Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Dream of the '90s Died in Portland

GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter


This article, man, wow.

Burke and I were speaking in front of a bakery she'd started in Portland's Kenton neighborhood. To help offset the financial ruination of COVID, local businesses had a few weeks earlier created a walking plaza, complete with outdoor seating and street art. Within the week, the plaza was ransacked and set ablaze by activists, on the run from police whose nearby union hall they'd just set on fire for the umpteenth time.

"As people of color, this is not our way of getting the message across, by tearing up other people's stuff," says Terrance Moses, head of the Kenton Business Association. "The fact of the matter is that these are young white kids destroying people's property to try and get a message across that they think is what black people want to hear."

Moses, who grew up in Kenton and who, with his adult son, physically stood in front of businesses in the neighborhood when the ransacking continued a second night, asked to meet with the activists. "'Put down your violence, come join us, and let's really get the message across,'" he says he told them. "Nobody has asked to sit down with me. All they do is just continue to argue. Some say, 'You don't get nothing the peaceful way. We've been trying the peaceful way for 30 years.'"

"I can completely see where the neighbors are upset in Kenton," one activist said following the plaza fire. "The [business owners] are saying, 'We tried to make this great area for everybody with these picnic tables. We spent time with our own materials building this, and then you burned it to make a statement to the police. And you're hurting one of the traditionally black neighborhoods in Portland, too.' So it's a little counterproductive. But there's also that stance of, well, we're here. And if we don't make this noise and respond with the violence we're being presented with from the police, then no change is going to come."
«13

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,375 Standard Supporter
    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    What's important is that people here on the board like him and that he and Flea have become close friends.

    Now imagine that your life is so pathetic you value your "friendship" with a lightweight fucking moron like Flea.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    What's important is that people here on the board like him and that he and Flea have become close friends.

    Now imagine that your life is so pathetic you value your "friendship" with a lightweight fucking moron like Flea.
    Obsessed
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,437
    edited March 2021
    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,300 Founders Club

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work from home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    Welp, this thread was DOA.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,375 Standard Supporter
    The problem is that they want to treat the entire country like Portland and Seattle. They aren't stopping until we all bend the knee.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,972
    Cool city, man!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
    Then Portland also has the "right" to have their fucking asses sued.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,437
    edited March 2021
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
    Then Portland also has the "right" to have their fucking asses sued.
    I’m sure that would work...

    If you really want to stick it to them, move across the bridge to Vancouver. Take away their tax revenue.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
    Then Portland also has the "right" to have their fucking asses sued.
    I’m sure that would work...

    If you really want to stick it to them, move across the bridge to Vancouver. Take away their tax revenue.
    Why not both?
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,570 Founders Club

    Welp, this thread was DOA.

    Keep fighting the good fight is all you can do
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,437
    edited March 2021
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
    Then Portland also has the "right" to have their fucking asses sued.
    I’m sure that would work...

    If you really want to stick it to them, move across the bridge to Vancouver. Take away their tax revenue.
    Why not both?
    Suing won't work. Sue that they don't have enough police force? Good luck with that.

    Just move like the thousands that are currently leaving. That's how you solve the problem. Let the homeless and hipsters bottom feed in the downtown area. Portland is just behind the curve. Cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Cincinnati have already completed that transition. Cities like Los Angeles are in the midst, and look for Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco to follow suit.
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Reed College grads are a fun bunch. I know a few
  • alumni94alumni94 Member Posts: 4,858
    Reed had a good Rugby team back in the day. The rest of the school seemed questionable.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
    Then Portland also has the "right" to have their fucking asses sued.
    I’m sure that would work...

    If you really want to stick it to them, move across the bridge to Vancouver. Take away their tax revenue.
    Why not both?
    Suing won't work. Sue that they don't have enough police force? Good luck with that.

    Just move like the thousands that are currently leaving. That's how you solve the problem. Let the homeless and hipsters bottom feed in the downtown area. Portland is just behind the curve. Cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Cincinnati have already completed that transition. Cities like Los Angeles are in the midst, and look for Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco to follow suit.
    No, sue that they refuse to use their police to protect business owners.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,437
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not a voting issue for Snow as this isn't a federal concern. It's not like the next President, Kameltoe wasn't bailing out these insurrectionists.

    Not very conservative of you. If a state or locality wants to negligently let their city burn at the hands of anarchists, then that's their right.
    I absolutely agree.

    Portland has a right to destroy itself from within. Once the middle and upper class complete their flee to the suburbs it will be the end of Portland. This remote work for home is no longer a fad, this will become the new norm for corporations going forward. Companies can save on rental space, and workers no longer need to live in the city. People think it's bad now, Portland hasn't even reached halftime.
    Portland has the "right" to allow other people's private property to be destroyed?
    Who's in charge of the police force? So yes. The federal government has zero jurisdiction for people's private property within in a individual state and especially a city. Kate Brown could crack down, but she won't. The federal government only has jurisdiction on it's own property and employees. In the end, this is a Wheeler and Brown issue.
    Then Portland also has the "right" to have their fucking asses sued.
    I’m sure that would work...

    If you really want to stick it to them, move across the bridge to Vancouver. Take away their tax revenue.
    Why not both?
    Suing won't work. Sue that they don't have enough police force? Good luck with that.

    Just move like the thousands that are currently leaving. That's how you solve the problem. Let the homeless and hipsters bottom feed in the downtown area. Portland is just behind the curve. Cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Cincinnati have already completed that transition. Cities like Los Angeles are in the midst, and look for Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco to follow suit.
    No, sue that they refuse to use their police to protect business owners.
    Please show where that has worked
Sign In or Register to comment.