Gender theory infecting medical schools
Comments
-
Mean Abigail Shrier. Liar Abigail Shrier. Hide your eyes and cover your ears!trublue said:Shrier’s book raises a lot of good questions that should be openly and rationally discussed, e.g., why is there a surge in gender dysphoria for teenage women wanting to become men? This was virtually non-existent pre-internet and as recently as 20 years ago.
New Diagnosis: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. -
TKS: Paragraph 3 is a bald-faced lie.
Sentences 1, 2 and 3.
There were many parents interviewed. Most were progressive and accepting of their children’s transgender identities.
Making the transition and letting children make decisions of this magnitude did not prove to be a panacea for those involved, particularly the adolescents who made these life-altering decisions. -
He’s not open to diversity of thought. He thinks people who don’t think like him are evil. And should be removed from society.trublue said:
TKS: Have you read Shrier’s book?TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/202012/new-book-irreversible-damage-is-full-misinformation?ampjecornel said:Keep educating yourself.
Shrier did not interview most of the transgender adolescents she wrote about.
Shrier's book tells the stories of several young people who came out as transgender to their parents. The book claims that these adolescents and young adults were not actually transgender, but actually just confused. The problem is Shrier didn't actually interview any of these people she wrote about.
The author’s note points out that she only interviewed their parents, who uniformly did not accept their children’s transgender identities. Many of them were estranged from their kids because the children were so hurt by their parents' rejection. To actually understand the psychology of these young people, one would need to talk to them, not simply rely on stories from parents with whom they do not speak.
To make things worse, the author's note explains that Shrier changed details in the book to ensure the transgender people she wrote about would not be able to recognize themselves. In doing so, she ensured they could not provide their side of the story or point out any inaccuracies in her reporting.
Helluva book you got there.
If not, STFU, and don’t link someone else’s opinion because it fits the narrative you want to believe.
I read the book. I didn’t get the takeaways that your link did.
Have an open mind. -
BUMP TO KOBEtrublue said:TKS: Paragraph 3 is a bald-faced lie.
Sentences 1, 2 and 3.
There were many parents interviewed. Most were progressive and accepting of their children’s transgender identities.
Making the transition and letting children make decisions of this magnitude did not prove to be a panacea for those involved, particularly the adolescents who made these life-altering decisions. -
I'll go out on a limb and say Kobeslobber's daddy was a deadbeat or dope.
-
Which one?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I'll go out on a limb and say Kobeslobber's daddy was a deadbeat or dope.
-
That would require thought, which is way, way beyond @TheKobeStopper's reach.trublue said:
TKS: Have you read Shrier’s book?TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/202012/new-book-irreversible-damage-is-full-misinformation?ampjecornel said:Keep educating yourself.
Shrier did not interview most of the transgender adolescents she wrote about.
Shrier's book tells the stories of several young people who came out as transgender to their parents. The book claims that these adolescents and young adults were not actually transgender, but actually just confused. The problem is Shrier didn't actually interview any of these people she wrote about.
The author’s note points out that she only interviewed their parents, who uniformly did not accept their children’s transgender identities. Many of them were estranged from their kids because the children were so hurt by their parents' rejection. To actually understand the psychology of these young people, one would need to talk to them, not simply rely on stories from parents with whom they do not speak.
To make things worse, the author's note explains that Shrier changed details in the book to ensure the transgender people she wrote about would not be able to recognize themselves. In doing so, she ensured they could not provide their side of the story or point out any inaccuracies in her reporting.
Helluva book you got there.
If not, STFU, and don’t link someone else’s opinion because it fits the narrative you want to believe.
I read the book. I didn’t get the takeaways that your link did.
Have an open mind.
@TheKobeStopper is a liberal parrot, at his best. -
Weird how so many women rant about patriarchal oppression, then will literally cut their tits off to become part of it.trublue said:Shrier’s book raises a lot of good questions that should be openly and rationally discussed, e.g., why is there a surge in gender dysphoria for teenage women wanting to become men? This was virtually non-existent pre-internet and as recently as 20 years ago.
New Diagnosis: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. -
If you’re a 32 year old woman and you have no idea you could possibly be pregnant, that’s on you.
Also, if you’re a 32 year old Woman and want to deny Science to the point of killing the baby inside of you by intentionally deceiving the caregiver trying to save your life, that’s on you too.
I blame Kobe for allowing this woman to kill her baby just because she wanted to pretend she was a man. -
Alternative theory - My Two Moms, by the Slobberer.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I'll go out on a limb and say Kobeslobber's daddy was a deadbeat or dope.
