Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Michigan Kidnapping case blows up in the Government's face
Comments
-
Being enticed into a plot planned by the FBI?HHusky said:
You do know an entrapment defense means they admit they did what they were accused of, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:In other words, H believes they are guilty despite being acquitted.
You know, in contrast to the burden of evidence he desires for the Biden corruption case.
Is that where you want to go with this? Think hard about it now. -
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
-
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal." -
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work. -
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something. -
Like Eve.Sledog said:
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something. -
But trust him, he'd never pad his legal bills. Wouldn't be ethical.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work. -
No like waving them in to the capitol.HHusky said:
Like Eve.Sledog said:
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something. -
Yeah, riiiigghhht.Sledog said:
No like waving them in to the capitol.HHusky said:
Like Eve.Sledog said:
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something.
-
Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
