Gosh, I would think the left would be mad about being duped
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
Comments
-
When you have zero pride it's easy to pretend like it didn't happen, even when you swallowed it all whole.
-
If you're a reporter and your source has lied to you, you no longer have any ethical obligation to keep the identity of your sources secret. Telling that none of these reporters have outted their sources. That tells me all I need to know. They were in on it. They were role players in the fraud.46XiJCAB said:When you have zero pride it's easy to pretend like it didn't happen, even when you swallowed it all whole.
-
Not if your sources are ex-spooks and they have dirt on you. Or political operatives that you're banging. MW, WM, MM, WW. Farm animals.SFGbob said:
If you're a reporter and your source has lied to you, you no longer have any ethical obligation to keep the identity of your sources secret. Telling that none of these reporters have outted their sources. That tells me all I need to know. They were in on it. They were role players in the fraud.46XiJCAB said:When you have zero pride it's easy to pretend like it didn't happen, even when you swallowed it all whole.
-
They only regret that the lie wasn't more effective.
-
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care. -
You know if you were going to allow this worthless piece of shit to return why didn't you demand that he at least come up with some new material?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
I read it Hondo, did you? Btw, this was the "report" written by the guy who knew before he even started investigating that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians to effect the election but still dragged it out for nearly two years in order to help the Rats. Keep sucking that dick Hondo, I can see that's still your only real talent.
-
Yes the campaign only expected it would benefit from the stolen and released information. The vast majority of the information released by the media was shown to be true. A fact you can't wrap your little mind around.SFGbob said:
You know if you were going to allow this worthless piece of shit to return why didn't you demand that he at least come up with some new material?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
I read it Hondo, did you? Btw, this was the "report" written by the guy who knew before he even started investigating that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians to effect the election but still dragged it out for nearly two years in order to help the Rats. Keep sucking that dick Hondo, I can see that's still your only real talent.
And here's what happens when you take quotes out of context.
While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”
To find conspiracy, a prosecutor must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the crime: an agreement between at least two people, to commit a criminal offense and an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.
Mueller found other contacts with Russia, such as the sharing of polling data about Midwestern states where Trump later won upset victories, conversations with the Russian ambassador to influence Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to election interference, and communications with Wikileaks after it had received emails stolen by Russia. While none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion.”
https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/ -
You mean the report Mueller testified in front of congress that he wasn't sure what was in it? That report?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care. -
You and I remember his testimony differently. Not that this is shocking news. But here's a refresher.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You mean the report Mueller testified in front of congress that he wasn't sure what was in it? That report?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.html -
Just so desperate to hang on to the lies, The NYT was completely invested in the lies. THey actually knew the dossier was fake and they still spent 2 years telling lies.2001400ex said:
You and I remember his testimony differently. Not that this is shocking news. But here's a refresher.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You mean the report Mueller testified in front of congress that he wasn't sure what was in it? That report?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.html
We all know that if Mueller had one scintilla of provable evidence he would have immediately prosecuted. That is why he was there, to overturn an election and take away half the country's vote.
Why don't you and old "Hands Up" HH go start your own website where you can ignore facts and reality while jerking each others pud. -
It's amazing how you speak like you are the enlightened intelligent one. Yet you don't even have a basic understanding of civics. You realize the due process for a sitting president is to go through the house for impeachment then the Senate for conviction, right?Bendintheriver said:
Just so desperate to hang on to the lies, The NYT was completely invested in the lies. THey actually knew the dossier was fake and they still spent 2 years telling lies.2001400ex said:
You and I remember his testimony differently. Not that this is shocking news. But here's a refresher.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You mean the report Mueller testified in front of congress that he wasn't sure what was in it? That report?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.html
We all know that if Mueller had one scintilla of provable evidence he would have immediately prosecuted. That is why he was there, to overturn an election and take away half the country's vote.
Why don't you and old "Hands Up" HH go start your own website where you can ignore facts and reality while jerking each others pud.
But yes HH and I are the ones who ignore facts and reality. I see the tug and clowns like you haven't changed. -
10?
All Trump all the time -
Well Trump was impeached, twice, and has zero convictions. So with my basic understanding of civics, he’s innocent. Yet you keep arguing that he’s not. He had his day in court and won.2001400ex said:
It's amazing how you speak like you are the enlightened intelligent one. Yet you don't even have a basic understanding of civics. You realize the due process for a sitting president is to go through the house for impeachment then the Senate for conviction, right?Bendintheriver said:
Just so desperate to hang on to the lies, The NYT was completely invested in the lies. THey actually knew the dossier was fake and they still spent 2 years telling lies.2001400ex said:
You and I remember his testimony differently. Not that this is shocking news. But here's a refresher.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You mean the report Mueller testified in front of congress that he wasn't sure what was in it? That report?2001400ex said:
I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.SFGbob said:It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.html
We all know that if Mueller had one scintilla of provable evidence he would have immediately prosecuted. That is why he was there, to overturn an election and take away half the country's vote.
Why don't you and old "Hands Up" HH go start your own website where you can ignore facts and reality while jerking each others pud.
But yes HH and I are the ones who ignore facts and reality. I see the tug and clowns like you haven't changed.
Fuck off.
-
Trump-1, Hondo-ZERO. The only score that matters. But the Mueller report said!
-
Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
-
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ... -
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge. -
Now that you have been educated on "civics" you pivot. LOL! Perry Mason you aren't.2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge. -
Biden is a piece of shit2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge.
A fact you won't acknowledge
Trump is gone now. NOC about the democrats bullshit -
I'm hearing that the left should focus on trump
-
Worked in VirginiaPitchfork51 said:I'm hearing that the left should focus on trump
-
Keep defending your Biden, Inslee, ANTIFA, votes. Did you do any looting? Just as dumb as I remember!2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge. -
Your boy started this thread about Trump and even mentioned Hillary. Can you read still old man?RaceBannon said:
Biden is a piece of shit2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge.
A fact you won't acknowledge
Trump is gone now. NOC about the democrats bullshit
And Biden is awful. You have a point? -
Where did I defend any of the people you just mentioned? You are still delusional. As always.Sledog said:
Keep defending your Biden, Inslee, ANTIFA, votes. Did you do any looting? Just as dumb as I remember!2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge. -
2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge.
The pertinent fact was what crime did Trump commit? I know you leftards and some Rinos like to ignore the written law but they wrote shit down for a reason. You suck at thus. -
Fuck off2001400ex said:
Your boy started this thread about Trump and even mentioned Hillary. Can you read still old man?RaceBannon said:
Biden is a piece of shit2001400ex said:
I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.Sledog said:Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge.
A fact you won't acknowledge
Trump is gone now. NOC about the democrats bullshit
And Biden is awful. You have a point?
All your posts are Trump -
And thats 9 posts
-
Are you happy you brought this worthless piece of shit back?
-
Mueller's entire intestigation was a political witch hunt. He knew that there was no collusion by the Trump campaign with the Russians before he even started the investigation. And he also knew that the Dossier was used to secure FISA warrants, that were then renewed during his time as SP. He knew that Hillary had paid for the Dossier. Yet he didn't reveal any of that information, in fact he did everything in his power to hide it.
If Mueller had the good on people why didn't he charge anyone? Why were all the prosecutions he pursued process crimes other than Manafort who's indictment had nothing to do with Trump or Russian collusion?
Why if his charge was to look at Russian interference in our election did Mueller intentionally never look at the actions of the DNC and Hillary? Whatever else Mueller may have said or not said in his report is worthless. The investigation was never an honest search for the facts and still he wasn't able to come up with anything that he could use to charge people with colluding with the Russians. -
Actually yes, I am. Watching him get bludgeoned in every thread makes me happy. It's the small things.SFGbob said:Are you happy you brought this worthless piece of shit back?
