An additional $4 Trillion in spending in the past year.
Comments
-
Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.HHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant -
Imagine thinking that a budget that already included nearly $4 Trillion in deficit spending was an "austerity" budget that needed to spend and additional $2 Trillion in debt in order to bailout cities like SF and Chicago and the pension plan for the Teamsters.
-
You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.HHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant -
In 2009, yesHHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant
This was created because of ascary virus that's a cold for mostbad orange man who was going to win an election. This is on the Dimocrats. -
Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.SFGbob said:
Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.HHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
-
Yes, our problem is clearly a revenue problem and not a spending problem. Weird how you don't think raising taxes is part of any "austerity" policy but not tacking an additional $2 Trillion onto the existing $4Trillion in deficit spending is cold hard economic "austerity."HHusky said:
You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.HHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant
What happened to your more fiscally responsible alternative standard you fucking fraud? -
@AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?HHusky said:
You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.HHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant
Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.
$1400. Christ.
If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler. -
Yes, yes the Kunt who claimed they voted for Obama because he was more fiscally responsible is clearly a deep thinker committed to a non-bumper sticker ideology.HHusky said:
Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.SFGbob said:
Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.HHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
-
My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.PurpleThrobber said:
@AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?HHusky said:
You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.HHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant
Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.
$1400. Christ.
If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler. -
No you're not. There is no way in hell the Rats propose taxation levels that come anywhere close to covering this spending. Liar or moron Dazzler?HHusky said:
My people are willing to raise the money to pay for it.PurpleThrobber said:
@AfghaniLGBTQTrainingDawg, true?HHusky said:
You have supported every single revenue reduction measure. You’re not on the high ground, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes because a Federal budget that already had over a Trillion dollars in deficit spending is the very definition of "austerity." Fucking hack.HHusky said:
You don’t do austerity in an economic crisis. It doesn’t work. History, you know.RaceBannon said:
So not you thenHHusky said:You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.
Tax your way to 8 trillion a year in spending
Brilliant
Fuck off, Dazzler. Your people just voted through so much pork it would make a Muslim change his diet.
$1400. Christ.
If you didn't catch it the first time, Fuck off, Dazzler.



