Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
You did though. It’s in the thread.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
that makes no sense. sad.
Thoughts?
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
You did though. It’s in the thread.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
that makes no sense. sad.
Thoughts?
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
You did though. It’s in the thread.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
that makes no sense. sad.
Thoughts?
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.
You did though. It’s in the thread.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
that makes no sense. sad.
Thoughts?
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Yeah but conspiracy
The statute requires a conspiracy.
Reading is fundamental.
Conspiracy? That’s domestic terrorism now if you’re on the Right.
Leftists can coordinate attacks on federal buildings online and you applaud it.
Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Yeah but conspiracy
The statute requires a conspiracy.
Reading is fundamental.
Conspiracy? That’s domestic terrorism now if you’re on the Right.
Leftists can coordinate attacks on federal buildings online and you applaud it.
When precisely did I "applaud" attacks on federal buildings, Boris?
Comments
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
You’re basically Lt. Daniel Kaffee.
lol
Good move?
Good work, good effort.
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Reading is fundamental.
Leftists can coordinate attacks on federal buildings online and you applaud it.
Democrats never did like it. Racists
Because the cops said so
Bootlicker