Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fascism is a right wing ideology
Comments
-
We should give more money and more power to the state it sounds like.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic. -
Capitalism worked and it has been a giant leap forward for civilization. That doesn’t make any of what I said less true.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's cute that you think this. The history of the West vs. The Soviet block(or any other Marxist system) is pretty telling as to which system allows for the common idiot to accumulate capital.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Socialism and communism, whether true or in name only, has failed. That doesn’t make a single word of what I just said less true. -
I would prefer a billionaire who made his money in private over a piece of shit who got rich selling his office for 47 years
And I don't apologize for it
The rest of your screed is nonsense -
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic. -
So you are conceding that fascism is a left wing ideology.TheKobeStopper said:
Capitalism worked and it has been a giant leap forward for civilization. That doesn’t make any of what I said less true.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's cute that you think this. The history of the West vs. The Soviet block(or any other Marxist system) is pretty telling as to which system allows for the common idiot to accumulate capital.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Socialism and communism, whether true or in name only, has failed. That doesn’t make a single word of what I just said less true.
Glad we could clear that up. -
This is preferable than more money and more power to the capitalists who are showing you, right now, they’ll just use it to control the state.Bob_C said:
We should give more money and more power to the state it sounds like.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
We have a democracy, that gives the people power. The state doesn’t run independently. But you won’t vote for the people trying to prevent the capitalists from controlling our government. Because, SOMEHOW, both are communism.
The state and capital merging, that’s a communism.
AOC and Bernie trying to prevent it, that’s a communism.
It’s bizarre. -
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure. -
So what you are telling us is that you are super ignorant of any kind of finance and economics.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
I mean, we already knew that but it's nice for you to admit it so earnestly. -
Putin, Xi, Castro and Chavez are/were billionaires. Value added like Steve Jobs? Phuck off you uneducated moron.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure. -
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
