Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Spring Game Overreaction Thread

13

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    Richard Newton looks the fucking part. Burst that no other rb showed yesterday. If they try to "pound it" with McGrew then this staff is fucktarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Our OL sucks, like it has always sucked. People have been predicting a "dominant" OL for 20 years, hasn't appeared, probably won't.
    Lol. The OL sucks? What a take.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Didn't make any big plays when pgos watched. He must suck.
    Dick Newton made a play. But he sucks

    Just doog things. Love the players who've done nothing. Hate the players who actually flash.
    It's doogish to fixate on certain players the way you do with such unreasoning vitriol.
    He loves to call everyone a doog but he’s one of the biggest doogs on the boreds.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    edited May 2021
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Our OL sucks, like it has always sucked. People have been predicting a "dominant" OL for 20 years, hasn't appeared, probably won't.
    Yeah but huff recruits tuff!

    Same type of doog as in my prior post.

    They know who they are.
    The OL sucks so bad they only allowed 21 pressures in 4 games and 0 legitimate sacks! So awful! They’re good in the run game. It’s almost like teams stacked the box against us last year because they weren’t afraid of Morris doing anything! We also ran out of condensed tight formations w/ vanilla scheme which is fucking stupid!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,162
    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Our OL sucks, like it has always sucked. People have been predicting a "dominant" OL for 20 years, hasn't appeared, probably won't.
    Yeah but huff recruits tuff!

    Same type of doog as in my prior post.

    They know who they are.
    The OL sucks so bad they only allowed 21 pressures in 4 games and 0 legitimate sacks! So awful! They’re good in the run game. It’s almost like teams stacked the box against us last year because they weren’t afraid of Morris doing anything! We also ran out of condensed tight formations w/ vanilla scheme which is fucking stupid!
    The OL has been an achilles heel against decent defenses for 20 years now HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,162
    backthepack said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Didn't make any big plays when pgos watched. He must suck.
    Dick Newton made a play. But he sucks

    Just doog things. Love the players who've done nothing. Hate the players who actually flash.
    It's doogish to fixate on certain players the way you do with such unreasoning vitriol.
    He loves to call everyone a doog but he’s one of the biggest doogs on the boreds.
    You say this but can never provide any examples

    Road, Haie, Race and I are the 4 most knowledgeable posters on here when it comes to football and analyzing the team and strategy.

    And youre the fucking worst rather easily.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    edited May 2021
    I'm dooging for the O Line. If they can't get it done it's scheme or Huff's coaching. Period. We're done here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,162
    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    backthepack said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Didn't make any big plays when pgos watched. He must suck.
    Dick Newton made a play. But he sucks

    Just doog things. Love the players who've done nothing. Hate the players who actually flash.
    It's doogish to fixate on certain players the way you do with such unreasoning vitriol.
    He loves to call everyone a doog but he’s one of the biggest doogs on the boreds.
    You say this but can never provide any examples

    Road, Haie, Race and I are the 4 most knowledgeable posters on here when it comes to football and analyzing the team and strategy.

    And youre the fucking worst rather easily.
    It's so convincing when someone praises themselves and then brings in other names as though that bolsters their case.

    You referred to Joe Tryon as a doog legend. You haven't laid off of Irvin for coming in cold in the 2nd half of one game, surrounded by 2nd and 3rd stringers, and giving up a couple of garbage time plays. You bash on Davis simply because posters you've targeted think he's good.

    Your football takes are simple contrarian combativeness and absolutes where absolutes don't apply. Your takes suck dude.

    If you cant tell that I have no problem against Tryon, Davis, Irvin, or even Turner I can't help you. I wish them all well. I'm just mocking the cognitively impaired that post here.

    I don't get attached to players as recruits and then frame my entire analysis around high school stars, and underwear olympics. I watch the games.

    Tryon had half a good season and has ton of potential. Hopefully TB can fully unlock it and I will be rooting for him. Not really Tryon's fault 2019 sucked.

    Davis has been hyped since he got here...and I've never seen him do anything except maybe a 15 yard run once against Arizona.

    Newton has an established history of running hard and it showed again in the spring game. Yet the same people that hype up Davis seem to be the ones who hate Rich and decided to hate him ever since he was a recruit at UW that they didn't see worthy of a scholarship. Sunday, who also ran hard, fell victim to the same thing. Both look better to me than Davis.

    Irvin doesn't have a lot to go off of, but what is there is as bad as any UW secondary player has ever looked. Maybe he turns it around, maybe he doesn't. I don't really care either way as secondary is something I trust this staff to build. If he plays well great, but I don't root for players like a fucking doog ever since I first looked at their scout pictures like some here. They know who they are.

    I hope this helps you out chuck
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    So we won?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,162
    Baseman said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    backthepack said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Didn't make any big plays when pgos watched. He must suck.
    Dick Newton made a play. But he sucks

    Just doog things. Love the players who've done nothing. Hate the players who actually flash.
    It's doogish to fixate on certain players the way you do with such unreasoning vitriol.
    He loves to call everyone a doog but he’s one of the biggest doogs on the boreds.
    You say this but can never provide any examples

    Road, Haie, Race and I are the 4 most knowledgeable posters on here when it comes to football and analyzing the team and strategy.

    And youre the fucking worst rather easily.
    It's so convincing when someone praises themselves and then brings in other names as though that bolsters their case.

    You referred to Joe Tryon as a doog legend. You haven't laid off of Irvin for coming in cold in the 2nd half of one game, surrounded by 2nd and 3rd stringers, and giving up a couple of garbage time plays. You bash on Davis simply because posters you've targeted think he's good.

    Your football takes are simple contrarian combativeness and absolutes where absolutes don't apply. Your takes suck dude.

    If you cant tell that I have no problem against Tryon, Davis, Irvin, or even Turner I can't help you. I wish them all well. I'm just mocking the cognitively impaired that post here.

    I don't get attached to players as recruits and then frame my entire analysis around high school stars, and underwear olympics. I watch the games.

    Tryon had half a good season and has ton of potential. Hopefully TB can fully unlock it and I will be rooting for him. Not really Tryon's fault 2019 sucked.

    Davis has been hyped since he got here...and I've never seen him do anything except maybe a 15 yard run once against Arizona.

    Newton has an established history of running hard and it showed again in the spring game. Yet the same people that hype up Davis seem to be the ones who hate Rich and decided to hate him ever since he was a recruit at UW that they didn't see worthy of a scholarship. Sunday, who also ran hard, fell victim to the same thing. Both look better to me than Davis.

    Irvin doesn't have a lot to go off of, but what is there is as bad as any UW secondary player has ever looked. Maybe he turns it around, maybe he doesn't. I don't really care either way as secondary is something I trust this staff to build. If he plays well great, but I don't root for players like a fucking doog ever since I first looked at their scout pictures like some here. They know who they are.

    I hope this helps you out chuck
    Haven’t seen this level of spring commentary since the USFL
    All this anal ysis for a week 2 loss to Harbaugh
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,086
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    To be fair, it feels like avoiding sacks is one thing dmo excels at.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330
    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    To be fair, it feels like avoiding sacks is one thing dmo excels at.
    Disagree. He has good awareness and gets rid of the ball quickly but the qb’s we’ve had before make him look way better at this then he actually is.

    Browning and Eason were just awful at this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Baseman said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    backthepack said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    backthepack said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Doog Legend Cam Davis did jack shit

    It’s almost like the DL raped our offensive line
    Didn't make any big plays when pgos watched. He must suck.
    Dick Newton made a play. But he sucks

    Just doog things. Love the players who've done nothing. Hate the players who actually flash.
    It's doogish to fixate on certain players the way you do with such unreasoning vitriol.
    He loves to call everyone a doog but he’s one of the biggest doogs on the boreds.
    You say this but can never provide any examples

    Road, Haie, Race and I are the 4 most knowledgeable posters on here when it comes to football and analyzing the team and strategy.

    And youre the fucking worst rather easily.
    It's so convincing when someone praises themselves and then brings in other names as though that bolsters their case.

    You referred to Joe Tryon as a doog legend. You haven't laid off of Irvin for coming in cold in the 2nd half of one game, surrounded by 2nd and 3rd stringers, and giving up a couple of garbage time plays. You bash on Davis simply because posters you've targeted think he's good.

    Your football takes are simple contrarian combativeness and absolutes where absolutes don't apply. Your takes suck dude.

    If you cant tell that I have no problem against Tryon, Davis, Irvin, or even Turner I can't help you. I wish them all well. I'm just mocking the cognitively impaired that post here.

    I don't get attached to players as recruits and then frame my entire analysis around high school stars, and underwear olympics. I watch the games.

    Tryon had half a good season and has ton of potential. Hopefully TB can fully unlock it and I will be rooting for him. Not really Tryon's fault 2019 sucked.

    Davis has been hyped since he got here...and I've never seen him do anything except maybe a 15 yard run once against Arizona.

    Newton has an established history of running hard and it showed again in the spring game. Yet the same people that hype up Davis seem to be the ones who hate Rich and decided to hate him ever since he was a recruit at UW that they didn't see worthy of a scholarship. Sunday, who also ran hard, fell victim to the same thing. Both look better to me than Davis.

    Irvin doesn't have a lot to go off of, but what is there is as bad as any UW secondary player has ever looked. Maybe he turns it around, maybe he doesn't. I don't really care either way as secondary is something I trust this staff to build. If he plays well great, but I don't root for players like a fucking doog ever since I first looked at their scout pictures like some here. They know who they are.

    I hope this helps you out chuck
    Haven’t seen this level of spring commentary since the USFL
    All this anal ysis for a week 2 loss to Harbaugh
    Did somebody say anal ISIS?


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,506
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    Yep. This o line should absolutely dominate based on experience and who is returning. If they don't, that's a huge issue. From reading practice reports, it sounds like Ale has been less than impressive
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127
    AtomicDawg said:

    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    To be fair, it feels like avoiding sacks is one thing dmo excels at.
    Disagree. He has good awareness and gets rid of the ball quickly but the qb’s we’ve had before make him look way better at this then he actually is.

    Browning and Eason were just awful at this.
    Eason was the prototypical pocket passer that is a net minus in today’s college football. I’m not against a pocket passer, but they have to be elite at playing QB and the only thing Eason is elite at is arm strength, which is the most overrated aspect of playing QB.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330
    RoadDawg55 said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    To be fair, it feels like avoiding sacks is one thing dmo excels at.
    Disagree. He has good awareness and gets rid of the ball quickly but the qb’s we’ve had before make him look way better at this then he actually is.

    Browning and Eason were just awful at this.
    Eason was the prototypical pocket passer that is a net minus in today’s college football. I’m not against a pocket passer, but they have to be elite at playing QB and the only thing Eason is elite at is arm strength, which is the most overrated aspect of playing QB.
    When Eason was able to stand in the pocket I thought he was actually good. He was pretty accurate with a huge arm.

    As soon as he moved off his spot he was a completely different player. And our wr’s were awful that year but it shows how important the ability to improvise is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,309 Founders Club
    @pawz
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    Good post roadie. The point about failing against the blitz throughout Pete's time is a good one. It actually goes back farther than that but it was one thing that really stood out to me during the Pete years. There were so many times where I saw multiple blitzers run free with multiple blockers looking for someone to block.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,265
    FremontTroll said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    Yep. This o line should absolutely dominate based on experience and who is returning. If they don't, that's a huge issue. From reading practice reports, it sounds like Ale has been less than impressive
    When you know the plays as a defender, it’s really fucking easy. Same for DL going against Ale everyday and knowing what his weaknesses are.

    A smart DT knows not to let him touch you because he’s too big and strong. The idiot, wannabe alpha males in the PAC 12 will meet him head on and get crushed. He will pancake the NT when he comes in to double team with Wattenberg.

    With that said, we were fucking horrible when Pete was coach at picking up blitzers. OL play isn’t about just being good at blocking. Half of it is knowing who to block.

    At tackle, on an island, you are normally blocking the outside pass rusher unless you are collapsing down or the defense does a stunt. At the interior positions, a lot of it is mental and being able to react quickly to different scenarios.

    It’s easier than tackle a lot of times because you have more help, but a blitzer coming free in front of the QB’s face fucks a lot of QB’s up, even if it’s a quick throw. A blitzer free from the outside only causes problems when the QB doesn’t get the ball out quick, but it also is how most strip sacks from the blindside happen.

    There are rules to a blocking scheme which is why the QB or C in the NFL always calls out who the Mike is.

    Delayed blitzes are designed to take advantage of a defender coming free after the OL is occupied with other players because the blitz doesn’t come as the ball is being snapped.
    Further proving that Roadie, haie, Race, and @PostGameOrangeSlices are the best football minds on this site.
    Considering they are all the same person....agree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,162
    edited May 2021
    FremontTroll said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Huff can’t get his group to he legitimately good (they should be dominant) then he can’t coach and should go.

    We didn’t give up a sack last year tho, so I’m not reading too much into Spring Ball, especially since they rotate and had some injuries.

    Yep. This o line should absolutely dominate based on experience and who is returning. If they don't, that's a huge issue. From reading practice reports, it sounds like Ale has been less than impressive
    When you know the plays as a defender, it’s really fucking easy. Same for DL going against Ale everyday and knowing what his weaknesses are.

    A smart DT knows not to let him touch you because he’s too big and strong. The idiot, wannabe alpha males in the PAC 12 will meet him head on and get crushed. He will pancake the NT when he comes in to double team with Wattenberg.

    With that said, we were fucking horrible when Pete was coach at picking up blitzers. OL play isn’t about just being good at blocking. Half of it is knowing who to block.

    At tackle, on an island, you are normally blocking the outside pass rusher unless you are collapsing down or the defense does a stunt. At the interior positions, a lot of it is mental and being able to react quickly to different scenarios.

    It’s easier than tackle a lot of times because you have more help, but a blitzer coming free in front of the QB’s face fucks a lot of QB’s up, even if it’s a quick throw. A blitzer free from the outside only causes problems when the QB doesn’t get the ball out quick, but it also is how most strip sacks from the blindside happen.

    There are rules to a blocking scheme which is why the QB or C in the NFL always calls out who the Mike is.

    Delayed blitzes are designed to take advantage of a defender coming free after the OL is occupied with other players because the blitz doesn’t come as the ball is being snapped.
    Further proving that Roadie, haie, Race, and @PostGameOrangeSlices are the best football minds on this site.
    The four horsemen of reality
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    After watching the spring highlights someone posted, all 5 of the first 5 running backs look good. Which honestly is a fucking problem...

    We need a back that can be featured and spelled by McGrew (solid at what he does but not a bell cow). I think Newton has proved the most, Davis could be the guy if given more touches...Pleasant is decent, Sunday runs hard....

    It's a fucking mess actually

    This is all true.

    Even a blind squirrel...well, you know how it goes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,162
    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    After watching the spring highlights someone posted, all 5 of the first 5 running backs look good. Which honestly is a fucking problem...

    We need a back that can be featured and spelled by McGrew (solid at what he does but not a bell cow). I think Newton has proved the most, Davis could be the guy if given more touches...Pleasant is decent, Sunday runs hard....

    It's a fucking mess actually

    This is all true.

    Even a blind squirrel...well, you know how it goes.
    Chuck?

    I'm always right 81% of the time
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    chuck said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    After watching the spring highlights someone posted, all 5 of the first 5 running backs look good. Which honestly is a fucking problem...

    We need a back that can be featured and spelled by McGrew (solid at what he does but not a bell cow). I think Newton has proved the most, Davis could be the guy if given more touches...Pleasant is decent, Sunday runs hard....

    It's a fucking mess actually

    This is all true.

    Even a blind squirrel...well, you know how it goes.
    Chuck?

    I'm always right 81% of the time
    I just want to see enough of Davis to see for myself. I agree the others are all good. Sunday looks a lot quicker than I expected and kind of looks like a bowling ball. I might have been off by a mile on him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter