Lol..just 9 short years ago....
Comments
-
Dickheads.gonna.dickhead. I'm not the type to go to some pep rally and go nuts because of a #1 seed. I'm sure many of those fans are the ones that think we should keep Romar forever. They probably liked Sark too and had no problem with rushing the field when we beat Stanford in the GameDay championship I just don't have a problem with celebrating wins and accomplishments as they come. You also said some of us were hooking it up when it was obvious all fucking season how good the Seahawks were.MikeDamone said:
Doogs.gonna.doogRoadDawg55 said:dnc said:
I'm with you on this, but that team didn't win the Pac10 championship.RoadDawg55 said:
You're right. Winning the Pac 10 championship and earning a #1 seed sucks. Your logic is fucking stupid. So Florida State is the only team to celebrate this year in football because they won the title? In 2000, we shouldn't have celebrated a Rose Bowl win because we didn't win the National Championship?MikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
Tournament. -
Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
-
You seem offended. Let me guess, you were one of the goofs in the video creaming your pants over the almost accomplishment.RoadDawg55 said:
Dickheads.gonna.dickhead. I'm not the type to go to some pep rally and go nuts because of a #1 seed. I'm sure many of those fans are the ones that think we should keep Romar forever. They probably liked Sark too and had no problem with rushing the field when we beat Stanford in the GameDay championship I just don't have a problem with celebrating wins and accomplishments as they come. You also said some of us were hooking it up when it was obvious all fucking season how good the Seahawks were.MikeDamone said:
Doogs.gonna.doogRoadDawg55 said:dnc said:
I'm with you on this, but that team didn't win the Pac10 championship.RoadDawg55 said:
You're right. Winning the Pac 10 championship and earning a #1 seed sucks. Your logic is fucking stupid. So Florida State is the only team to celebrate this year in football because they won the title? In 2000, we shouldn't have celebrated a Rose Bowl win because we didn't win the National Championship?MikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
Tournament.
-
You would piss yourself to have my life..let alone Harvs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
-
DAMONE IS THE KING OF SW WASHINGTON, BEEEOOOOTCH
-
Massive difference IMO.RoadDawg55 said:dnc said:
I'm with you on this, but that team didn't win the Pac10 championship.RoadDawg55 said:
You're right. Winning the Pac 10 championship and earning a #1 seed sucks. Your logic is fucking stupid. So Florida State is the only team to celebrate this year in football because they won the title? In 2000, we shouldn't have celebrated a Rose Bowl win because we didn't win the National Championship?MikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
Tournament.
I didn't have a problem with them celebrating the 1 seed. It wasn't that anyone thought it was an accomplishment, it was just an absolute shock. Nobody but Reece and NelsonDudley thought that team was getting a 1 seed.
I celebrated Sark leaving and Petersen coming. Not because either one was an accomplishment on their own, but because both shocked the hell out of me.
-
That Louisville team as a 4 seed was severely underrated. Also Romar vs Patino is a bitch slapping waiting to happen.
-
No idea how L'ville was a 4 seed that yr... L'ville was favored that game as well
-
There is a difference, but in my mind, they basically won the championship. The Pac 10 championship was #1 Arizona (15-3) and #2 UW (14-4). UW won the game and 2 outta 3 against Arizona. If we won the conference tournament after being 10-8 in conference, I would think of it much differently.dnc said:
Massive difference IMO.RoadDawg55 said:dnc said:
I'm with you on this, but that team didn't win the Pac10 championship.RoadDawg55 said:
You're right. Winning the Pac 10 championship and earning a #1 seed sucks. Your logic is fucking stupid. So Florida State is the only team to celebrate this year in football because they won the title? In 2000, we shouldn't have celebrated a Rose Bowl win because we didn't win the National Championship?MikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
Tournament.
I didn't have a problem with them celebrating the 1 seed. It wasn't that anyone thought it was an accomplishment, it was just an absolute shock. Nobody but Reece and NelsonDudley thought that team was getting a 1 seed.
I celebrated Sark leaving and Petersen coming. Not because either one was an accomplishment on their own, but because both shocked the hell out of me.
The #1 seed was verification of national respect for a very good regular season. The loss to Louisville sucked and we got outplayed and outcoached. The sports programs at UW and Pro Sports teams would suck if everyone was like Damone and only celebrated after a title. I am all for not spending money and supporting shitty teams, not making excuses for shitty coaches, and being honest about a teams performance. Those are the fans that are problems, not the ones that celebrate #1 seeds. -
Sounds like it was a magical season.RoadDawg55 said:
There is a difference, but in my mind, they basically won the championship. The Pac 10 championship was #1 Arizona (15-3) and #2 UW (14-4). UW won the game and 2 outta 3 against Arizona. If we won the conference tournament after being 10-8 in conference, I would think of it much differently.dnc said:
Massive difference IMO.RoadDawg55 said:dnc said:
I'm with you on this, but that team didn't win the Pac10 championship.RoadDawg55 said:
You're right. Winning the Pac 10 championship and earning a #1 seed sucks. Your logic is fucking stupid. So Florida State is the only team to celebrate this year in football because they won the title? In 2000, we shouldn't have celebrated a Rose Bowl win because we didn't win the National Championship?MikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
Tournament.
I didn't have a problem with them celebrating the 1 seed. It wasn't that anyone thought it was an accomplishment, it was just an absolute shock. Nobody but Reece and NelsonDudley thought that team was getting a 1 seed.
I celebrated Sark leaving and Petersen coming. Not because either one was an accomplishment on their own, but because both shocked the hell out of me.
The #1 seed was verification of national respect for a very good regular season. The loss to Louisville sucked and we got outplayed and outcoached. The sports programs at UW and Pro Sports teams would suck if everyone was like Damone and only celebrated after a title. I am all for not spending money and supporting shitty teams, not making excuses for shitty coaches, and being honest about a teams performance. Those are the fans that are problems, not the ones that celebrate #1 seeds.






