"Around-the-block" Coordinator Hires...lol
Comments
-
That's really not nice you knowDerekJohnson said:
You know the general point I'm making. Obi-wan HHusky has taught you wellRaceBannon said:I'll take a 1-1 record in the national championship game
Gloves could come off over a comment like that -
paging @creepycokerRaceBannon said:
-
My first thought: those are fighting words.RaceBannon said:
That's really not nice you knowDerekJohnson said:
You know the general point I'm making. Obi-wan HHusky has taught you wellRaceBannon said:I'll take a 1-1 record in the national championship game
Gloves could come off over a comment like that
So far DJ lives to fight another day.
-
This always sounds good but it's mostly bullshit.RaceBannon said:Coordinators are on the head coach. The better the head man the better the coordinator.
Justin Wilcocks was not better than Nick Holt because Sark was still the coach
Quite honestly I have no idea if Jimmy has a thin rolodex or no one wants to work for him or if he thought Donavon and Gregory were the guys. In just over a week we begin to find out. If UW wins coaches will be calling Jimmy and his rolodex will fatten
I don't buy the coach speak from the guy who took more money to go to Texas as the damning indictment that many here do. As always I could be wrong. But probably not
Wilcox was a massive upgrade from Holt. UW gave up 35.9 points a game in 2011 under Holt. We? gave up 24.2 points a game the next season under Wilcox. (and 22.8 the year after that).
All with the same head coach.
Sark's mediocrity put a ceiling on how good Wilcox could be but it didn't put a floor on how bad Holt could be. -
Arizona hung 50 on him
So did Oregon in a 7-6 campaign with a loss to coog
-
Yep, he wasn't perfect.RaceBannon said:Arizona hung 50 on him
So did Oregon in a 7-6 campaign with a loss to coog
He was a huge upgrade though.
Biggest reason 7 win Sark had a team win 9.
That wasn't happening with Holt. -
I think the overarching point is correct. It always comes back to the head coach.
You can tell good assistants from really bad ones in most cases though. Wilcox is a good defensive coach. It wasn't hard to see the immediate improvement over Holt.
My guess is that Petersen would have had similarly good defenses at UW with Wilcox as DC as he had with Kawasaki. There's a hell of a lot more to it than scheme. The HC is responsible for the culture, work ethic and all that other gay stuff but he's also ultimately responsible for the personnel. Petersen was a good roster builder. Sark was not. -
The better the coordinator hires, the better the head coach will appear to be (W-L’s).RaceBannon said:Coordinators are on the head coach. The better the head man the better the coordinator.
Justin Wilcocks was not better than Nick Holt because Sark was still the coach
Quite honestly I have no idea if Jimmy has a thin rolodex or no one wants to work for him or if he thought Donavon and Gregory were the guys. In just over a week we begin to find out. If UW wins coaches will be calling Jimmy and his rolodex will fatten
I don't buy the coach speak from the guy who took more money to go to Texas as the damning indictment that many here do. As always I could be wrong. But probably not
Remember, coordinators are usually sacrificed before the Big Guy is canned. See Nick Holt.
IMHO -
8 wins. Tui got win number 9.dnc said:
Yep, he wasn't perfect.RaceBannon said:Arizona hung 50 on him
So did Oregon in a 7-6 campaign with a loss to coog
He was a huge upgrade though.
Biggest reason 7 win Sark had a team win 9.
That wasn't happening with Holt. -
I expect Texas and Sark to still give up 50 to Oklahoma even with Kwat even with Herman playerschuck said:I think the overarching point is correct. It always comes back to the head coach.
You can tell good assistants from really bad ones in most cases though. Wilcox is a good defensive coach. It wasn't hard to see the immediate improvement over Holt.
My guess is that Petersen would have had similarly good defenses at UW with Wilcox as DC as he had with Kawasaki. There's a hell of a lot more to it than scheme. The HC is responsible for the culture, work ethic and all that other gay stuff but he's also ultimately responsible for the personnel. Petersen was a good roster builder. Sark was not.
Sounds like I agree with you






