Michigan Kidnapping case blows up in the Government's face
Comments
-
At the time the FBI announced the charges in October 2020, with the presidential campaign at a crucial point, Biden suggested that the defendants were white supremacists, and that Trump was at fault for the plot:
There is no place for hate in America. And both of us [including Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) have been talking about this for some time, about how white supremacists and these militias area a genuine threat. I want to compliment the FBI and the police agencies for what they did, and how they stepped up. But look –the words of a president matter. Whether they can — you’ve heard me say this before. They can cause a nation to have th market rise or fall, go to war or bring peace, but they can also breathe oxygen into those who are filled with hate and danger, and I just think It’s got to stop. The president has to realize the words he utters matter.
There was no evidence at the time tying Trump to the plot whatsoever, nor did any such evidence emerge during the trial. -
The narrative remains undefeated.SFGbob said:At the time the FBI announced the charges in October 2020, with the presidential campaign at a crucial point, Biden suggested that the defendants were white supremacists, and that Trump was at fault for the plot:
There is no place for hate in America. And both of us [including Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) have been talking about this for some time, about how white supremacists and these militias area a genuine threat. I want to compliment the FBI and the police agencies for what they did, and how they stepped up. But look –the words of a president matter. Whether they can — you’ve heard me say this before. They can cause a nation to have th market rise or fall, go to war or bring peace, but they can also breathe oxygen into those who are filled with hate and danger, and I just think It’s got to stop. The president has to realize the words he utters matter.
There was no evidence at the time tying Trump to the plot whatsoever, nor did any such evidence emerge during the trial.
I'm doubtful that changes. It's gonna get weird at some point without any accountability.
The most damaging thing happening in the world right now is the 24/hr news cycle and the establishments ability to get to memory hole the past.
Wake the fuck up people. -
Mayhem. Sounds serious and untrue. Fuck off.HHusky said:
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.Sledog said:Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
That's not entrapment, dumbshit. -
The amazing part about this is that much of the evidence showing the FBI’s malfeasance wasn’t even allowed in court…the judge ruled most of the texts and transcripts of all the crazy FBI employees pushing this conspiracy couldn’t be introduced because it was “hearsay”, and that several of the FBI employees’ criminal history (one agent had been credibly accused of perjury in a previous case, the other one fired after arresting these schmoes because he beat his wife at a swinger’s party) couldn’t be heard by the jury either.
And the jury still found the FBI entrapped them. That is how egregious it was. -
-
Gee it’s almost like the whole thing was coordinated from jumpstreet. Naw.RaceBannon said: -
So Dazzler believes there are no chargeable "Attempted..." crimes. Got it.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Dazzler continues to Dazzle. -
Careful. Mens Rea is miles beyond the Dazzler's grasp.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
Eve should have had a better lawyer.TurdBomber said:
So Dazzler believes there are no chargeable "Attempted..." crimes. Got it.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Dazzler continues to Dazzle. -
And there's the vintage Dazzler weasel, right there.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
