Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fascism is a right wing ideology

UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,179 Swaye's Wigwam
in Tug Tavern
Except that it's spawned directly from Marxism and socialism and is only "right" from communism.

https://youtu.be/l3FiBPxGxyk

Tldw that guy Mussolini had some stuff to say about it.

@TheKobeStopper will continue to lie and not address this thread. There's a reason Leftists are obsessed with labeling everyone else fascists.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,185 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2021
    Jeezus. Please tell me you aren't a result of public education.

    Mein Kampf is your bible. It is exactly what you progressives want. Everyone thinking, acting, saying and believing exactly what you want them to do. In the meantime, your government controls all and rewards only those that believe what it does.

    You suck. If you were to see me face to face and try to force me to do what fascists like you want me to do I would kick your ever loving ass from here to China.

    The shit you and your non-gender snowflakes preach is worthy of a beat down. It is time for Americans to fight back.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Bendintheriver said:

    Jeezus. Please tell me you aren't a result of public education.

    Mein Kampf is your bible. It is exactly what you progressives want. Everyone thinking, acting, saying and believing exactly what you want them to do. In the meantime, your government controls all and rewards only those that believe what it does.

    You suck. If you were to see me face to face and try to force me to do what fascists like you want me to do I would kick your ever loving ass from here to China.

    The shit you and your non-gender snowflakes preach is worthy of a beat down. It is time for Americans to fight back.

    Which 7-11 should we meet at?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,923 Swaye's Wigwam
    TheKobeStopper said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Jeezus. Please tell me you aren't a result of public education.

    Mein Kampf is your bible. It is exactly what you progressives want. Everyone thinking, acting, saying and believing exactly what you want them to do. In the meantime, your government controls all and rewards only those that believe what it does.

    You suck. If you were to see me face to face and try to force me to do what fascists like you want me to do I would kick your ever loving ass from here to China.

    The shit you and your non-gender snowflakes preach is worthy of a beat down. It is time for Americans to fight back.

    Which 7-11 should we meet at?
    Vantage
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    It's cute that you think this. The history of the West vs. The Soviet block(or any other Marxist system) is pretty telling as to which system allows for the common idiot to accumulate capital.
    Capitalism worked and it has been a giant leap forward for civilization. That doesn’t make any of what I said less true.

    Socialism and communism, whether true or in name only, has failed. That doesn’t make a single word of what I just said less true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,520
    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Bob_C said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    We should give more money and more power to the state it sounds like.
    This is preferable than more money and more power to the capitalists who are showing you, right now, they’ll just use it to control the state.

    We have a democracy, that gives the people power. The state doesn’t run independently. But you won’t vote for the people trying to prevent the capitalists from controlling our government. Because, SOMEHOW, both are communism.

    The state and capital merging, that’s a communism.

    AOC and Bernie trying to prevent it, that’s a communism.

    It’s bizarre.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,710 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Putin, Xi, Castro and Chavez are/were billionaires. Value added like Steve Jobs? Phuck off you uneducated moron.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.