Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Biden DOJ arrest guy who posted voting meme in 2016.

124»

Comments

  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,406
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Sure you have

    Who are the conspirators?
  • Options
    NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.



    If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
    H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theory

    Because the cops said so

    Bootlicker
    The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.
    Yes they are. You support the bogus charges. It’s not a surprise at all that you do.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Sure you have

    Who are the conspirators?

    Daddy and Rush Limbaugh.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,182
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.



    If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
    H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theory

    Because the cops said so

    Bootlicker
    The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.
    Yes they are. You support the bogus charges. It’s not a surprise at all that you do.
    You're not reading closely. I simply said the conspiracy element is there, if this conduct otherwise fits the crime.

    I don't actually think every reprehensible act should be criminalized. You can breathe a little easier.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,814
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited January 2021
    Shit were all going to jail for posing memes! Even the Dazzler.

    How many years for a Sig?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,406
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.



    If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
    H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theory

    Because the cops said so

    Bootlicker
    The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.
    Yes they are. You support the bogus charges. It’s not a surprise at all that you do.
    You're not reading closely. I simply said the conspiracy element is there, if this conduct otherwise fits the crime.

    I don't actually think every reprehensible act should be criminalized. You can breathe a little easier.
    Backtracking

    Those names of the conspirators?


    Sounds like you have a conspiracy theory here. Did you get it from Q?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,182
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.



    If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
    H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theory

    Because the cops said so

    Bootlicker
    The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.
    Yes they are. You support the bogus charges. It’s not a surprise at all that you do.
    You're not reading closely. I simply said the conspiracy element is there, if this conduct otherwise fits the crime.

    I don't actually think every reprehensible act should be criminalized. You can breathe a little easier.
    Backtracking

    Those names of the conspirators?


    Sounds like you have a conspiracy theory here. Did you get it from Q?
    The people involved had their communications online. The guy charged remained anonymous for some time too.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,406
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.



    If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
    H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theory

    Because the cops said so

    Bootlicker
    The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.
    Yes they are. You support the bogus charges. It’s not a surprise at all that you do.
    You're not reading closely. I simply said the conspiracy element is there, if this conduct otherwise fits the crime.

    I don't actually think every reprehensible act should be criminalized. You can breathe a little easier.
    Backtracking

    Those names of the conspirators?


    Sounds like you have a conspiracy theory here. Did you get it from Q?
    The people involved had their communications online. The guy charged remained anonymous for some time too.
    Qanan nut
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”

    A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.

    "Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
    Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
    No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
    You did though. It’s in the thread.

    “conspiracy”

    Dipshit lies repeatedly.
    that makes no sense. sad.
    Thoughts?

    This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.

    This lady is still free and will not be prosecuted because Orange Man Bad. And because we live in a banana republic with a 2-tier justice system based on your political beliefs.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,814
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.



    If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
    H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theory

    Because the cops said so

    Bootlicker
    The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.
    Yes they are. You support the bogus charges. It’s not a surprise at all that you do.
    You're not reading closely. I simply said the conspiracy element is there, if this conduct otherwise fits the crime.

    I don't actually think every reprehensible act should be criminalized. You can breathe a little easier.
    Backtracking

    Those names of the conspirators?


    Sounds like you have a conspiracy theory here. Did you get it from Q?
    The people involved had their communications online. The guy charged remained anonymous for some time too.
    Funny how ANTIFA/BLM used online services for planning and organizing riots around the whole country including the capitol but no arrests with the same charges. It's almost like people are being targeted based on their political party.
Sign In or Register to comment.