Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Jason Brown, 2024 4* RB, Seattle (O'Dea), WA (Offered)

123578

Comments

  • Options
    DawgDaze71DawgDaze71 Member Posts: 704
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes

    He looks good but most of the film is him beating skinny white guys. I’d like to see how he does in the playoffs against better competition. Decent burst, decent speed, cutting ability.

    http://www.hudl.com/v/2LjZjY

    I hate highlights like this. If a RB is making plays that would be good in flag football that doesn't tell us what it's like when he's hit or needs to get that 4th down against a stacked box.
  • Options
    OreDawgOreDawg Member Posts: 589
    5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state
  • Options
    whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,444
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    OreDawg said:

    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state

    Is he better than Tybo?
  • Options
    ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,515
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    OreDawg said:

    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state

    You guys can have him.
  • Options
    chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,623
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    ntxduck said:

    OreDawg said:

    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state

    You guys can have him.
    My read, which is entirely biased such that it puts UW in a good light, is this: UW doesn't really want him. UO thinks they do and is recruiting him just because they can. Once it's clear that UW lost interest Oregon will too, and he'll end up settling for neither.
  • Options
    BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    ntxduck said:

    OreDawg said:

    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state

    You guys can have him.
    Thanks man
  • Options
    HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,523
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Standard Supporter
    chuck said:

    ntxduck said:

    OreDawg said:

    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state

    You guys can have him.
    My read, which is entirely biased such that it puts UW in a good light, is this: UW doesn't really want him. UO thinks they do and is recruiting him just because they can. Once it's clear that UW lost interest Oregon will too, and he'll end up settling for neither.
    His has been a Chinteresting recruitment. UW has only offered 5 RBs this year according to 247 (may an athlete or two as well) while the staff has already offered 7 RBs for 2025. UW could have as many as 6 RBs returning and can always add via the transfer portal should it drop down to 4.
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    chuck said:

    ntxduck said:

    OreDawg said:

    Couple of 6 in dongs in for the ducks today. Crazy how we are allergic to getting anyone to commit from inside the state

    You guys can have him.
    My read, which is entirely biased such that it puts UW in a good light, is this: UW doesn't really want him. UO thinks they do and is recruiting him just because they can. Once it's clear that UW lost interest Oregon will too, and he'll end up settling for neither.
    Coug incoming.
  • Options
    BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    edited September 2023
    Block, catch, put your foot down and hit the hole. In that order, in this offense.

    Brown doesn't pass the first criteria. Not saying he sucks, so don't twist
  • Options
    CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 28,907
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    Baseman said:

    Block, catch, put your foot down and hit the hole. In that order, in this offense.

    Brown doesn't pass the first criteria. Not saying he sucks, so don't twist

    Case closed
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs
    There's no question that there will be more RB/TE involvement as the season progresses and teams try to take away the WRs
  • Options
    RapeculturedawgRapeculturedawg Member Posts: 899
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    If he's any good he'll portal here in 2026 or so.
  • Options
    NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited September 2023
    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    @Baseman

    What's interesting is that to date we haven't really utilized our RBs out of the backfield in the passing game

    Probably something that we'll see a little bit more as the season goes on and teams play more shell coverages

    expect more receptions as we? play tougher teams. Hard wasting designed wheel routes for rbs when Rome/Polk/McMillan and Bernard are running free down field. I'd expect we utilize our RBs more against Oregon, SC, etc

    Talapapa was a boss last year blocking. It wasn't sexy --it was for me--but i can think of a handful of plays where he stood up a dogging LB allowing Penix to complete a key pass and prevented several sacks.

    The receiving element is definitely a criteria this staff values. Grubb said if you dont block, or block well you don't play
    Grubb hasn’t even pulled out 3 TE’s and 2 Rb’s
    on them yet. That’s a huge can of whoop ass, because all of a sudden the two running backs are actually pretty good receivers. How do you stop that?
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs
    Tequilla said:

    There's no question that there will be more RB/TE involvement as the season progresses and teams try to take away the WRs

    @Baseman

    And there we go with the importance of RBs and TEs in the passing game
Sign In or Register to comment.