took a meme for you to realize that?
Question is, have you ever voted for a politician actually willing to cut expenditures? Race voted for Clinton. Obama kinda did with the fake sequester thing. Anyone else? -
-
Fuck off.2001400ex said:It took a meme for you to realize that?
Question is, have you ever voted for a politician actually willing to cut expenditures? Race voted for Clinton. Obama kinda did with the fake sequester thing. Anyone else? -
You sound scared
-
Wow. Can you imagine how much you have to love the taste of Obama's dick to claim that a guy who added $10T to our national debt in 8 years "kinda" cut spending.2001400ex said:It took a meme for you to realize that?
Question is, have you ever voted for a politician actually willing to cut expenditures? Race voted for Clinton. Obama kinda did with the fake sequester thing. Anyone else?
Obama had what was it, 5 years where he ran an annual trillion dollar budget deficit? To credit him with cutting spending in anyway takes cock sucking to entire new level.
Obama's deficit would have been even larger if Congress had passed the budgets he was requesting. His spending was so reckless his own party rejected his budgets when they held the Senate because it spent too much.
Suck long, suck hard, suck proud cocksucker. -
Read what I wrote. Nice rant anyway. Hope you had a spare keyboard.SFGbob said:
Wow. Can you imagine how much you have to love the taste of Obama's dick to claim that a guy who added $10T to our national debt in 8 years "kinda" cut spending.2001400ex said:It took a meme for you to realize that?
Question is, have you ever voted for a politician actually willing to cut expenditures? Race voted for Clinton. Obama kinda did with the fake sequester thing. Anyone else?
Obama had what was it, 5 years where he ran an annual trillion dollar budget deficit? To credit him with cutting spending in anyway takes cock sucking to entire new level.
Obama's deficit would have been even larger if Congress had passed the budgets he was requesting. His spending was so reckless his own party rejected his budgets when they held the Senate because it spent too much.
Suck long, suck hard, suck proud cocksucker. -
I did read it. In fact I fucking quoted it. Unlike you Hondo I actually respond to what people say.
You claimed that Obama, a guy who added $10T to our deficit, “kinda” cut spending.
I didn’t think a human was capable of taking a dick that deep down their throat. -
Since we've posted this fact dozens of times it didn't take a meme2001400ex said:It took a meme for you to realize that?
Question is, have you ever voted for a politician actually willing to cut expenditures? Race voted for Clinton. Obama kinda did with the fake sequester thing. Anyone else?
-
1) Obama didn't add $10 trillion to the deficit.SFGbob said:I did read it. In fact I fucking quoted it. Unlike you Hondo I actually respond to what people say.
You claimed that Obama, a guy who added $10T to our deficit, “kinda” cut spending.
I didn’t think a human was capable of taking a dick that deep down their throat.
2) learn the difference between deficit and debt.
3) you can cut spending and increase the deficit.
4) you can cut spending and add to the debt.
5) you remember the sequester? Hence why I said kinda.
6) spending did go down somewhat.
Talk in facts before you destroy another keyboard. -
Is that what your news source (Hillary et al) told you?2001400ex said:
1) Obama didn't add $10 trillion to the deficit.SFGbob said:I did read it. In fact I fucking quoted it. Unlike you Hondo I actually respond to what people say.
You claimed that Obama, a guy who added $10T to our deficit, “kinda” cut spending.
I didn’t think a human was capable of taking a dick that deep down their throat.
2) learn the difference between deficit and debt.
3) you can cut spending and increase the deficit.
4) you can cut spending and add to the debt.
5) you remember the sequester? Hence why I said kinda.
6) spending did go down somewhat.
Talk in facts before you destroy another keyboard.
Of course it is you fucking #clockworkshill. Another in a long line of examples why you should kill yourself. -
Hondo the stupid Kunt believes that if you start putting an additional $100k a year on your credit cards and then you reduce it to $70k a year you’ve “cut” your spending.
And here I didn’t think you could get that dick any further down your throat -
Republicans did great job in cutting spending for the 18 budget.SFGbob said:Hondo the stupid Kunt believes that if you start putting an additional $100k a year on your credit cards and then you reduce it to $70k a year you’ve “cut” your spending.
And here I didn’t think you could get that dick any further down your throat -
Pawz hates facts.pawz said:
Is that what your news source (Hillary et al) told you?2001400ex said:
1) Obama didn't add $10 trillion to the deficit.SFGbob said:I did read it. In fact I fucking quoted it. Unlike you Hondo I actually respond to what people say.
You claimed that Obama, a guy who added $10T to our deficit, “kinda” cut spending.
I didn’t think a human was capable of taking a dick that deep down their throat.
2) learn the difference between deficit and debt.
3) you can cut spending and increase the deficit.
4) you can cut spending and add to the debt.
5) you remember the sequester? Hence why I said kinda.
6) spending did go down somewhat.
Talk in facts before you destroy another keyboard.
Of course it is you fucking #clockworkshill. Another in a long line of examples why you should kill yourself. -
Hey Kunt, did you hear me talking about how Republicans “kinda” cut spending?2001400ex said:
Republicans did great job in cutting spending for the 18 budget.SFGbob said:Hondo the stupid Kunt believes that if you start putting an additional $100k a year on your credit cards and then you reduce it to $70k a year you’ve “cut” your spending.
And here I didn’t think you could get that dick any further down your throat
I don’t enjoy lying and swallowing like a bitch Hondo, you do. -
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country. -
But you have the same hate for Republicans for adding to the debt as you do Obama.SFGbob said:
Hey Kunt, did you hear me talking about how Republicans “kinda” cut spending?2001400ex said:
Republicans did great job in cutting spending for the 18 budget.SFGbob said:Hondo the stupid Kunt believes that if you start putting an additional $100k a year on your credit cards and then you reduce it to $70k a year you’ve “cut” your spending.
And here I didn’t think you could get that dick any further down your throat
I don’t enjoy lying and swallowing like a bitch Hondo, you do. -
allpurpleallgold said:
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom. -
Obama doubled the debt. Sorry was it 9.9 trillion?
-
I do.2001400ex said:
But you have the same hate for Republicans for adding to the debt as you do Obama.SFGbob said:
Hey Kunt, did you hear me talking about how Republicans “kinda” cut spending?2001400ex said:
Republicans did great job in cutting spending for the 18 budget.SFGbob said:Hondo the stupid Kunt believes that if you start putting an additional $100k a year on your credit cards and then you reduce it to $70k a year you’ve “cut” your spending.
And here I didn’t think you could get that dick any further down your throat
I don’t enjoy lying and swallowing like a bitch Hondo, you do.
Also, fuck off. -
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?2001400ex said:allpurpleallgold said:We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Ergo decedo
Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents
In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?"
Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!" -
Are you knew hear?MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?2001400ex said:allpurpleallgold said:We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Ergo decedo
Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents
In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?"
Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!" -
2001400ex said:
Are you knew hear?MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?2001400ex said:allpurpleallgold said:We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Ergo decedo
Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents
In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?"
Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it! -
So Hondo's now gone from the "read what I wrote" Kunt act, back to his claim that Obama really did "cut" spending, and then to but, but, but the Republicans to some bullshit about how I don't have as much hate for Republican deficits as I do for Rat party deficits.
Hondo, if anyone here were claiming that Republicans "kinda" cut spending I'd have just as much "hate" for them as I do for you when you try to push that bullshit.
I'm not claiming the GOP "kinda" cut spending Kunt, but you are claiming Obama, who never had a single budget that reduced government spending, "kinda" cut spending.
Your problem Hondo is that you believe everyone else is a partisan shill just like yourself. You're the fucking hack who can't even say if Hillary lied about her emails Hondo. I'm not a zero integrity piece of shit like you Hondo, you need to stop assuming that everyone else is just like you. -
Well corruption and crony capitalism are enforced in India. And which conservatives are arguing for no regulations? That's right, none. Keep phu*cking that strawman ass.
-
Hey fuckstick. I didn't say move to India. I said go to India. Spend a week there. That's all you'll need. Or visit any other country that has shit for regulations and low taxes. And libertarian principles that you want.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you knew hear?MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?2001400ex said:allpurpleallgold said:We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Ergo decedo
Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents
In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?"
Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it!
Look, I don't like government more than anyone else. But we do need some regulations. We do need a lot of the services the government provides.
There is a laundry list of reasons America is the most productive country. The main one being we had the resources to be self sufficient early in the industrial age to give us a leg up. One other item is the growth in infrastructure that provide clean water and electricity. And the Government taking over the post office and building interstates for easy transportation of goods and communication.
Libertarians like you would have waited for the private sector to build roads and schools and shit. Go to a country built like that for a week and tell me how you like it. -
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
-
So 30 years later they just need more tim to get their guys in there.SFGbob said:Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
-
Who would go to a country where they shit on the street and it runs into the same river they dump all their dead bodies of both people and animals and then they drink, wash and bathe in it? Who would eat that fucking food? Who would sleep in anything they washed?2001400ex said:
Hey fuckstick. I didn't say move to India. I said go to India. Spend a week there. That's all you'll need. Or visit any other country that has shit for regulations and low taxes. And libertarian principles that you want.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you knew hear?MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?2001400ex said:allpurpleallgold said:We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Ergo decedo
Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents
In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?"
Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it!
Look, I don't like government more than anyone else. But we do need some regulations. We do need a lot of the services the government provides.
There is a laundry list of reasons America is the most productive country. The main one being we had the resources to be self sufficient early in the industrial age to give us a leg up. One other item is the growth in infrastructure that provide clean water and electricity. And the Government taking over the post office and building interstates for easy transportation of goods and communication.
Libertarians like you would have waited for the private sector to build roads and schools and shit. Go to a country built like that for a week and tell me how you like it.
Probably why Hondo suffered so much brain damage.
