Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Joe Rogan / political climate
jecornel
Member Posts: 9,727
in Tug Tavern
If this country wanted to work toward the "heal," at least at the government level??
Have Hawley, Cruz, AOC, Booker for a three or four hour debate and put it on every network. Maybe replace Cruz with Tulsi.
The 140 character clap back is a total joke and only agitates.
Don't twist, I don't think much would get done, but so much of the American population is so out of touch they need the figureheads to duke it out. Hawley though would demolish AOC in a debate.
MSM is strictly for hatred and division. And people are glued to the garbage.
Have Hawley, Cruz, AOC, Booker for a three or four hour debate and put it on every network. Maybe replace Cruz with Tulsi.
The 140 character clap back is a total joke and only agitates.
Don't twist, I don't think much would get done, but so much of the American population is so out of touch they need the figureheads to duke it out. Hawley though would demolish AOC in a debate.
MSM is strictly for hatred and division. And people are glued to the garbage.
Comments
Either they stormed the gate, damaged shit and broke the law or they didn't. This subjective 'incited violence' is bullshit.
Otherwise, feels.
Remember when Booker called for attacks on the GOP, “go to the Hiil,” and it led to the harassment of GOP politicians in public? Neither does anyone else because the Rat Media ignored it.
Two Americas
Take AOC off the table, add every billionaire and you got yourself a deal.
"Every single person that attacked the capitol and federal and civil buildings in locations around the country, and incited them needs to either go to jail or be kicked the fuck out of our government. Until then, fuck your healings."
Strong words. I believe I understand your perspective. I agree to some extent. People who caused damage or broke laws should be arrested and prosecuted. Being there, however, in and of itself is not a crime. Being a conservative does not mean you're an insurrectionist or even cheered these people on. On top of that, "Incited" is a gray area for me...
Just so I can understand if your perspective on this is consistent, could you answer this?
What about the people responsible for 19+ deaths and over a billion dollars in property damage during the months of protests for George Floyd? What about the media who provided their support? What about the politicians who supported it? What's your stance on them? I'm talking rioters causing damage, people burning shit down, looters, etc. Antifa, BLM, whatever. People breaking the law.
What's your stance?
Like the other two members of the Trinity, Washington DC is an occupation power run by the NWO, and has no legitimate right to rule anything but the District of Columbia.
I think anybody debating her would do well to get a good night's sleep and be prepared. She's a good paper hanger.
That said, of fucking course: prosecute to the fullest extent of the law any protestor of any political persuasion, and of any race, gender, religion or other variable, from summer, winter or fall, who destroyed property, stole, assaulted anyone, resisted arrest, and did anything else illegal north of J walking.
That's like illegal immigration rhetoric. Unless you're a complete nut, and there are plenty to go around, of course you say prosecute the doers of illegal things. Who could not be for that? I've never seen anything in the media to suggest otherwise, but I'm sure there's something. That's different and to be distinguished from the media pushing the narrative that Floyd touched off a bunch of shit and that people are rightfully fed up. But then again, I'm also not one laying the blame for this at Trump's feet.
Sounds good to me.