Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Biden: Chinese genocide of Uhgyurs is because ““culturally there are different norms”

NorthwestFresh
NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
They have to Epstein this guy ASAP.

He just legitimized genocide.



«13

Comments

  • Blu82
    Blu82 Member Posts: 1,671
    This is what happens when you elect a president with no balls, immediately following a president that has HUGE balls.
    Nap time for Joe.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Where is the proof of "Chinese Genocide of Ughyurs?" Besides what you've been told by the Vatican-owned, 5 Eyes MSM and Nazi Australia? The Fascists rolling out a global program of Genocide are headquartered in THE UNITED STATES, THE UNITED KINGDOM, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND, WESTERN EUROPE.
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,221 Standard Supporter
    This is actually a really, really bad look.

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited February 2021
    thechatch said:

    This is actually a really, really bad look.

    I don’t see how he walks this one back. It may take a few days to gain traction but that should be in every 2022 House and Senate race. He defended genocide for “cultural” reasons.

    It’s a real “Very Fine People” moment and it’s within context and accurate.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    It’s OK for China to kill Muslims because China has been victimized by the West in the past.

    I’ve never heard anything like what Biden’s said from any politician, maybe Ihan Omar but she’s a much lesser scale, to excuse hundreds of thousands of people being imprisoned, raped, and executed for their religion.

    That’s why DC looks like Pyongyang or Beijing now.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,831 Founders Club
    Thats ok Joe still hates America 🇺🇸
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    Thats ok Joe still hates America 🇺🇸

    Probably fed him the lines to push him aside. It’s how you get rid of dumbass CEOs, too.

    Anderson Vanderbilt didn’t even react immediately.

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    He has video of it in other Tweets.

    “Vee neeed to seeee your papers.”

    East Berlin or Pyongyang?

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Zero Biden Leftists tonight even trying to defend Biden’s completely unacceptable words on the CCP killing and raping people because of their religion.

    None. Where to go from here, @HHusky? Not Trump doesn’t immediately denounce the genocide and rape victims of Muslims.

    The best part for H is that if one of the Muslims gets pregnant, she gets a forced abortion.

    Biden’s America.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,726 Standard Supporter
    Biden suporters just want the USA destroyed and gone.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,661 Founders Club
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    Biden suporters just want the USA destroyed and gone.

    Useful idiots.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,045

    Sledog said:

    Biden suporters just want the USA destroyed and gone.

    Useful idiots.
    There are many fine useful idiots.

    Most of them post here under the coronabros banner.

  • Duckwithabone
    Duckwithabone Member Posts: 272

    Zero Biden Leftists tonight even trying to defend Biden’s completely unacceptable words on the CCP killing and raping people because of their religion.

    None. Where to go from here, @HHusky? Not Trump doesn’t immediately denounce the genocide and rape victims of Muslims.

    The best part for H is that if one of the Muslims gets pregnant, she gets a forced abortion.

    Biden’s America.

    If I was unemployed and lived in my basement I could probably be on this site as often and muster just as much false righteous outrage as you. But some of us have to keep this country running while 40% sit on the internet getting angry all day. Take a walk for perspective, and maybe a little exercise.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,661 Founders Club
    Where are the celebrities that were so outraged by Dharfor?
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    wHY dOnT tHeY fOrM THeir oWN coUnTRY?!?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,726 Standard Supporter

    Zero Biden Leftists tonight even trying to defend Biden’s completely unacceptable words on the CCP killing and raping people because of their religion.

    None. Where to go from here, @HHusky? Not Trump doesn’t immediately denounce the genocide and rape victims of Muslims.

    The best part for H is that if one of the Muslims gets pregnant, she gets a forced abortion.

    Biden’s America.

    If I was unemployed and lived in my basement I could probably be on this site as often and muster just as much false righteous outrage as you. But some of us have to keep this country running while 40% sit on the internet getting angry all day. Take a walk for perspective, and maybe a little exercise.
    What's your great contribution to society you make with your work product? Curious.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,831 Founders Club

    THE PRESIDENT: We must speak up for human rights. It’s who we are. We can’t — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We’re — a two-hour conversation.

    MR. COOPER: You talked about this to him?

    THE PRESIDENT: I talked about this, too. And that’s not so much refugee, but I talked about — I said — look, you know, Chinese leaders — if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been — the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home. So the central — to vastly overstate it — the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.

    I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful — I said — and by the — he said he — he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they — their leaders — are expected to follow.

    But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president — that’s how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu — not a joke — his predecessor, President Hu — and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.

    And I came back and said they’re going to end their One China — their one child policy, because they’re so xenophobic, they won’t let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?

    MR. COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I’m doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other — other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.

    China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries. And as long as they’re engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it’s going to be hard for them to do that.

    But it’s much more complicated than that. I’m — I shouldn’t have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.




    Full text since this tweet that cuts him off mid-sentence is a shitty bit to draw actual conclusions from.

    But frankly this is Trump levels of rambling. And it's a pretty sackless stance against what is damn near Nazi levels of human rights abuse. So once again we are pussy-footing around China and showing our hand - which is empty. We're not going to do shit while an ethnic minority is systematically raped, sterilized, and persecuted by a world superpower.

    BUT TRUMP

    Who called out China on the bullshit but still can't criticize Joe without some Trump thrown in
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,256 Founders Club

    THE PRESIDENT: We must speak up for human rights. It’s who we are. We can’t — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We’re — a two-hour conversation.

    MR. COOPER: You talked about this to him?

    THE PRESIDENT: I talked about this, too. And that’s not so much refugee, but I talked about — I said — look, you know, Chinese leaders — if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been — the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home. So the central — to vastly overstate it — the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.

    I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful — I said — and by the — he said he — he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they — their leaders — are expected to follow.

    But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president — that’s how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu — not a joke — his predecessor, President Hu — and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.

    And I came back and said they’re going to end their One China — their one child policy, because they’re so xenophobic, they won’t let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?

    MR. COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I’m doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other — other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.

    China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries. And as long as they’re engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it’s going to be hard for them to do that.

    But it’s much more complicated than that. I’m — I shouldn’t have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.




    Full text since this tweet that cuts him off mid-sentence is a shitty bit to draw actual conclusions from.

    But frankly this is Trump levels of rambling. And it's a pretty sackless stance against what is damn near Nazi levels of human rights abuse. So once again we are pussy-footing around China and showing our hand - which is empty. We're not going to do shit while an ethnic minority is systematically raped, sterilized, and persecuted by a world superpower.

    So much nonsense my ADD couldn’t keep up
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    THE PRESIDENT: We must speak up for human rights. It’s who we are. We can’t — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We’re — a two-hour conversation.

    MR. COOPER: You talked about this to him?

    THE PRESIDENT: I talked about this, too. And that’s not so much refugee, but I talked about — I said — look, you know, Chinese leaders — if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been — the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home. So the central — to vastly overstate it — the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.

    I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful — I said — and by the — he said he — he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they — their leaders — are expected to follow.

    But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president — that’s how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu — not a joke — his predecessor, President Hu — and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.

    And I came back and said they’re going to end their One China — their one child policy, because they’re so xenophobic, they won’t let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?

    MR. COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I’m doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other — other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.

    China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries. And as long as they’re engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it’s going to be hard for them to do that.

    But it’s much more complicated than that. I’m — I shouldn’t have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.




    Full text since this tweet that cuts him off mid-sentence is a shitty bit to draw actual conclusions from.

    But frankly this is Trump levels of rambling. And it's a pretty sackless stance against what is damn near Nazi levels of human rights abuse. So once again we are pussy-footing around China and showing our hand - which is empty. We're not going to do shit while an ethnic minority is systematically raped, sterilized, and persecuted by a world superpower.

    BUT TRUMP

    Who called out China on the bullshit but still can't criticize Joe without some Trump thrown in
    As someone in active recovery of TDS (and AIDS) you'll have to forgive me for the occasional slip of his name. Cold turkey is never 100% effective. The point is that Biden is now in and it looks like more of the same virtue signaling bullshit when it comes to being the "protector of human rights" or whatever other self-righteous bullshit we like to delude ourselves with.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,831 Founders Club

    THE PRESIDENT: We must speak up for human rights. It’s who we are. We can’t — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We’re — a two-hour conversation.

    MR. COOPER: You talked about this to him?

    THE PRESIDENT: I talked about this, too. And that’s not so much refugee, but I talked about — I said — look, you know, Chinese leaders — if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been — the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home. So the central — to vastly overstate it — the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.

    I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful — I said — and by the — he said he — he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they — their leaders — are expected to follow.

    But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president — that’s how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu — not a joke — his predecessor, President Hu — and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.

    And I came back and said they’re going to end their One China — their one child policy, because they’re so xenophobic, they won’t let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?

    MR. COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I’m doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other — other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.

    China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries. And as long as they’re engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it’s going to be hard for them to do that.

    But it’s much more complicated than that. I’m — I shouldn’t have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.




    Full text since this tweet that cuts him off mid-sentence is a shitty bit to draw actual conclusions from.

    But frankly this is Trump levels of rambling. And it's a pretty sackless stance against what is damn near Nazi levels of human rights abuse. So once again we are pussy-footing around China and showing our hand - which is empty. We're not going to do shit while an ethnic minority is systematically raped, sterilized, and persecuted by a world superpower.

    BUT TRUMP

    Who called out China on the bullshit but still can't criticize Joe without some Trump thrown in
    As someone in active recovery of TDS (and AIDS) you'll have to forgive me for the occasional slip of his name. Cold turkey is never 100% effective. The point is that Biden is now in and it looks like more of the same virtue signaling bullshit when it comes to being the "protector of human rights" or whatever other self-righteous bullshit we like to delude ourselves with.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.
    Trump actually took action against China and if you are concerned then you did not vote wisely.

    There is nothing equivalent about the treatment of China by Trump and by China's lackey Biden.

    And Biden is president now.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    THE PRESIDENT: We must speak up for human rights. It’s who we are. We can’t — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We’re — a two-hour conversation.

    MR. COOPER: You talked about this to him?

    THE PRESIDENT: I talked about this, too. And that’s not so much refugee, but I talked about — I said — look, you know, Chinese leaders — if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been — the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home. So the central — to vastly overstate it — the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.

    I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful — I said — and by the — he said he — he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they — their leaders — are expected to follow.

    But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president — that’s how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu — not a joke — his predecessor, President Hu — and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.

    And I came back and said they’re going to end their One China — their one child policy, because they’re so xenophobic, they won’t let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?

    MR. COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I’m doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other — other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.

    China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries. And as long as they’re engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it’s going to be hard for them to do that.

    But it’s much more complicated than that. I’m — I shouldn’t have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.




    Full text since this tweet that cuts him off mid-sentence is a shitty bit to draw actual conclusions from.

    But frankly this is Trump levels of rambling. And it's a pretty sackless stance against what is damn near Nazi levels of human rights abuse. So once again we are pussy-footing around China and showing our hand - which is empty. We're not going to do shit while an ethnic minority is systematically raped, sterilized, and persecuted by a world superpower.

    BUT TRUMP

    Who called out China on the bullshit but still can't criticize Joe without some Trump thrown in
    As someone in active recovery of TDS (and AIDS) you'll have to forgive me for the occasional slip of his name. Cold turkey is never 100% effective. The point is that Biden is now in and it looks like more of the same virtue signaling bullshit when it comes to being the "protector of human rights" or whatever other self-righteous bullshit we like to delude ourselves with.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.
    Trump actually took action against China and if you are concerned then you did not vote wisely.

    There is nothing equivalent about the treatment of China by Trump and by China's lackey Biden.

    And Biden is president now.
    Are you talking about this?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_Human_Rights_Policy_Act

    Or is there something else Trump did that actually combatted the Uyghur genocide?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,831 Founders Club
    Biden is president now

    If you don't know how Trump challenged China and have forgotten the response from the American sell out the country team then it really doesn't matter now does it?

    China got their guy in
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    Biden is president now

    If you don't know how Trump challenged China and have forgotten the response from the American sell out the country team then it really doesn't matter now does it?

    China got their guy in

    You could've just said no.

    So we're on the same page. Joe is the new useless figurehead who won't actually do shit about China. I look forward to our next four years of unified criticism.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,831 Founders Club
    Trump wasn't useless and its OK to say Joe is owned by China all on its own

    I voted for the guy that was actively working against China. You voted for their lackey so I don't see any agreement here at all

    Live with your decision