Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Michigan Kidnapping case blows up in the Government's face
Comments
-
Only somebody as stupid as you would think the Government had a case worthy of prosecution.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
When there are more FBI agents and informants than “bad guys” and the lead FBI agent is fired incident to a domestic violence incident with his spouse, blame it on the jury . . . What law school did you go to again, dumbkopf?
Big news splash when arrests went down.
Where was the news coverage afterwards? -
-
Funny you say that…PurpleThrobber said:
Like Capitol police officers holding the door open for 'trespassers'.SFGbob said:
Pretend they're Muslim terrorists Dazzler and then you might be able to gin up your siutational rage about Government entrapment.HHusky said:
Who said it isn't a defense? You might want one of these guys to marry your sister now.WestlinnDuck said:
There you go. There was no violent felony. And if you had gone to law school you would have learned that entrapment is an actual defense. I pity your mythical clients.HHusky said:
fly speck superiority guyWestlinnDuck said:
What violent felony? I didn't know the governor was physically assaulted and kidnapped. Gotta link? Geezus you suck at this.HHusky said:
"I was merely entrapped into plotting a violent felony."
He will be promoted yet again for his continued corruption…
-
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
So why weren't they convicted consuelo?HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base. -
Someone talked them into it, Inspector.Sledog said:
So why weren't they convicted consuelo?HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Do try to keep up.
