Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

An additional $4 Trillion in spending in the past year.

135678

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,591 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    "Raise the money". Is that what they call piling on taxes now?

    Fuck you.

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    "Raise the money". Is that what they call piling on taxes now?

    Fuck you.

    You mean you don't support raising taxes in order to bailout San Francisco, drugs and booze and hotel rooms for homeless people program? And why shouldn't we raise taxes to cover the Teamsters pension program? For the Dazzler, no spending is objectionable, only your unwillingness to be taxed in order to pay for this shit is objectionable, meanwhile the fucking Dazzler isn't opening up his check book to pay for any of the shit he thinks you should be paying for.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,591 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:


    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    "Raise the money". Is that what they call piling on taxes now?

    Fuck you.

    You mean you don't support raising taxes in order to bailout San Francisco, drugs and booze and hotel rooms for homeless people program? And why shouldn't we raise taxes to cover the Teamsters pension program? For the Dazzler, no spending is objectionable, only your unwillingness to be taxed in order to pay for this shit is objectionable, meanwhile the fucking Dazzler isn't opening up his check book to pay for any of the shit he thinks you should be paying for.
    Like we say, no.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    It is all my money. The acceptable rate of taxation is decided through representation. Civics 101

    When you have to resort to the kind of bullshit you piled in that post you lost already
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.