Kinda left scratching my head. huskies are excited because the new DL coach coached Mack and Darnold, but didn't uw have a coach that coached Vea, Qualls, Gains, Shelton, and ZTF?! And the new coach is from the Islands, which could help with the poly players, but so was the last guy, and that didn’t seem to help. Seems like the same just different name. Guess coming from Vanderbilt is better than ‘an assistant to the running back coach’…maybe.
By your flawed logic we should have gotten Choate who recruited all of these studs
Choate recruited Vea and Gaines, none of the others listed though.
But yeah, @dOgmaster's post doesn't make any sense.
Vea and Gaines are our best DL in the last 2 decades. Should have hired Choate ftw
I thought tosh served up vea on a platter for choate. Was I under recruited and needed some work academically through the process and choate got the tap in. Maybe I am remembering wrong.
Hot take: vea was never that dominant until his last season and then wasn’t consistent every game. Dominated Oregon and WSU: was just ok against penn state. Just really starting to unlock his true potential with nfl coaching.
Hot take: vea was never that dominant until his last season and then wasn’t consistent every game. Dominated Oregon and WSU: was just ok against penn state. Just really starting to unlock his true potential with nfl coaching.
Agree he's unlocked more potential there but I think you're underrating him at UW by quite a bit.
Hot take: vea was never that dominant until his last season and then wasn’t consistent every game. Dominated Oregon and WSU: was just ok against penn state. Just really starting to unlock his true potential with nfl coaching.
One of the worst takes I've ever read on this board.
Go back and watch the film doogs (self) . Had dominant games. Not consistent week to week.
dear lord you doogs. This hot take was a stab at the coaching of malloe and kwiat. Not fucking vea... who has become elite in the nfl. reading comprehension is hard.
Hot take: vea was never that dominant until his last season and then wasn’t consistent every game. Dominated Oregon and WSU: was just ok against penn state. Just really starting to unlock his true potential with nfl coaching.
Pretty sure saban had him double teamed for the whole game, but ok
Hot take: vea was never that dominant until his last season and then wasn’t consistent every game. Dominated Oregon and WSU: was just ok against penn state. Just really starting to unlock his true potential with nfl coaching.
Pretty sure saban had him double teamed for the whole game, but ok
Hot take: vea was never that dominant until his last season and then wasn’t consistent every game. Dominated Oregon and WSU: was just ok against penn state. Just really starting to unlock his true potential with nfl coaching.
Pretty sure saban had him double teamed for the whole game, but ok
wouldn't say vea had a bad game in the peach bowl, wouldn't say he dominated either. Had some good plays, still pretty raw overall.
of course the oline (strausser at the time) was the major major issue. Retrospectively, Huff overall is probably an upgrade from strausser.
2016 was a good OL. Depth was dicey and Harris wasn’t ready but it was a very good OL. We were fucking destroying teams up front with Dissly and Sample. Coleman improved a lot but he average like 7.5 ypc and had 800 yards. He’s not doing that unless the OL was dominating, which they did in almost every game.
Clemson’s RB averaged 2.6 ypc in the title game. Nobody was gonna run on that Bama team. The front 7 was loaded. Jonathan Allen, Payne, Tomlinson, D’Shawn Hand, Rueben Foster, the guy that had the pick 6 against us.
Browning lost us that game. Give us Watson or Mariota, or whoever and that OL was good enough to win. It was easily our best OL since 2001.
wouldn't say vea had a bad game in the peach bowl, wouldn't say he dominated either. Had some good plays, still pretty raw overall.
of course the oline (strausser at the time) was the major major issue. Retrospectively, Huff overall is probably an upgrade from strausser.
2016 was a good OL. Depth was dicey and Harris wasn’t ready but it was a very good OL. We were fucking destroying teams up front with Dissly and Sample. Coleman improved a lot but he average like 7.5 ypc and had 800 yards. He’s not doing that unless the OL was dominating, which they did in almost every game.
Clemson’s RB averaged 2.6 ypc in the title game. Nobody was gonna run on that Bama team. The front 7 was loaded. Jonathan Allen, Payne, Tomlinson, D’Shawn Hand, Rueben Foster, the guy that had the pick 6 against us.
Browning lost us that game. Give us Watson or Mariota, or whoever and that OL was good enough to win. It was easily our best OL since 2001.
the oline wasn't good with harris at right guard. once shane brostic went down the season was over. if brostic plays against bama it's a close game
Comments
of course the oline (strausser at the time) was the major major issue. Retrospectively, Huff overall is probably an upgrade from strausser.
Ho lee fuck DJ Beavers was bad
Clemson’s RB averaged 2.6 ypc in the title game. Nobody was gonna run on that Bama team. The front 7 was loaded. Jonathan Allen, Payne, Tomlinson, D’Shawn Hand, Rueben Foster, the guy that had the pick 6 against us.
Browning lost us that game. Give us Watson or Mariota, or whoever and that OL was good enough to win. It was easily our best OL since 2001.