Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
How is this team going to the Rose Bowl when for months you said can't expect more than seven wins?
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
But how does any of this affect the SEC?
How was Emmert a bad president?
That's my favorite fucktarded Kim question.
My second was after the Arizona blowout in 2012 "But how was that a bad game plan?"
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
But how does any of this affect the SEC?
How was Emmert a bad president?
That's my favorite fucktarded Kim question.
My second was after the Arizona blowout in 2012 "But how was that a bad game plan?"
It was epic because every time 4 or 5 examples of how he sucked was listed, Kim would restate that question. The best part is he was 100% serious.
You forgot the Lars Hansen tweet, Strings insta gram "bye bye Seatle". We all know this guy is going to be a star receiver at USC. This truly sucks, and I would trade cyber miles twice over for String. Miley May be don e as well because he will never see the field under Pete. He will be firmly planted behind The other two who learned the new system
You forgot the Lars Hansen tweet, Strings insta gram "bye bye Seatle". We all know this guy is going to be a star receiver at USC. This truly sucks, and I would trade cyber miles twice over for String. Miley May be don e as well because he will never see the field under Pete. He will be firmly planted behind The other two who learned the new system
Where do you base this on? If Miles is the best guy for the job he'll be the starter. He'll have an entire offseason, fall camp and even the first couple of games to play quick catch up.
What he lacks in learning the system he more than makes up for by actually having some game time experience which the other two don't have.
As for Stringfellow? I think some are reading too much into it. Petersen in an interview even said he doesn't believe in giving guys the boot. He never gave Titus Young the boot and in 2009 during their undefeated season they were top 10 in the nation in arrests.
I think String will be disciplined obviously but not booted. I don't see him playing at USC either. Remember if he chooses to transfer he has to get permission by us to go to another school. So if he goes to USC he'd have to go to a JC for a year then USC.
I think we should be in LIPO mode with regards to Stringfellow.
I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
Ty wasn't 92-12
hth
Yet he lost to Ty
LIFPO because we really don't know what will happen. Losing players sucks, no way to put a positive spin on a shitty situation.
Hi this guy lost to Ty 38-0.
HTH
Exactly, so we all need to LIFPO.
I was just pointing out how Husky fans all dooged it up about how we needed to get the bad apples off the team during Ty's first year, and how this String conversation sounds familiar. I'd rather Pete find a way to keep String on the team and make him a model citizen, not run the kid with a big fat WDWHA.
I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
Ty wasn't 92-12
hth
Yet he lost to Ty
LIFPO because we really don't know what will happen. Losing players sucks, no way to put a positive spin on a shitty situation.
Hi this guy lost to Ty 38-0.
HTH
Exactly, so we all need to LIFPO.
I was just pointing out how Husky fans all dooged it up about how we needed to get the bad apples off the team during Ty's first year, and how this String conversation sounds familiar. I'd rather Pete find a way to keep String on the team and make him a model citizen, not run the kid with a big fat WDWHA.
We all want String to stay.
But at 92-12, with BCS wins ... Peterman has shown he knows how to build a team and can consistently win.
Not really caring or following ... but from what some TBS have relayed on the NAMBLA Bored ... it sounds like this kid has some maturity issues with the games he is playing with his Twits.
He could be a total fucking head case.
You don't know, until you do. Until then this is just April bullshit conversation.
Comments
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
hth
#ComportmentSuperiorityGuy
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Is this your brother posting now?
My second was after the Arizona blowout in 2012 "But how was that a bad game plan?"
Anyway, 4th degree assault ain't shit. Maybe plea down to disturbance knowing Hunsinger
Not going anywhere, no worries
LIFPO because we really don't know what will happen. Losing players sucks, no way to put a positive spin on a shitty situation.
HTH
What he lacks in learning the system he more than makes up for by actually having some game time experience which the other two don't have.
As for Stringfellow? I think some are reading too much into it. Petersen in an interview even said he doesn't believe in giving guys the boot. He never gave Titus Young the boot and in 2009 during their undefeated season they were top 10 in the nation in arrests.
I think String will be disciplined obviously but not booted. I don't see him playing at USC either. Remember if he chooses to transfer he has to get permission by us to go to another school. So if he goes to USC he'd have to go to a JC for a year then USC.
I think we should be in LIPO mode with regards to Stringfellow.
I was just pointing out how Husky fans all dooged it up about how we needed to get the bad apples off the team during Ty's first year, and how this String conversation sounds familiar. I'd rather Pete find a way to keep String on the team and make him a model citizen, not run the kid with a big fat WDWHA.
But at 92-12, with BCS wins ... Peterman has shown he knows how to build a team and can consistently win.
Not really caring or following ... but from what some TBS have relayed on the NAMBLA Bored ... it sounds like this kid has some maturity issues with the games he is playing with his Twits.
He could be a total fucking head case.
You don't know, until you do. Until then this is just April bullshit conversation.