It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something.
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something.
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
But trust him, he'd never pad his legal bills. Wouldn't be ethical.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something.
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something.
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
Wasn't someone just complaining about non-responsiveness?
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
Did you read the linked article from Buzzfeed? Just a rhetorical question. Of course you didn’t. STFU.
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.
That's not entrapment, dumbshit.
Wrong link. Also answer me on who unlocked the megneticilly sealed doors and why are they withholding 14,000 hours of video from that day?
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
Wasn't someone just complaining about non-responsiveness?
FBI comes up with plot to kidnap governor.
FBI tries to convince yokels to go along with plot.
Mostly fails at it.
FBI then makes arrests and a big show in the media lies there asses off to run cover.
Yeah, we should all be concerned about the yokels in this equation. Sure.gif
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.
That's not entrapment, dumbshit.
Wrong link. Also answer me on who unlocked the megneticilly sealed doors and why are they withholding 14,000 hours of video from that day?
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.
pathetic losers = Daddy's base
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
Wasn't someone just complaining about non-responsiveness?
FBI comes up with plot to kidnap governor.
FBI tries to convince yokels to go along with plot.
Mostly fails at it.
FBI then makes arrests and a big show in the media lies there asses off to run cover.
Yeah, we should all be concerned about the yokels in this equation. Sure.gif
J Edgar Hoover fan heard from.
There's good reason to believe that the FBI was doing this in order to generate the negative headlines regarding Trump right before the election. Remember the reporting on this story when it first broke.
Comments
Is that where you want to go with this? Think hard about it now.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
That's not entrapment, dumbshit.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
https://rumble.com/vhcuax-capitol-hill-protesters-yelling-for-peaceful-protests-after-being-let-in.html
FBI tries to convince yokels to go along with plot.
Mostly fails at it.
FBI then makes arrests and a big show in the media lies there asses off to run cover.
Yeah, we should all be concerned about the yokels in this equation. Sure.gif
J Edgar Hoover fan heard from.