Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

An additional $4 Trillion in spending in the past year.

24

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,464 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,738 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    "Raise the money". Is that what they call piling on taxes now?

    Fuck you.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    "Raise the money". Is that what they call piling on taxes now?

    Fuck you.

    You mean you don't support raising taxes in order to bailout San Francisco, drugs and booze and hotel rooms for homeless people program? And why shouldn't we raise taxes to cover the Teamsters pension program? For the Dazzler, no spending is objectionable, only your unwillingness to be taxed in order to pay for this shit is objectionable, meanwhile the fucking Dazzler isn't opening up his check book to pay for any of the shit he thinks you should be paying for.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,738 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:


    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    So not you then

    Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending

    Brilliant
    You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.
    Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.
    You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.
    @AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?

    Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.

    $1400. Christ.

    If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.
    My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.
    "Raise the money". Is that what they call piling on taxes now?

    Fuck you.

    You mean you don't support raising taxes in order to bailout San Francisco, drugs and booze and hotel rooms for homeless people program? And why shouldn't we raise taxes to cover the Teamsters pension program? For the Dazzler, no spending is objectionable, only your unwillingness to be taxed in order to pay for this shit is objectionable, meanwhile the fucking Dazzler isn't opening up his check book to pay for any of the shit he thinks you should be paying for.
    Like we say, no.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,464 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    It is all my money. The acceptable rate of taxation is decided through representation. Civics 101

    When you have to resort to the kind of bullshit you piled in that post you lost already
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,464 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Still waiting for you to tell me why unconscionable spending is good because of "austerity" but cutting taxes is bad and has nothing to do with austerity.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,738 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
    Ideally. Yes.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Still waiting for you to tell me why unconscionable spending is good because of "austerity" but cutting taxes is bad and has nothing to do with austerity.
    I agree with you now. If the government mustn't tax anyone or anything, we shouldn't be spending any amount at all.

    #CuzItsMyMoney
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Still waiting for you to tell me why unconscionable spending is good because of "austerity" but cutting taxes is bad and has nothing to do with austerity.
    I agree with you now. If the government mustn't tax anyone or anything, we shouldn't be spending any amount at all.

    #CuzItsMyMoney
    I'm still being taxed plenty asshole. Funny how you defend completely indefensible spending because of "austerity" but when it comes to letting people keep more of the money they have earned, not all of the money, just a little more that they worked for, you have a problem with that kind of stimulus.

    You're a fucking fraud Dazzler.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,464 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
    Are you this stupid in real life? Taxes are set by elected representation. We all pay them. Doesn't make it anyone's money but mine. Just because you are afraid to answer any questions on spending is no reason to go full retard
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
    Are you this stupid in real life? Taxes are set by elected representation. We all pay them. Doesn't make it anyone's money but mine. Just because you are afraid to answer any questions on spending is no reason to go full retard
    Full retard is a feature and not a bug to a leftard.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,464 Founders Club
    Wherever could we cut spending??

    The Department of Defense has confirmed in recent memos that sex reassignment surgery could be provided free of cost as part of the military’s medical benefits package following President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25 executive order.

    "America is stronger, at home and around the world, when it is inclusive. The military is no exception," the White House said in a press release announcing the order.

    "This means no one will be separated or discharged, or denied reenlistment, solely on the basis of gender identity," the release continued. "Prospective recruits may serve in their self-identified gender when they have met the appropriate standards for accession into the military services."

    “This revised policy will also ensure all medically necessary transitionrelated care authorized by law is available to all Service members,” wrote Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in a memo obtained by the Washington Examiner.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,464 Founders Club
    Where we are headed


    https://newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/venezuela-children-of-the-trash/2021/03/10/id/1013308/

    For some children in Venezuela, garbage is the main source of their livelihood.

    This has been the case for several generations of garbage collectors in Venezuela, among them Ronaikel Brito, 16, who, like his mother when she was a child, and before her, her grandmother, looks for something of value every day in a landfill on an arid plain about five hours west of the capital, Caracas. But their work has never been so challenging: The nation’s acute economic crisis coupled with stay-at-home orders prompted by the coronavirus pandemic have reduced trash output, making valuable findings rare.

    “The reality today is that you don’t get as many things as before,” Ronaikel told The Associated Press at the landfill in Pavia, outside the city of Barquisimeto.

    “I go searching to see what I get, but I get almost nothing,” he added, noting that in recent months the children and adults who sift through garbage are spending more time trying to find objects they can sell or food in good enough condition to eat or feed horses, goats or pigs.



    Read more: Venezuelan Children Pick through Garbage for Food, Valuables | Newsmax.com
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914

    Wherever could we cut spending??

    The Department of Defense has confirmed in recent memos that sex reassignment surgery could be provided free of cost as part of the military’s medical benefits package following President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25 executive order.

    "America is stronger, at home and around the world, when it is inclusive. The military is no exception," the White House said in a press release announcing the order.

    "This means no one will be separated or discharged, or denied reenlistment, solely on the basis of gender identity," the release continued. "Prospective recruits may serve in their self-identified gender when they have met the appropriate standards for accession into the military services."

    “This revised policy will also ensure all medically necessary transitionrelated care authorized by law is available to all Service members,” wrote Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in a memo obtained by the Washington Examiner.

    You can't cut that, austerity!!!!!
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,738 Standard Supporter

    Where we are headed


    https://newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/venezuela-children-of-the-trash/2021/03/10/id/1013308/

    For some children in Venezuela, garbage is the main source of their livelihood.

    This has been the case for several generations of garbage collectors in Venezuela, among them Ronaikel Brito, 16, who, like his mother when she was a child, and before her, her grandmother, looks for something of value every day in a landfill on an arid plain about five hours west of the capital, Caracas. But their work has never been so challenging: The nation’s acute economic crisis coupled with stay-at-home orders prompted by the coronavirus pandemic have reduced trash output, making valuable findings rare.

    “The reality today is that you don’t get as many things as before,” Ronaikel told The Associated Press at the landfill in Pavia, outside the city of Barquisimeto.

    “I go searching to see what I get, but I get almost nothing,” he added, noting that in recent months the children and adults who sift through garbage are spending more time trying to find objects they can sell or food in good enough condition to eat or feed horses, goats or pigs.



    Read more: Venezuelan Children Pick through Garbage for Food, Valuables | Newsmax.com

    But but but Newsmax is your source?!?
Sign In or Register to comment.