Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stringfellow Status?

135

Comments

  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,705 Founders Club
    I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.

    LIFPO

    Maybe I'm whooshed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    brchco12 said:

    I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.

    LIFPO

    Maybe I'm whooshed.

    Ty wasn't 92-12

    hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    But didn't Ty have to play a ranked Oregon State?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    sarktastic said:

    But didn't Ty have to play a ranked Oregon State?

    Petersen has already conquered a ranked Oregon State.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited April 2014
    brchco12 said:

    I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.

    LIFPO

    Maybe I'm whooshed.

    You misspelled Craig Chambers.

    #ComportmentSuperiorityGuy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Tequilla said:

    Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.

    String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.

    When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Tequilla said:

    Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.

    String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.

    When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
    How is this team going to the Rose Bowl when for months you said can't expect more than seven wins?

    Is this your brother posting now?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Tequilla said:

    Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.

    String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.

    When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
    Every post about the blacks?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Tequilla said:

    Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.

    String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.

    When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
    But how does any of this affect the SEC?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Swaye said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Tequilla said:

    Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.

    String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.

    When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
    But how does any of this affect the SEC?
    How was Emmert a bad president?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter