Hondo the stupid Kunt believes that if you start putting an additional $100k a year on your credit cards and then you reduce it to $70k a year you’ve “cut” your spending.
And here I didn’t think you could get that dick any further down your throat
Republicans did great job in cutting spending for the 18 budget.
Hey Kunt, did you hear me talking about how Republicans “kinda” cut spending?
I don’t enjoy lying and swallowing like a bitch Hondo, you do.
But you have the same hate for Republicans for adding to the debt as you do Obama.
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?
Ergo decedo Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?" Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?
Ergo decedo Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?" Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?
Ergo decedo Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?" Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
So Hondo's now gone from the "read what I wrote" Kunt act, back to his claim that Obama really did "cut" spending, and then to but, but, but the Republicans to some bullshit about how I don't have as much hate for Republican deficits as I do for Rat party deficits.
Hondo, if anyone here were claiming that Republicans "kinda" cut spending I'd have just as much "hate" for them as I do for you when you try to push that bullshit.
I'm not claiming the GOP "kinda" cut spending Kunt, but you are claiming Obama, who never had a single budget that reduced government spending, "kinda" cut spending.
Your problem Hondo is that you believe everyone else is a partisan shill just like yourself. You're the fucking hack who can't even say if Hillary lied about her emails Hondo. I'm not a zero integrity piece of shit like you Hondo, you need to stop assuming that everyone else is just like you.
Well corruption and crony capitalism are enforced in India. And which conservatives are arguing for no regulations? That's right, none. Keep phu*cking that strawman ass.
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?
Ergo decedo Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?" Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
Are you knew hear?
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it!
Hey fuckstick. I didn't say move to India. I said go to India. Spend a week there. That's all you'll need. Or visit any other country that has shit for regulations and low taxes. And libertarian principles that you want.
Look, I don't like government more than anyone else. But we do need some regulations. We do need a lot of the services the government provides.
There is a laundry list of reasons America is the most productive country. The main one being we had the resources to be self sufficient early in the industrial age to give us a leg up. One other item is the growth in infrastructure that provide clean water and electricity. And the Government taking over the post office and building interstates for easy transportation of goods and communication.
Libertarians like you would have waited for the private sector to build roads and schools and shit. Go to a country built like that for a week and tell me how you like it.
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
So 30 years later they just need more tim to get their guys in there.
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?
Ergo decedo Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?" Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
Are you knew hear?
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it!
Hey fuckstick. I didn't say move to India. I said go to India. Spend a week there. That's all you'll need. Or visit any other country that has shit for regulations and low taxes. And libertarian principles that you want.
Look, I don't like government more than anyone else. But we do need some regulations. We do need a lot of the services the government provides.
There is a laundry list of reasons America is the most productive country. The main one being we had the resources to be self sufficient early in the industrial age to give us a leg up. One other item is the growth in infrastructure that provide clean water and electricity. And the Government taking over the post office and building interstates for easy transportation of goods and communication.
Libertarians like you would have waited for the private sector to build roads and schools and shit. Go to a country built like that for a week and tell me how you like it.
Who would go to a country where they shit on the street and it runs into the same river they dump all their dead bodies of both people and animals and then they drink, wash and bathe in it? Who would eat that fucking food? Who would sleep in anything they washed?
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
In defense of India, I'm hearing they have the safest Muslim temples in the world.
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
Hey dumbfuck, do you ever actually have an argument?
Ergo decedo Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?" Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent "Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
Are you knew hear?
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it!
Hey fuckstick. I didn't say move to India. I said go to India. Spend a week there. That's all you'll need. Or visit any other country that has shit for regulations and low taxes. And libertarian principles that you want.
Look, I don't like government more than anyone else. But we do need some regulations. We do need a lot of the services the government provides.
There is a laundry list of reasons America is the most productive country. The main one being we had the resources to be self sufficient early in the industrial age to give us a leg up. One other item is the growth in infrastructure that provide clean water and electricity. And the Government taking over the post office and building interstates for easy transportation of goods and communication.
Libertarians like you would have waited for the private sector to build roads and schools and shit. Go to a country built like that for a week and tell me how you like it.
Who would go to a country where they shit on the street and it runs into the same river they dump all their dead bodies of both people and animals and then they drink, wash and bathe in it? Who would eat that fucking food? Who would sleep in anything they washed?
We’re willing to cut military spending and stop spending on endless wars.
We’ve proposed Medicare For All. Even the Koch brothers study has that saving Americans trillions of dollar.
Those are two of the big three and anyone that goes after Social Security just loses. All the right does is nip at the heels of the the alleged problem by cutting programs that help people.
I understand how simple and appealing libertarianism feels. But for all the hate socialism get for having never worked, no one has ever even bothered to try a libertarian country.
Go to India. It's wonderful. No regulations that are enforced sure is freedom.
In defense of India, I'm hearing they have the safest Muslim temples in the world.
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
So 30 years later they just need more tim to get their guys in there.
30 years later and they've moved as many people out of poverty as there are currently living in the US.
Check out the nearly flat-line GDP under Hondo's Socialism and then compare it to free market capitalism. That's the kind of economic vitality Hondo wants for the US.
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
So 30 years later they just need more tim to get their guys in there.
30 years later and they've moved as many people out of poverty as there are currently living in the US.
Check out the nearly flat-line GDP under Hondo's Socialism and then compare it to free market capitalism. That's the kind of economic vitality Hondo wants for the US.
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
So 30 years later they just need more tim to get their guys in there.
30 years later and they've moved as many people out of poverty as there are currently living in the US.
Check out the nearly flat-line GDP under Hondo's Socialism and then compare it to free market capitalism. That's the kind of economic vitality Hondo wants for the US.
Indian was a socialist country far longer than it's been a capitalist economy and any improvements in the quality of life and the Indian economy have all come since they've rejected Socialism.
So 30 years later they just need more tim to get their guys in there.
30 years later and they've moved as many people out of poverty as there are currently living in the US.
Check out the nearly flat-line GDP under Hondo's Socialism and then compare it to free market capitalism. That's the kind of economic vitality Hondo wants for the US.
They also have 3 times the population yet 1/8 the GDP.
Not to mention you lack context of how much their population grew in that period compared to us.
Fuck you are stupid and not even attempting to argue the point.
Not to mention that Hondo fucks a little strawman ass and doesn't refute a fucking word I said. There population growth compared to ours has nothing to do with what I said Kunt. India is poised to become the 5th largest economy in the world and will over take Germany for the 4th spot if they maintain their growth which has been averaging 7% a year.
They were a fucking economic basket case with anemic growth during almost the entire period when they were under Socialism. They never had growth anywhere near what they've been enjoying the last 15 years.
You struggle with context too. Walls work!!!! Revenues went up!!!!!
Walls do work. The goal of a wall isn't to keep everyone out forever. The goal of a wall is to slow people who are trying to illegally enter this country so they can be apprehended.
The Walls in San Diego and El Paso definitely work and there isn't a person working for the Border Patrol who will say otherwise.
Now tell us again how the annual 7% growth in GDP that India has had over the last 15 years is really bad for them and that they'd be better off with Socialism Hondo.
Comments
Also, fuck off.
Ergo decedo
Ergo decedo, Latin for "therefore leave" or "then go off", a truncation of argumentum ergo decedo, and colloquially denominated the traitorous critic fallacy,[1] denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy impliedly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.[2]
Argumentum ergo decedo is generally categorized as a species of informal fallacy and more specifically as a species of the subclass of ad hominem informal fallacies.
Contents
In politics Edit
Argumentum ergo decedo is directly related to the tu quoque fallacy when responding to political criticism. As whataboutism is used against external criticism, ergo decedo is used against internal criticism.
Examples Edit
Critic: "I think we need to work on improving Nauru's taxation system. The current system suffers from multiple issues that have been resolved in other places such as Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like it, why don't you just leave and go somewhere you think is better?"
Critic: "Our office's atmosphere is unsuitable for starting constructive conversations about reforms for the future of the company. A number of improvements are needed."
Respondent
"Well, if you don't like the corporate system, then why are you here? You should just leave!"
So you don’t ever have an argument. Got it!
Hondo, if anyone here were claiming that Republicans "kinda" cut spending I'd have just as much "hate" for them as I do for you when you try to push that bullshit.
I'm not claiming the GOP "kinda" cut spending Kunt, but you are claiming Obama, who never had a single budget that reduced government spending, "kinda" cut spending.
Your problem Hondo is that you believe everyone else is a partisan shill just like yourself. You're the fucking hack who can't even say if Hillary lied about her emails Hondo. I'm not a zero integrity piece of shit like you Hondo, you need to stop assuming that everyone else is just like you.
Look, I don't like government more than anyone else. But we do need some regulations. We do need a lot of the services the government provides.
There is a laundry list of reasons America is the most productive country. The main one being we had the resources to be self sufficient early in the industrial age to give us a leg up. One other item is the growth in infrastructure that provide clean water and electricity. And the Government taking over the post office and building interstates for easy transportation of goods and communication.
Libertarians like you would have waited for the private sector to build roads and schools and shit. Go to a country built like that for a week and tell me how you like it.
Probably why Hondo suffered so much brain damage.
Check out the nearly flat-line GDP under Hondo's Socialism and then compare it to free market capitalism. That's the kind of economic vitality Hondo wants for the US.
source: tradingeconomics.com
Not to mention you lack context of how much their population grew in that period compared to us.
Fuck you are stupid and not even attempting to argue the point.
They were a fucking economic basket case with anemic growth during almost the entire period when they were under Socialism. They never had growth anywhere near what they've been enjoying the last 15 years.
A tell when hondo gets his ass handed to him
The Walls in San Diego and El Paso definitely work and there isn't a person working for the Border Patrol who will say otherwise.
Now tell us again how the annual 7% growth in GDP that India has had over the last 15 years is really bad for them and that they'd be better off with Socialism Hondo.