Give Me Your Best Argument Against Voter ID
Comments
-
Why make people show ID when they enter a Federal building Dazzler? There no evidence that it prevents any crime so why do it?HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies! -
Hands Up Don't shoot? White Supremacists are attacking Asians? George Floyd was killed because he was black? Pick one.HHusky said:
What other conspiracy theories should we cater to ‘cuz the nuts need to have their “faith” restored?thechatch said:
This is patently dishonest.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response. -
So you walked into vote and said I'm dumbass and no issues?WestlinnDuck said:
Me.HustlinOwl said:
It's required where I vote. I'm not saying your're wrong, but would like to hear from some people that didn't require some kind of ID to vote.thechatch said:
You cannot legally function as an adult in the US without some form of identification. I have never met someone that doesn’t have a government ID. It’s almost impossible to be a legal citizen and not have.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Circa 2013: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/24-things-that-require-a-photo-id
There is no good argument, FYI.
Yet, it isn’t required to vote in national elections.
Someone needs to explain to me why that is acceptable. -
Nope. Just mailed in my ballot and didn't vote for any dumbasses like you did. You suck at this.HustlinOwl said:
So you walked into vote and said I'm dumbass and no issues?WestlinnDuck said:
Me.HustlinOwl said:
It's required where I vote. I'm not saying your're wrong, but would like to hear from some people that didn't require some kind of ID to vote.thechatch said:
You cannot legally function as an adult in the US without some form of identification. I have never met someone that doesn’t have a government ID. It’s almost impossible to be a legal citizen and not have.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Circa 2013: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/24-things-that-require-a-photo-id
There is no good argument, FYI.
Yet, it isn’t required to vote in national elections.
Someone needs to explain to me why that is acceptable. -
H stands here before us and declares that all U.S. elections are air-tight with no instances of fraud anywhere.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
None. Not one.
Congrats, H. You're as honest as Ferdinand Marcos. -
What a fucking retard. Seriously, you're giving Sled and DJ a run for their money.TurdBomber said:
H stands here before us and declares that all U.S. elections are air-tight with no instances of fraud anywhere.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
Try reading for comprehension sometime, TurdBrain. -
Try answering a fucking question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler. Or you could just continue to fluff Flea.HHusky said:
What a fucking retard. Seriously, you're giving Sled and DJ a run for their money.TurdBomber said:
H stands here before us and declares that all U.S. elections are air-tight with no instances of fraud anywhere.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
Try reading for comprehension sometime, TurdBrain. -
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
-
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.thechatch said:Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
-
Not having enough evidence to charge someone or to even make a case is the new "guilty" when you prosecute them in the press. Remember now, this Kunt holds himself out to be a HUGE defender of our norms and traditions. No need to make your case in a court of law, just prosecute them in the press.HHusky said:
Not enough evidence to prove criminality beyond a reasonable doubt is the new “exoneration”.RaceBannon said:
How about a Mueller investigation of fake collusion?HHusky said:
What other conspiracy theories should we cater to ‘cuz the nuts need to have their “faith” restored?thechatch said:
This is patently dishonest.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response.
