"Around-the-block" Coordinator Hires...lol
Comments
-
Around the block coordinators >>> around the way girls.
-
Yes, just not on the Wilcox-Holt part. There was definitely a difference.RaceBannon said:
I expect Texas and Sark to still give up 50 to Oklahoma even with Kwat even with Herman playerschuck said:I think the overarching point is correct. It always comes back to the head coach.
You can tell good assistants from really bad ones in most cases though. Wilcox is a good defensive coach. It wasn't hard to see the immediate improvement over Holt.
My guess is that Petersen would have had similarly good defenses at UW with Wilcox as DC as he had with Kawasaki. There's a hell of a lot more to it than scheme. The HC is responsible for the culture, work ethic and all that other gay stuff but he's also ultimately responsible for the personnel. Petersen was a good roster builder. Sark was not.
Sounds like I agree with you
Kwat made a pretty dumb move on the surface if one assumes that he's working on his resume. His defense will struggle with Sark as the HC. It doesn't seem to matter though. He can always fail upward like his new boss keeps doing. -
I'm not willing to die on the Wilcocks hill I just like calling him Wilcocks and don't want him here if/when Jimmy fails
@dnc is riii righ right but still -
I dont want Wilcox back at UW as head coach either. He would be a better hire than Sark was, but that's faint praise.RaceBannon said:I'm not willing to die on the Wilcocks hill I just like calling him Wilcocks and don't want him here if/when Jimmy fails
@dnc is riii righ right but still -
I supper superior cultureRaceBannon said:I'm not willing to die on the Wilcocks hill I just like calling him Wilcocks and don't want him here if/when Jimmy fails
@dnc is riii righ right but still -
That's why I don't want himdnc said:
I supper superior cultureRaceBannon said:I'm not willing to die on the Wilcocks hill I just like calling him Wilcocks and don't want him here if/when Jimmy fails
@dnc is riii righ right but still
Even with superior culture his record is meh
Reminds me of "Gilby didn't have the support he needed at Cal but he will do great at UW!"
@BearsWiin -
I wouldn't really want him. I do think he'd be an improvement over Jimmy and one of the few ones you can realistically imagine Jen pursuing.RaceBannon said:
That's why I don't want himdnc said:
I supper superior cultureRaceBannon said:I'm not willing to die on the Wilcocks hill I just like calling him Wilcocks and don't want him here if/when Jimmy fails
@dnc is riii righ right but still
Even with superior culture his record is meh
Reminds me of "Gilby didn't have the support he needed at Cal but he will do great at UW!"
@BearsWiin
I don't think he'd be the next great Husky coach though.
TPIO -
Upvote but don't think he'd be an improvement
Let's circle back this November -
-
I concede it was a stretch for the sake of my argument. The Carroll/Sark offenses were boring and worked like Novocain as they slowly overwhelmed you with superior athletes. The Chow years were much more dynamic or as dynamic as Carroll would allow an offense to be anyway.dnc said:
I don't think Sark was a great OC for Carroll. It was a big reason I wasn't a big fan of the hire.theknowledge said:Sark was a great OC for Carrol and Saban, he was an average to below average OC at UW and with the Atlanta Falcons. Wilcox was a great DC (top ten defenses) under Peterman and Chryst and good(UW)/average(USC) DC under Sark and Derek Dooley at UT. I fully expect that the bend but don’t break, twelve play drive, hold em to a FG defense of Kwat will be a poor match with the all gas no breaks offense of Sark. Unless Kwat runs a defense completely different from what he ran at Bose/UW or Sark runs an offense completely different from what got him his job at Texas the two styles can’t mesh. Ive got my popcorn ready though.
CantwaitGIF
