Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
What do you drive them on?
You think I want zero government you dumbfuck?
Stimulating discourse from a leftard like the slobberer consists of one or all of the following:
Play the race/bigot card Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument Use an ad hominem attack Phuck some strawman ass Completely avoid the topic (ask a leftard to define black for AA purposes or explain how a cloth mask filters out a virus particle - crickets) Lie
Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
What do you drive them on?
You think I want zero government you dumbfuck?
Stimulating discourse from a leftard like the slobberer consists of one or all of the following:
Play the race/bigot card Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument Use an ad hominem attack Phuck some strawman ass Completely avoid the topic (ask a leftard to define black for AA purposes or explain how a cloth mask filters out a virus particle - crickets) Lie
Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
Some commie paradises like Cuba have lots of classic Chevy's. Nothing says "thriving economy" like being stuck in the 1950s.
Don't forget that one of the founders of the 1619 Projekt said that Cuba is the 'most equal' country in the western hemisphere.
Equal despair. Equal misery. Equal sheets of TP. Equal loaves of bread. Equal shitty health care. Equal violation of human rights. Sounds like a socialist utopia, where do I sign up, Kobe?
Some commie paradises like Cuba have lots of classic Chevy's. Nothing says "thriving economy" like being stuck in the 1950s.
Don't forget that one of the founders of the 1619 Projekt said that Cuba is the 'most equal' country in the western hemisphere.
Equal despair. Equal misery. Equal sheets of TP. Equal loaves of bread. Equal shitty health care. Equal violation of human rights. Sounds like a socialist utopia, where do I sign up, Kobe?
Current regime is NAZI. They've turned the government and all its power on anyone opposing them along with their partners in media, big tech and big industry all in lock step oppressing all dissent, speech and even basic necessities all while attacking them physically with their brown shirts IE: ANTIFA and BLM.
Fuck off Nazi boy toy!
I am amazed at how many leftists I hear calling to let the un-vaccinated die without any healthcare. They are saying this shit in public!
The lack of humanity on the left for those that disagree with them politically is astounding and begs the comparison to some of the heartless regimes in history.
Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
Comments
Play the race/bigot card
Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument
Use an ad hominem attack
Phuck some strawman ass
Completely avoid the topic (ask a leftard to define black for AA purposes or explain how a cloth mask filters out a virus particle - crickets)
Lie
Needs more brontosaurus ribs.