Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

An additional $4 Trillion in spending in the past year.

245678

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    edited March 2021
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    Imagine thinking that a budget that already included nearly $4 Trillion in deficit spending was an "austerity" budget that needed to spend and additional $2 Trillion in debt in order to bailout cities like SF and Chicago and the pension plan for the Teamsters.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,262 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    In 2009, yes

    This was created because of a scary virus that's a cold for most bad orange man who was going to win an election. This is on the Dimocrats.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    Yes, our problem is clearly a revenue problem and not a spending problem. Weird how you don't think raising taxes is part of any "austerity" policy but not tacking an additional $2 Trillion onto the existing $4Trillion in deficit spending is cold hard economic "austerity."

    What happened to your more fiscally responsible alternative standard you fucking fraud?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,825 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2021
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    Yes, yes the Kunt who claimed they voted for Obama because he was more fiscally responsible is clearly a deep thinker committed to a non-bumper sticker ideology.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    No you're not. There is no way in hell the Rats propose taxation levels that come anywhere close to covering this spending. Liar or moron Dazzler?