Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
@Baseman
Comments
-
-
I want the Tulsa kid we've been talking about. He seems like all that but he hits.dnc said:
I'm fine with that assessment. He's the ability to tackle away from being all conference. That's obviously an important ability. I'll be thrilled if we have someone better for the position next year because that will be a pretty damn good player. But mostly think Turner get singled out too much. He's not the issue with the defense.AtomicDawg said:
Putting yourself in position to miss the tackle is a special quality. I don’t know who, but someone actually showed how he diagnosed plays pretty well vs Oregon only to whiff on tackles. But it’s not like anyone else better. It’s like the rest of the db’s are surprised by whatever route the wr’s are running every time (this is why i am not sold that it’s just a talent issue with the defense). If we were a real contender next year someone like that can’t start on your defense.dnc said:
He's a below average tackler but good at everything else - coverage, diagnosis, ball skills, etc.AtomicDawg said:
Turner is not good but he is the tallest midget.dnc said:
These actually aged pretty well. Turner was solid this year. We were a 100% better defense when he played.Jdawg1991 said:backthepack said:
He sucks. I stopped defending him last year. He’s a nightmare in coverage.RoadDawg55 said:BTP is right in this case. Kirkland is not good. That said, he was defending Asa Turner til the end.
Receipts
I'm very glad he didn't portal out. -
Strongly disagree on coverage. Maybe it's scheme where he's put in unwinnable situations, but he takes a lot of bad angles and seems to get burned a lot.dnc said:
He's a below average tackler but good at everything else - coverage, diagnosis, ball skills, etc.AtomicDawg said:
Turner is not good but he is the tallest midget.dnc said:
These actually aged pretty well. Turner was solid this year. We were a 100% better defense when he played.Jdawg1991 said:backthepack said:
He sucks. I stopped defending him last year. He’s a nightmare in coverage.RoadDawg55 said:BTP is right in this case. Kirkland is not good. That said, he was defending Asa Turner til the end.
Receipts -
I haven't seen that. Curious if he's bad in coverage and a bad tackler why the defense plays better with him in there? You think it's just coincidental?Sources said:
Strongly disagree on coverage. Maybe it's scheme where he's put in unwinnable situations, but he takes a lot of bad angles and seems to get burned a lot.dnc said:
He's a below average tackler but good at everything else - coverage, diagnosis, ball skills, etc.AtomicDawg said:
Turner is not good but he is the tallest midget.dnc said:
These actually aged pretty well. Turner was solid this year. We were a 100% better defense when he played.Jdawg1991 said:backthepack said:
He sucks. I stopped defending him last year. He’s a nightmare in coverage.RoadDawg55 said:BTP is right in this case. Kirkland is not good. That said, he was defending Asa Turner til the end.
Receipts -
Take it to the drag board!RaceBannon said: -
Lol. 3 time 1st team All-Pac lineman who played last year on a dislocated/fractured ankle.backthepack said:
Undeserved, we had 4 better offensive lineman that should have made all conf 1st team over him. He's a solid college player, nothing spectacular, light in the pants couldnt anchor at tackle. We saw Aiden Hutchinson absolutely abuse that. Won't even sniff a starting opportunity in the NFL unless he comes in via injury.Baseman said:backthepack said:He's so good he got moved to a guard as a 6th year senior.
A better meme doesn’t exist
