I'm using 1997...you know...a year before...1998. You can use any of those years though if it makes you feel better. It doesn't change the trend.
And keep ignoring any and all discussions on the CO2 levels, climate models, and such that contradict everything you say.
You really aren't good at this...
Such scientific dishonesty is rare. "It doesn't change the trend"? Really fuck man do you know how to read a graph?
So 1997/98 was a spike which can be explained due to an El Nino occurrence that year. Your graph sets a flat trendline which is both wrong and dishonest because the values before were much lower. You can't start at '97/'98 because it was a fucking anomaly dingus. Also, that graph was wrong.
8 of the 10 warmest years on record came after 2000. It's possible they "leveled" for the time being. But that has been explained thru natural variability based on La Nina/El Nino. The temperature sure as hell hasn't been declining. I can't believe you even suggested that. Fuck man.
What climate models are you talking about? The trendline has generally followed the models. There's obviously a variability year to year that affects what happens. Here's James Hansen's climate model prediction which seems to follow very closely to the actual observed temperatures.
You really aren't good at this. Every point you bring up is a cliched climate denial theory that comes from cherry picking facts, and can be debunked by looking at the bigger picture. You must be a small thinker.
CollegDoog is true to his faith. Science has nothing to do with it. It's just the latest Blame America crowd fooling the foolish youth. When he defended China he should have lit himself on fire. It was the proof of what he was mocking me for on one of these threads - that global cooling warming changing is simply anti capitalism in another package for the useful idiots to cling to. Bitter clingers if you will
He's moved so many goalposts that he's now completely lost. He veers between imminent danger of planet death to hey we don't have a solution but someday we might so buy some fucked up lightbulbs and hybrid cars that have hazardous waste batteries that cost more in carbon to make than they save in use.
But you'll feel better. Hallelujah. Everyone is stupid who doesn't agree with his fucked up "arguments" that change every time he gets his ass kicked
LOL you've had your ass kicked so many times (Richard Lindzen) you fall back on the "scare the youth", "anti-capitalism", "it's a religion" ridiculousness.
What goal posts have I moved? I have to argue with 5 people at a time in most threads and have to debunk a lot of stupidity.
I've been consistent on a plan to ease off fossil fuels but you must keep glossing over that.
I'll backtrack a little on China. Obviously they're not going to be the leader in curbing climate change, but they're also not a monstrosity that can't be reasoned with. They're slowing economic growth to cut emissions. They're pouring money into solar technology. They burn the shit out of coal and will continue to do so in the short term but they're not committed to it in the long term. And for fucks sake I haven't been praising them. That's an example of how you oversimplify my argument to fit your narrative, which has been both amusing and frustrating.
CollegDoog is true to his faith. Science has nothing to do with it. It's just the latest Blame America crowd fooling the foolish youth. When he defended China he should have lit himself on fire. It was the proof of what he was mocking me for on one of these threads - that global cooling warming changing is simply anti capitalism in another package for the useful idiots to cling to. Bitter clingers if you will
He's moved so many goalposts that he's now completely lost. He veers between imminent danger of planet death to hey we don't have a solution but someday we might so buy some fucked up lightbulbs and hybrid cars that have hazardous waste batteries that cost more in carbon to make than they save in use.
But you'll feel better. Hallelujah. Everyone is stupid who doesn't agree with his fucked up "arguments" that change every time he gets his ass kicked
LOL you've had your ass kicked so many times (Richard Lindzen) you fall back on the "scare the youth", "anti-capitalism", "it's a religion" ridiculousness.
What goal posts have I moved? I have to argue with 5 people at a time in most threads and have to debunk a lot of stupidity.
I've been consistent on a plan to ease off fossil fuels but you must keep glossing over that.
I'll backtrack a little on China. Obviously they're not going to be the leader in curbing climate change, but they're also not a monstrosity that can't be reasoned with. They're slowing economic growth to cut emissions. They're pouring money into solar technology. They burn the shit out of coal and will continue to do so in the short term but they're not committed to it in the long term. And for fucks sake I haven't been praising them. That's an example of how you oversimplify my argument to fit your narrative, which has been both amusing and frustrating.
Sorry dude, but China is exactly that. Not a monstrosity, but as long as there is profit to be made by exploiting their people, they won't change for anyone, and no one will be able to force them to. Their advances in technology might eventually help your cause in the form of solar panels, but they're doing it strictly for the cash. And they're too fucking slow. It's been years since I read about them developing a technology where an individual can print solar cells on a computer. As of yet, I haven't seen any in the local Office Depot.
CollegDoog is true to his faith. Science has nothing to do with it. It's just the latest Blame America crowd fooling the foolish youth. When he defended China he should have lit himself on fire. It was the proof of what he was mocking me for on one of these threads - that global cooling warming changing is simply anti capitalism in another package for the useful idiots to cling to. Bitter clingers if you will
He's moved so many goalposts that he's now completely lost. He veers between imminent danger of planet death to hey we don't have a solution but someday we might so buy some fucked up lightbulbs and hybrid cars that have hazardous waste batteries that cost more in carbon to make than they save in use.
But you'll feel better. Hallelujah. Everyone is stupid who doesn't agree with his fucked up "arguments" that change every time he gets his ass kicked
LOL you've had your ass kicked so many times (Richard Lindzen) you fall back on the "scare the youth", "anti-capitalism", "it's a religion" ridiculousness.
What goal posts have I moved? I have to argue with 5 people at a time in most threads and have to debunk a lot of stupidity.
I've been consistent on a plan to ease off fossil fuels but you must keep glossing over that.
I'll backtrack a little on China. Obviously they're not going to be the leader in curbing climate change, but they're also not a monstrosity that can't be reasoned with. They're slowing economic growth to cut emissions. They're pouring money into solar technology. They burn the shit out of coal and will continue to do so in the short term but they're not committed to it in the long term. And for fucks sake I haven't been praising them. That's an example of how you oversimplify my argument to fit your narrative, which has been both amusing and frustrating.
CollegDoog is true to his faith. Science has nothing to do with it. It's just the latest Blame America crowd fooling the foolish youth. When he defended China he should have lit himself on fire. It was the proof of what he was mocking me for on one of these threads - that global cooling warming changing is simply anti capitalism in another package for the useful idiots to cling to. Bitter clingers if you will
He's moved so many goalposts that he's now completely lost. He veers between imminent danger of planet death to hey we don't have a solution but someday we might so buy some fucked up lightbulbs and hybrid cars that have hazardous waste batteries that cost more in carbon to make than they save in use.
But you'll feel better. Hallelujah. Everyone is stupid who doesn't agree with his fucked up "arguments" that change every time he gets his ass kicked
LOL you've had your ass kicked so many times (Richard Lindzen) you fall back on the "scare the youth", "anti-capitalism", "it's a religion" ridiculousness.
What goal posts have I moved? I have to argue with 5 people at a time in most threads and have to debunk a lot of stupidity.
I've been consistent on a plan to ease off fossil fuels but you must keep glossing over that.
I'll backtrack a little on China. Obviously they're not going to be the leader in curbing climate change, but they're also not a monstrosity that can't be reasoned with. They're slowing economic growth to cut emissions. They're pouring money into solar technology. They burn the shit out of coal and will continue to do so in the short term but they're not committed to it in the long term. And for fucks sake I haven't been praising them. That's an example of how you oversimplify my argument to fit your narrative, which has been both amusing and frustrating.
CollegDoog is true to his faith. Science has nothing to do with it. It's just the latest Blame America crowd fooling the foolish youth. When he defended China he should have lit himself on fire. It was the proof of what he was mocking me for on one of these threads - that global cooling warming changing is simply anti capitalism in another package for the useful idiots to cling to. Bitter clingers if you will
He's moved so many goalposts that he's now completely lost. He veers between imminent danger of planet death to hey we don't have a solution but someday we might so buy some fucked up lightbulbs and hybrid cars that have hazardous waste batteries that cost more in carbon to make than they save in use.
But you'll feel better. Hallelujah. Everyone is stupid who doesn't agree with his fucked up "arguments" that change every time he gets his ass kicked
LOL you've had your ass kicked so many times (Richard Lindzen) you fall back on the "scare the youth", "anti-capitalism", "it's a religion" ridiculousness.
What goal posts have I moved? I have to argue with 5 people at a time in most threads and have to debunk a lot of stupidity.
I've been consistent on a plan to ease off fossil fuels but you must keep glossing over that.
I'll backtrack a little on China. Obviously they're not going to be the leader in curbing climate change, but they're also not a monstrosity that can't be reasoned with. They're slowing economic growth to cut emissions. They're pouring money into solar technology. They burn the shit out of coal and will continue to do so in the short term but they're not committed to it in the long term. And for fucks sake I haven't been praising them. That's an example of how you oversimplify my argument to fit your narrative, which has been both amusing and frustrating.
I find it funny how CollegeDoog claims everyone else has gotten their ass kicked in this thread yet he is the only fucktard preaching his liberal bullshit. This is just getting desperate, sad, and pathetic, he will do anything to push the agenda of the extreme left. Even Rachel Maddow at this point might start laughing at how far left he is going with his anti capitalism remarks.
I find it funny how CollegeDoog claims everyone else has gotten their ass kicked in this thread yet he is the only fucktard preaching his liberal bullshit. This is just getting desperate, sad, and pathetic, he will do anything to push the agenda of the extreme left. Even Rachel Maddow at this point might start laughing at how far left he is going with his anti capitalism remarks.
I find it funny how CollegeDoog claims everyone else has gotten their ass kicked in this thread yet he is the only fucktard preaching his liberal bullshit. This is just getting desperate, sad, and pathetic, he will do anything to push the agenda of the extreme left. Even Rachel Maddow at this point might start laughing at how far left he is going with his anti capitalism remarks.
Actually you only know my views on race and global warming.
You don't know what I think about other issues related to the economy and why I would have voted for Mitt.
You, Race, others just use the Rachel Maddow line/liberal bullshit to hide behind an ignorance and discredit my posts. Scare lines like an "anti capitalist agenda"? C'mon man.
It must suck to see the world in left/right agendas.
I find it funny how CollegeDoog claims everyone else has gotten their ass kicked in this thread yet he is the only fucktard preaching his liberal bullshit. This is just getting desperate, sad, and pathetic, he will do anything to push the agenda of the extreme left. Even Rachel Maddow at this point might start laughing at how far left he is going with his anti capitalism remarks.
Actually you only know my views on race and global warming.
You don't know what I think about other issues related to the economy and why I would have voted for Mitt.
You, Race, others just use the Rachel Maddow line/liberal bullshit to hide behind an ignorance and discredit my posts. Scare lines like an "anti capitalist agenda"? C'mon man.
It must suck to see the world in left/right agendas.
Keep yapping. We've seen enough. You suck at economics more than anything else. That has been established by your posts. You see the world in left right agendas more than anyone here. The fact you don't think you do is sad.
I find it funny how CollegeDoog claims everyone else has gotten their ass kicked in this thread yet he is the only fucktard preaching his liberal bullshit. This is just getting desperate, sad, and pathetic, he will do anything to push the agenda of the extreme left. Even Rachel Maddow at this point might start laughing at how far left he is going with his anti capitalism remarks.
Actually you only know my views on race and global warming.
You don't know what I think about other issues related to the economy and why I would have voted for Mitt.
You, Race, others just use the Rachel Maddow line/liberal bullshit to hide behind an ignorance and discredit my posts. Scare lines like an "anti capitalist agenda"? C'mon man.
It must suck to see the world in left/right agendas.
Keep yapping. We've seen enough. You suck at economics more than anything else. That has been established by your posts. You see the world in left right agendas more than anyone here. The fact you don't think you do is sad.
I find it funny how CollegeDoog claims everyone else has gotten their ass kicked in this thread yet he is the only fucktard preaching his liberal bullshit. This is just getting desperate, sad, and pathetic, he will do anything to push the agenda of the extreme left. Even Rachel Maddow at this point might start laughing at how far left he is going with his anti capitalism remarks.
Actually you only know my views on race and global warming.
You don't know what I think about other issues related to the economy and why I would have voted for Mitt.
You, Race, others just use the Rachel Maddow line/liberal bullshit to hide behind an ignorance and discredit my posts. Scare lines like an "anti capitalist agenda"? C'mon man.
It must suck to see the world in left/right agendas.
Keep yapping. We've seen enough. You suck at economics more than anything else. That has been established by your posts. You see the world in left right agendas more than anyone here. The fact you don't think you do is sad.
The global warming, excuse me, climate change argument is getting painful. CollegeDoog, please tell me that you and your college buddies don't sit around talking about this shit. I think it's time to transfer from Middlebury. Do you game on chicks by going, "how bout them wood chips?"
The global warming, excuse me, climate change argument is getting painful. CollegeDoog, please tell me that you and your college buddies don't sit around talking about this shit. I think it's time to transfer from Middlebury.
They talk about it over glasses of 2014 Boone's strawberry wine while planning which investment banks with polar opposite values to those they've temporarily adopted, they'll be working for after they get their liberal arts degrees.
The global warming, excuse me, climate change argument is getting painful. CollegeDoog, please tell me that you and your college buddies don't sit around talking about this shit. I think it's time to transfer from Middlebury.
The global warming, excuse me, climate change argument is getting painful. CollegeDoog, please tell me that you and your college buddies don't sit around talking about this shit. I think it's time to transfer from Middlebury.
Comments
So 1997/98 was a spike which can be explained due to an El Nino occurrence that year. Your graph sets a flat trendline which is both wrong and dishonest because the values before were much lower. You can't start at '97/'98 because it was a fucking anomaly dingus. Also, that graph was wrong.
8 of the 10 warmest years on record came after 2000. It's possible they "leveled" for the time being. But that has been explained thru natural variability based on La Nina/El Nino. The temperature sure as hell hasn't been declining. I can't believe you even suggested that. Fuck man.
What climate models are you talking about? The trendline has generally followed the models. There's obviously a variability year to year that affects what happens. Here's James Hansen's climate model prediction which seems to follow very closely to the actual observed temperatures.
You really aren't good at this. Every point you bring up is a cliched climate denial theory that comes from cherry picking facts, and can be debunked by looking at the bigger picture. You must be a small thinker.
What goal posts have I moved? I have to argue with 5 people at a time in most threads and have to debunk a lot of stupidity.
I've been consistent on a plan to ease off fossil fuels but you must keep glossing over that.
I'll backtrack a little on China. Obviously they're not going to be the leader in curbing climate change, but they're also not a monstrosity that can't be reasoned with. They're slowing economic growth to cut emissions. They're pouring money into solar technology. They burn the shit out of coal and will continue to do so in the short term but they're not committed to it in the long term. And for fucks sake I haven't been praising them. That's an example of how you oversimplify my argument to fit your narrative, which has been both amusing and frustrating.
That's all you got left.
You don't know what I think about other issues related to the economy and why I would have voted for Mitt.
You, Race, others just use the Rachel Maddow line/liberal bullshit to hide behind an ignorance and discredit my posts. Scare lines like an "anti capitalist agenda"? C'mon man.
It must suck to see the world in left/right agendas.
Checkmate bitch.