OK Athletics Directors
OK Athletics Directors 35 votes
11 votes
24 votes
Comments
-
NoNo, for 2 reasons:
1) He's still won the Pac .333% of the time, so meeting Don James metric.
2) The replacement is more likely to be a downgrade.
See what 2020 looks like and reassess. -
YesYes, I checked out on him the final two years. Did not have the killer instinct needed, played guys based on seniority over talent in several instances which cost them games, and you could see he was burned out. The legacy of Pete is highlighted by some funny gifs. Playoff loss to Bama was a fun year.
-
YesFrom afar I could tell he was burned out, (and I took some ridicule here for saying so). So if I was the AD I would have absolutely seen it, and I probably would have known it was time to move on while we still had momentum.
-
-
No
Not to mention 3 years prior were 3 NY6 games including trip to CFPYellowSnow said:No, for 2 reasons:
1) He's still won the Pac .333% of the time, so meeting Don James metric.
2) The replacement is more likely to be a downgrade.
See what 2020 looks like and reassess.
Your point 2 is spot on -
No
Agree that the burnout was evident and definitely a discussion pointDerekJohnson said:From afar I could tell he was burned out, (and I took some ridicule here for saying so). So if I was the AD I would have absolutely seen it, and I probably would have known it was time to move on while we still had momentum.
Discussion point doesn’t = firing though -
YesFound the fraud
-
Yes
Lost all of them. Downward trajectory his final two seasons. Do you wait until the ship has taken on so much water that it takes 5 years to bail out? Of course, we know that Jenn would never have fired Petersen unless he had 2-3 years of .500 or worse. They're all too chummy in the AD.Tequilla said:
Not to mention 3 years prior were 3 NY6 games including trip to CFPYellowSnow said:No, for 2 reasons:
1) He's still won the Pac .333% of the time, so meeting Don James metric.
2) The replacement is more likely to be a downgrade.
See what 2020 looks like and reassess.
Your point 2 is spot on -
Yes
That's the argument Teq uses to fire Jimmy after 4 gamesBleachedAnusDawg said:
Lost all of them. Downward trajectory his final two seasons. Do you wait until the ship has taken on so much water that it takes 5 years to bail out? Of course, we know that Jenn would never have fired Petersen unless he had 2-3 years of .500 or worse. They're all too chummy in the AD.Tequilla said:
Not to mention 3 years prior were 3 NY6 games including trip to CFPYellowSnow said:No, for 2 reasons:
1) He's still won the Pac .333% of the time, so meeting Don James metric.
2) The replacement is more likely to be a downgrade.
See what 2020 looks like and reassess.
Your point 2 is spot on
-
Yes
Clearly Teq is racist.RaceBannon said:
That's the argument Teq uses to fire Jimmy after 4 gamesBleachedAnusDawg said:
Lost all of them. Downward trajectory his final two seasons. Do you wait until the ship has taken on so much water that it takes 5 years to bail out? Of course, we know that Jenn would never have fired Petersen unless he had 2-3 years of .500 or worse. They're all too chummy in the AD.Tequilla said:
Not to mention 3 years prior were 3 NY6 games including trip to CFPYellowSnow said:No, for 2 reasons:
1) He's still won the Pac .333% of the time, so meeting Don James metric.
2) The replacement is more likely to be a downgrade.
See what 2020 looks like and reassess.
Your point 2 is spot on
