Gender theory infecting medical schools
Comments
-
Kobe has always cared about the plight of trans men who get pregnant.TheKobeStopper said:
Hey, what if medical schools started training people using proper terminology so that when a trans man came in, and discloses that they are trans and pregnant, they can be treated properly? Dumb fuck.jecornel said:There are sever consequences to this movement.
She provided the article at no charge.
Always will. -
@TheKobeStopper is destined for public assistance, if he/she/him/ze/zir isn't already receiving it.
-
TKS doesn't use a condom?Kaepsknee said:
Kobe has always cared about the plight of trans men who get pregnant.TheKobeStopper said:
Hey, what if medical schools started training people using proper terminology so that when a trans man came in, and discloses that they are trans and pregnant, they can be treated properly? Dumb fuck.jecornel said:There are sever consequences to this movement.
She provided the article at no charge.
Always will. -
The trans mans medical records should have had him listed as a woman and mentally ill. But since we can’t say that, everyone has to pretend she’s a man or perhaps she never went to a doctor. Who knows. The consequences of playing make believe while getting society to agree that make believe is normal, is grim. What happen to the “science is real” crowd? The fact that you’re outraged that the nurse didn’t figure out the patient was a woman is even grimmer.TheKobeStopper said:
The complete lack of morals it must take to pretend to care about dead babies as you lie about how they died to make your point.jecornel said:How about when someone dies?
The trans man in that story told the nurse he had a positive on a home pregnancy test.
Imagine what a pos you would have to be to write that and you pay to read it. Fucking loser. -
Agree, they should use male and female. This whole thing would have been avoided if the proper sex was used.TheKobeStopper said:
Hey, what if medical schools started training people using proper terminology so that when a trans man came in, and discloses that they are trans and pregnant, they can be treated properly? Dumb fuck.jecornel said:There are sever consequences to this movement.
She provided the article at no charge. -
TheKobeStopper said:
Tell me what part of the review I quoted is a lie.jecornel said:I know you won’t read it.
But you can listen. There are lots of other interviews. You certainly don’t have to accept it.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/4SIh4Pt39AtGQYzMJMNkv1?si=AccLpAKtQIiRiPS5IsFxMw&dl_branch=1
You can always find a biased source like the one you quoted for the 'review'. Like your sweet twitter scoop 'proving' that Andy Ngo is a liar, or a high school girl that dared to complain about allowing boys to compete against her if they called themselves 'girls'. Keep shitpoasting. I see your tactic is to just call everyone a liar. That's cute and probably works in the little bubble that you live in. -
MikeDamone said:
Agree, they should use male and female. This whole thing would have been avoided if the proper sex was used.TheKobeStopper said:
Hey, what if medical schools started training people using proper terminology so that when a trans man came in, and discloses that they are trans and pregnant, they can be treated properly? Dumb fuck.jecornel said:There are sever consequences to this movement.
She provided the article at no charge.
-
Trans people should all be in mental institutions. Every single one
-
TKS: Have you read Shrier’s book?TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/202012/new-book-irreversible-damage-is-full-misinformation?ampjecornel said:Keep educating yourself.
Shrier did not interview most of the transgender adolescents she wrote about.
Shrier's book tells the stories of several young people who came out as transgender to their parents. The book claims that these adolescents and young adults were not actually transgender, but actually just confused. The problem is Shrier didn't actually interview any of these people she wrote about.
The author’s note points out that she only interviewed their parents, who uniformly did not accept their children’s transgender identities. Many of them were estranged from their kids because the children were so hurt by their parents' rejection. To actually understand the psychology of these young people, one would need to talk to them, not simply rely on stories from parents with whom they do not speak.
To make things worse, the author's note explains that Shrier changed details in the book to ensure the transgender people she wrote about would not be able to recognize themselves. In doing so, she ensured they could not provide their side of the story or point out any inaccuracies in her reporting.
Helluva book you got there.
If not, STFU, and don’t link someone else’s opinion because it fits the narrative you want to believe.
I read the book. I didn’t get the takeaways that your link did.
Have an open mind. -
Shrier’s book raises a lot of good questions that should be openly and rationally discussed, e.g., why is there a surge in gender dysphoria for teenage women wanting to become men? This was virtually non-existent pre-internet and as recently as 20 years ago.
New Diagnosis: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. -
Mean Abigail Shrier. Liar Abigail Shrier. Hide your eyes and cover your ears!trublue said:Shrier’s book raises a lot of good questions that should be openly and rationally discussed, e.g., why is there a surge in gender dysphoria for teenage women wanting to become men? This was virtually non-existent pre-internet and as recently as 20 years ago.
New Diagnosis: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. -
TKS: Paragraph 3 is a bald-faced lie.
Sentences 1, 2 and 3.
There were many parents interviewed. Most were progressive and accepting of their children’s transgender identities.
Making the transition and letting children make decisions of this magnitude did not prove to be a panacea for those involved, particularly the adolescents who made these life-altering decisions. -
He’s not open to diversity of thought. He thinks people who don’t think like him are evil. And should be removed from society.trublue said:
TKS: Have you read Shrier’s book?TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/202012/new-book-irreversible-damage-is-full-misinformation?ampjecornel said:Keep educating yourself.
Shrier did not interview most of the transgender adolescents she wrote about.
Shrier's book tells the stories of several young people who came out as transgender to their parents. The book claims that these adolescents and young adults were not actually transgender, but actually just confused. The problem is Shrier didn't actually interview any of these people she wrote about.
The author’s note points out that she only interviewed their parents, who uniformly did not accept their children’s transgender identities. Many of them were estranged from their kids because the children were so hurt by their parents' rejection. To actually understand the psychology of these young people, one would need to talk to them, not simply rely on stories from parents with whom they do not speak.
To make things worse, the author's note explains that Shrier changed details in the book to ensure the transgender people she wrote about would not be able to recognize themselves. In doing so, she ensured they could not provide their side of the story or point out any inaccuracies in her reporting.
Helluva book you got there.
If not, STFU, and don’t link someone else’s opinion because it fits the narrative you want to believe.
I read the book. I didn’t get the takeaways that your link did.
Have an open mind. -
BUMP TO KOBEtrublue said:TKS: Paragraph 3 is a bald-faced lie.
Sentences 1, 2 and 3.
There were many parents interviewed. Most were progressive and accepting of their children’s transgender identities.
Making the transition and letting children make decisions of this magnitude did not prove to be a panacea for those involved, particularly the adolescents who made these life-altering decisions. -
I'll go out on a limb and say Kobeslobber's daddy was a deadbeat or dope.
-
Which one?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I'll go out on a limb and say Kobeslobber's daddy was a deadbeat or dope.
-
That would require thought, which is way, way beyond @TheKobeStopper's reach.trublue said:
TKS: Have you read Shrier’s book?TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/202012/new-book-irreversible-damage-is-full-misinformation?ampjecornel said:Keep educating yourself.
Shrier did not interview most of the transgender adolescents she wrote about.
Shrier's book tells the stories of several young people who came out as transgender to their parents. The book claims that these adolescents and young adults were not actually transgender, but actually just confused. The problem is Shrier didn't actually interview any of these people she wrote about.
The author’s note points out that she only interviewed their parents, who uniformly did not accept their children’s transgender identities. Many of them were estranged from their kids because the children were so hurt by their parents' rejection. To actually understand the psychology of these young people, one would need to talk to them, not simply rely on stories from parents with whom they do not speak.
To make things worse, the author's note explains that Shrier changed details in the book to ensure the transgender people she wrote about would not be able to recognize themselves. In doing so, she ensured they could not provide their side of the story or point out any inaccuracies in her reporting.
Helluva book you got there.
If not, STFU, and don’t link someone else’s opinion because it fits the narrative you want to believe.
I read the book. I didn’t get the takeaways that your link did.
Have an open mind.
@TheKobeStopper is a liberal parrot, at his best. -
Weird how so many women rant about patriarchal oppression, then will literally cut their tits off to become part of it.trublue said:Shrier’s book raises a lot of good questions that should be openly and rationally discussed, e.g., why is there a surge in gender dysphoria for teenage women wanting to become men? This was virtually non-existent pre-internet and as recently as 20 years ago.
New Diagnosis: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. -
If you’re a 32 year old woman and you have no idea you could possibly be pregnant, that’s on you.
Also, if you’re a 32 year old Woman and want to deny Science to the point of killing the baby inside of you by intentionally deceiving the caregiver trying to save your life, that’s on you too.
I blame Kobe for allowing this woman to kill her baby just because she wanted to pretend she was a man. -
Alternative theory - My Two Moms, by the Slobberer.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I'll go out on a limb and say Kobeslobber's daddy was a deadbeat or dope.
-
-
I so want to see a massive tranny queer dyke Thunderdome match when all the queers and dykes realize the trannies have completely captured the spotlight and NOGAF about just regular old gays anymore.
-
I hope they fight back. Need more people to see just how irrational all of this shit is.Swaye said:I so want to see a massive tranny queer dyke Thunderdome match when all the queers and dykes realize the trannies have completely captured the spotlight and NOGAF about just regular old gays anymore.
-
I actually find it funny. I divorced myself from caring about men in female sports. I used to bitch about it, but not anymore. If they aren't going to fight it because they are rats, so be it. I mean there are actually Jew haters that repeatedly have been put in office for rats, if the Jews aren't going to pitch a fit because their rat politics are more important than blatant anti-semitism in their own party, so be it. Let them feast on their own.
Sit back and watch as the lesbians in sports get pissed because men dressed up like women steal their spots. It is the ultimate example of liberal politics imploding on itself. Hilariously funny and oh so popcorn worthy. The movie theater butter kind of popcorn.