Who takes over for Keith Price?
Comments
-
CheersWestDawg said:
Loves Lambo. Thinks Sark will be the tits at SC. Says Price is dead weight.
Doogs gonna Doog.Swaye said:If Hugh Millen read this thread, his
headhair plugs would explode. -
Who takes over for Keith Price?... if you had been reading JooBlog daily, you would already know.
-
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Sark. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge. -
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge. -
because Sark was too "loyal" to price. That's what doogs clalked it up to, so FSTierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge. -
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
-
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the way of your agenda. -
Why didn't Price play over Locker in 2010? Why didn't Manziel play over Tannehill? What about Winston over Manuel? Nice argument Boobie. Price was always going to be the starter.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the way of your agenda.
-
Agree. Price has a better completion, rating, YPA as well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the
way of your agenda.
Price was the better option. Road Dawg always conviently leaves out how Price out played everyone else in the conference against Stanford.
Also Price had 21 TD's and only 6 int's while completing 66.7% of his passes. Thinking we can just replicate that is FS.
I remember fans just like yourself saying we'd have no problem replacing Pickett. Paus was better against Oregon, Stanback is more athletic and Bonnell was a highly rated recruit too blah blah blah,
-
Miles had 200 rushing yards rushing and averaged 8.7 per carry. Price had 108 and averaged 1.3. They bring different things. Honestly, even comparing their stats is FS. Miles had less than 2 games of full playing time. Here, I will supply you the stats from 2010. Locker was better than Price in every category. Really fucking bad arguments from you guys. I'll bet you Sven's $20 that the next QB will be better than 7th in the conference in total QBR.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree. Price has a better completion, rating, YPA as well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the
way of your agenda.
Price was the better option. Road Dawg always conviently leaves out how Price out played everyone else in the conference against Stanford.
Also Price had 21 TD's and only 6 int's while completing 66.7% of his passes. Thinking we can just replicate that is FS.
I remember fans just like yourself saying we'd have no problem replacing Pickett. Paus was better against Oregon, Stanback is more athletic and Bonnell was a highly rated recruit too blah blah blah,
The goal isn't to have the QB that plays best against Stanford. That's like Doogs saying beating Oregon is all that matters. It's to have a QB that is consistently good.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264/year/2010/washington-huskies
-
I expect the QB situation to be fine BC I trust Petersen.
I will enjoy a QB who can run that will be fun. However, don't take Price accuracy and lack of turnovers for granted either.
If Miles receives the boot color me worried about the QB situation. -
Fair enough. I would feel better if Miles was available and wasn't probably going to be suspended for a few games. We both agree that the real difference will be Petersen. Price would have done better with a better head coach and a defense that wasn't historically bad in 2011.He_Needs_More_Time said:I expect the QB situation to be fine BC I trust Petersen.
I will enjoy a QB who can run that will be fun. However, don't take Price accuracy and lack of turnovers for granted either.
If Miles receives the boot color me worried about the QB situation.
-
Price WAS a very good quarterback who was underrated his last season.
He won't be that hard to replace because the new QB will provide the running threat that Price lacked.
Abundance, mother fuckers. -
simple fact, case closed, end of discussionHeretoBeatmyChest said:Price WAS a very good quarterback who was underrated his last season.
He won't be that hard to replace because the new QB will provide the running threat that Price lacked.
Abundance, mother fuckers.
-
That link made my whole point.RoadDawg55 said:
Miles had 200 rushing yards rushing and averaged 8.7 per carry. Price had 108 and averaged 1.3. They bring different things. Honestly, even comparing their stats is FS. Miles had less than 2 games of full playing time. Here, I will supply you the stats from 2010. Locker was better than Price in every category. Really fucking bad arguments from you guys. I'll bet you Sven's $20 that the next QB will be better than 7th in the conference in total QBR.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree. Price has a better completion, rating, YPA as well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the
way of your agenda.
Price was the better option. Road Dawg always conviently leaves out how Price out played everyone else in the conference against Stanford.
Also Price had 21 TD's and only 6 int's while completing 66.7% of his passes. Thinking we can just replicate that is FS.
I remember fans just like yourself saying we'd have no problem replacing Pickett. Paus was better against Oregon, Stanback is more athletic and Bonnell was a highly rated recruit too blah blah blah,
The goal isn't to have the QB that plays best against Stanford. That's like Doogs saying beating Oregon is all that matters. It's to have a QB that is consistently good.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264/year/2010/washington-huskies
Price was better than Lockner, so he should have been playing.
-
Stephanie Sarkisian agrees that Sark is a loyal man.dhdawg said:
because Sark was too "loyal" to price. That's what doogs clalked it up to, so FSTierbsHsotBoobs said:RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
If Price was so average, why wasn't he
replaced last year? -
Price might have been better, but the stats don't show that to be true.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That link made my whole point.RoadDawg55 said:
Miles had 200 rushing yards rushing and averaged 8.7 per carry. Price had 108 and averaged 1.3. They bring different things. Honestly, even comparing their stats is FS. Miles had less than 2 games of full playing time. Here, I will supply you the stats from 2010. Locker was better than Price in every category. Really fucking bad arguments from you guys. I'll bet you Sven's $20 that the next QB will be better than 7th in the conference in total QBR.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree. Price has a better completion, rating, YPA as well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the
way of your agenda.
Price was the better option. Road Dawg always conviently leaves out how Price out played everyone else in the conference against Stanford.
Also Price had 21 TD's and only 6 int's while completing 66.7% of his passes. Thinking we can just replicate that is FS.
I remember fans just like yourself saying we'd have no problem replacing Pickett. Paus was better against Oregon, Stanback is more athletic and Bonnell was a highly rated recruit too blah blah blah,
The goal isn't to have the QB that plays best against Stanford. That's like Doogs saying beating Oregon is all that matters. It's to have a QB that is consistently good.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264/year/2010/washington-huskies
Price was better than Lockner, so he should have been playing.
-
Kiel Rasp should have been the starter. Stats don't lie...........RoadDawg55 said:
Price might have been better, but the stats don't show that to be true.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That link made my whole point.RoadDawg55 said:
Miles had 200 rushing yards rushing and averaged 8.7 per carry. Price had 108 and averaged 1.3. They bring different things. Honestly, even comparing their stats is FS. Miles had less than 2 games of full playing time. Here, I will supply you the stats from 2010. Locker was better than Price in every category. Really fucking bad arguments from you guys. I'll bet you Sven's $20 that the next QB will be better than 7th in the conference in total QBR.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree. Price has a better completion, rating, YPA as well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why didn't Sark play Miles every game?RoadDawg55 said:
When wasn't he replaced? We played fine without him. We would have had the same record if Miles started every game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If Price was so average, why wasn't he replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
I agree. I think we are bound to be better strictly because of having Petersen instead of Price. That said, it's FS to pretend like a guy who will go undrafted and never made an All Conference team is going to be really hard to replace.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Price outplayed Miles last year, but don't let facts get in the
way of your agenda.
Price was the better option. Road Dawg always conviently leaves out how Price out played everyone else in the conference against Stanford.
Also Price had 21 TD's and only 6 int's while completing 66.7% of his passes. Thinking we can just replicate that is FS.
I remember fans just like yourself saying we'd have no problem replacing Pickett. Paus was better against Oregon, Stanback is more athletic and Bonnell was a highly rated recruit too blah blah blah,
The goal isn't to have the QB that plays best against Stanford. That's like Doogs saying beating Oregon is all that matters. It's to have a QB that is consistently good.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264/year/2010/washington-huskies
Price was better than Lockner, so he should have been playing. -
so, which USC qb is Loyal Sark going to mess up? Good luck with your qb this year. You are going to be more efficient all around.
-
Kellen Moore senior yr 20 rushes for -66 yds -3.3 avg pretty fucking good career W/L record.
Trust in Peterman.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/kellen-moore-1.html -
Darron Thomas.
-
I appreciate what Price did and he was very good at times but one of the doogs at uwdoogpoond said he was a "legendary quarterback."
-
Two kinds of QB's at UW. Those who win Rose Bowls and those who are forgotten.........haie said:I appreciate what Price did and he was very good at times but one of the doogs at uwdoogpoond said he was a "legendary quarterback."
-
Mild whoosh, dipshit.allpurpleallgold said:
*you'reCaptainPJ said:
3-2-1. . . Your a ray-siss!!!RoadDawg55 said:
Price was a solid QB, but he's not Andrew Luck. He's probably going undrafted. He can easily be replaced.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You have to be PL_SSFS to think UW can easily replace the best quarterback it has had in a decade.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anybody that takes over for Price is an immediate improvement. Same can be said for Sark. Now if we can replace more_time, an instant improvement to the bored will occur as well. Good things happen in 3's.
You knew to this bored? -
His haircut definitely stood out. If he made it to the NFL he should be able to afford a decent barber.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
