Constitution scholar heard from
Comments
-
What a dolt. This simplistic soft brained approach to the Amendment has been used a million times by a millions dummies like Adolph, but they can never get away from the massive amount of writings on the subject done by the people who wrote that Amendment that clearly show exactly what the intent was. So they try to pick it apart in the lawyerly way that slip and fall cucks do, and ignore all logic and history. It's tortured but simplistic, perfect for progressives who have no ability for second or third order thought.Bob_C said:Cenk gets abused on this thread.
-
You’re a waste of good oxygen.HHusky said: -
Well I did know that, and I've been to the scene.Sledog said:Lets just agree that the founders didn't just return from a deer hunt. They had just liberated a nation from a tyrannical government! They were only able to do so because the populace had arms and militias.
Most people don't know the shot heard around the world was due to an attempt by the Brits to disarm the colonists. They were marching to seize arms and powder stores.
We are free because of armed men who were brave enough to say "Enough" and "Never".
BidenBros say control me more daddy!
Scalia treated "well-regulated militia" as having no effect whatsoever.
That's not proper interpretation of any written document. -
what tangent?HoustonHusky said:
Shocker that @HeilHusky comes out defending a guy in favor of legalizing bestiality…HHusky said:
By the other scholars, no doubt.Bob_C said:Cenk gets abused on this thread.
-
He can't be that dumb. Oh, nevermind.
-
What dies "well regulated" in the 2A.HHusky said:
Well I did know that, and I've been to the scene.Sledog said:Lets just agree that the founders didn't just return from a deer hunt. They had just liberated a nation from a tyrannical government! They were only able to do so because the populace had arms and militias.
Most people don't know the shot heard around the world was due to an attempt by the Brits to disarm the colonists. They were marching to seize arms and powder stores.
We are free because of armed men who were brave enough to say "Enough" and "Never".
BidenBros say control me more daddy!
Scalia treated "well-regulated militia" as having no effect whatsoever.
That's not proper interpretation of any written document.
Use your own words, Betty -
Which part, that you our resident bored nazi is advocating suppressing the constitutional rights of the population for stricter government control, or that you are doing it by defending a guy that has also previously advocated for the legalization of bestiality?HHusky said:
what tangent?HoustonHusky said:
Shocker that @HeilHusky comes out defending a guy in favor of legalizing bestiality…HHusky said:
By the other scholars, no doubt.Bob_C said:Cenk gets abused on this thread.
-
It meant a citizen soldier militia that would avoid any necessity for a standing army. You might well be expected to defend the country; it wasn’t written to allow you to overthrow the government. It wasn’t about an individual right to own guns.MikeDamone said:
What dies "well regulated" in the 2A.HHusky said:
Well I did know that, and I've been to the scene.Sledog said:Lets just agree that the founders didn't just return from a deer hunt. They had just liberated a nation from a tyrannical government! They were only able to do so because the populace had arms and militias.
Most people don't know the shot heard around the world was due to an attempt by the Brits to disarm the colonists. They were marching to seize arms and powder stores.
We are free because of armed men who were brave enough to say "Enough" and "Never".
BidenBros say control me more daddy!
Scalia treated "well-regulated militia" as having no effect whatsoever.
That's not proper interpretation of any written document.
Use your own words, Betty
Scalia was a selective “originalist”. -
-
Finally you posted something that makes sense, madamHHusky said:*
