Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We will be podding on Saturday morning

24

Comments

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,140 Founders Club
    rodmansrage said:

    @DerekJohnson you want me to dm you another link to one of my songs? got this new mixtape that fiyaaaaa!

    It turns out you lied to me. You had said The Final Countdown was one of your original compositions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,739 Founders Club
    edited May 2022
    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,140 Founders Club
    haie said:

    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

    I was wondering that myself
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,858 Founders Club
    haie said:

    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

    If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,739 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    haie said:

    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

    If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
    I can see that, but that would suck.

    I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    DerekJohnson said:

    greenblood said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.

    The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.
    Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.
    How much of that is Sven?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited May 2022
    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

    I was wondering that myself
    Probably go by rankings
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited May 2022
    haie said:

    Doogles said:

    haie said:

    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

    If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
    I can see that, but that would suck.

    I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid.
    I hate common opponent. Because one team puts on a chokehold and beats the Beavs by say 40. Another team steps off the gas and wins by 28. Do you want to penalize the team that won by 28 instead of 40?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,614 Swaye's Wigwam
    Doogles said:

    haie said:

    If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

    2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

    Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

    If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
    That is exactly what they will do, and is why they are doing this in the 1st place.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter