We will be podding on Saturday morning
Also, whatever that game was that @Swaye wanted us to play.
Comments
-
DerekJohnson said:
We'll be discussing the new Pac-12 Title Game format.
Also, whatever that game was that @Swaye wanted us to play.
-
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
Even though it’s been a big lull in the history of the program I still look forward to doing the podcast every time.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
You've got a good crew of north end, hillbilly, side kicks.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
HH is the best after a coug lossgreenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
DerekJohnson said:
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
Hello? Can I get some FOGHAT TALK?!?! I'm done asking!
-
@DerekJohnson you want me to dm you another link to one of my songs? got this new mixtape that fiyaaaaa!
-
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
It turns out you lied to me. You had said The Final Countdown was one of your original compositions.rodmansrage said:@DerekJohnson you want me to dm you another link to one of my songs? got this new mixtape that fiyaaaaa!
-
I'm actually hearing that subscriptions are higher than everDerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other. -
I was wondering that myselfhaie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other. -
If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other. -
I can see that, but that would suck.Doogles said:
If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid. -
How much of that is Sven?DerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
Probably go by rankingsDerekJohnson said:
I was wondering that myselfhaie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other. -
I hate common opponent. Because one team puts on a chokehold and beats the Beavs by say 40. Another team steps off the gas and wins by 28. Do you want to penalize the team that won by 28 instead of 40?haie said:
I can see that, but that would suck.Doogles said:
If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid. -
That is exactly what they will do, and is why they are doing this in the 1st place.Doogles said:
If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other. -
Well the Seattle Times article said that it would be based on conference winning percentagegodawgst said:
That is exactly what they will do, and is why they are doing this in the 1st place.Doogles said:
If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other. -
From the PAC-12 news release, 2016 would still be UW vs Colorado but the 2018 game would be an Apple Cup rematch.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
https://pac-12.com/article/2022/05/18/pac-12-announces-change-football-championship-game-format -
Astronomers refer to 2018 as a Haley's Comet MomentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
From the PAC-12 news release, 2016 would still be UW vs Colorado but the 2018 game would be an Apple Cup rematch.haie said:If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?
2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.
Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
https://pac-12.com/article/2022/05/18/pac-12-announces-change-football-championship-game-format -
What does this say about your family and friends?JoeEDangerously said:
Even though it’s been a big lull in the history of the program I still look forward to doing the podcast every time.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Also, when I first read that, I thought it said "Iuli" in the history of the program and I was trying to remember if the Dawgs ended up signing Straw Hat Vita. -
Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.DerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
-
Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.DerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.
Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game -
What conference did Oregon State drop to?haie said:
Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.DerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.
Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game -
Wherever Idaho dropped to.1to392831weretaken said:
What conference did Oregon State drop to?haie said:
Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.DerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.
Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game -
Haie has NEVER and I repeat NEVER been accused of having even the slightest tiny bit of intelligence. hth1to392831weretaken said:
What conference did Oregon State drop to?haie said:
Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.DerekJohnson said:
Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.greenblood said:
The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.DerekJohnson said:Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.
Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game -
I'd like to send a shout out to @MikeDamone for being right / correct.
I'd also like to send a shout out to @PurpleBaze for his massive dong. Little did they know back in 2004 but Saddams WMD were in a pair of husky sweatpants, in a smoke shop in Seatac.
