Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options
Gosh, I would think the left would be mad about being duped
SFGbob
Member Posts: 31,922
in Tug Tavern
It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.
Comments
I read it Hondo, did you? Btw, this was the "report" written by the guy who knew before he even started investigating that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians to effect the election but still dragged it out for nearly two years in order to help the Rats. Keep sucking that dick Hondo, I can see that's still your only real talent.
And here's what happens when you take quotes out of context.
While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”
To find conspiracy, a prosecutor must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the crime: an agreement between at least two people, to commit a criminal offense and an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.
Mueller found other contacts with Russia, such as the sharing of polling data about Midwestern states where Trump later won upset victories, conversations with the Russian ambassador to influence Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to election interference, and communications with Wikileaks after it had received emails stolen by Russia. While none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion.”
https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.html
We all know that if Mueller had one scintilla of provable evidence he would have immediately prosecuted. That is why he was there, to overturn an election and take away half the country's vote.
Why don't you and old "Hands Up" HH go start your own website where you can ignore facts and reality while jerking each others pud.
But yes HH and I are the ones who ignore facts and reality. I see the tug and clowns like you haven't changed.
All Trump all the time
Fuck off.
==========
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...
Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.
Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.
All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge.
A fact you won't acknowledge
Trump is gone now. NOC about the democrats bullshit