Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
55 Million Babies Killed Since Roe v. Wade; 1/3 of a Generation.
Comments
-
You and your Middlebury hookup can't figure out how not to get pregnant? So, I guess you're both not very fucking smart after all.CollegeDoog said:
Some states already have this in the form of 24 hour laws that make certain the female wants to have the abortion.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.dnc said:
Now you're talking.Travis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.
This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.
Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
It shouldn't be a shaming event, however.
Your last two paragraphs make you sound like a douche who wants to control female behavior. People have sex. Deal with it.
-
You are so fucking stupid, it's laughable.death2ducks said:
You and your Middlebury hookup can't figure out how not to get pregnant? So, I guess you're both not very fucking smart after all.CollegeDoog said:
Some states already have this in the form of 24 hour laws that make certain the female wants to have the abortion.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.dnc said:
Now you're talking.Travis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.
This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.
Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
It shouldn't be a shaming event, however.
Your last two paragraphs make you sound like a douche who wants to control female behavior. People have sex. Deal with it. -
It's not murder.death2ducks said:
Over the past 40 years, there have been 150 million births in the US and 55 million abortions. Roe v. Wade was 1974, 10 years after the introduction of the pill. For 40 years, 1 abortion for every 3 births. That's birth control by abortion. That's NOT what we were sold 40 years ago.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.dnc said:
Now you're talking.Travis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.
This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.
Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
Over those 40 years, government didn't pay for those abortions, Planned Parenthood did the biggest number with your tax dollars, however.
The question I have is, what will happen to that ratio now that Obamacare pays for abortion with tax subsidies or pays for the entire thing via Medicaid? Answer, more abortions.
These aren't "accidents". Women don't have to get pregnant. We solved that problem 50 years ago. Now we even have "Plan B". This is murder, and Obama just raised the Murder Rate.
What does the percentage need to rise to? If 50% of pregnancy ends in abortion, will that persuade you that it's murder? With no direct government subsidy for abortion, it's been 25% for the past 40 years. It's now going higher.
Statistics is my "wheelhouse".
Hth -
Your wheelhouse is hating gays, women, and blacks.death2ducks said:
Over the past 40 years, there have been 150 million births in the US and 55 million abortions. Roe v. Wade was 1974, 10 years after the introduction of the pill. For 40 years, 1 abortion for every 3 births. That's birth control by abortion. That's NOT what we were sold 40 years ago.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.dnc said:
Now you're talking.Travis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.
This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.
Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
Over those 40 years, government didn't pay for those abortions, Planned Parenthood did the biggest number with your tax dollars, however.
The question I have is, what will happen to that ratio now that Obamacare pays for abortion with tax subsidies or pays for the entire thing via Medicaid? Answer, more abortions.
These aren't "accidents". Women don't have to get pregnant. We solved that problem 50 years ago. Now we even have "Plan B". This is murder, and Obama just raised the Murder Rate.
What does the percentage need to rise to? If 50% of pregnancy ends in abortion, will that persuade you that it's murder? With no direct government subsidy for abortion, it's been 25% for the past 40 years. It's now going higher.
Statistics is my "wheelhouse".
Hth -
CollegeDoog said:
Your wheelhouse is hating gays, women, and blacks.death2ducks said:
Over the past 40 years, there have been 150 million births in the US and 55 million abortions. Roe v. Wade was 1974, 10 years after the introduction of the pill. For 40 years, 1 abortion for every 3 births. That's birth control by abortion. That's NOT what we were sold 40 years ago.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.dnc said:
Now you're talking.Travis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.
This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.
Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
Over those 40 years, government didn't pay for those abortions, Planned Parenthood did the biggest number with your tax dollars, however.
The question I have is, what will happen to that ratio now that Obamacare pays for abortion with tax subsidies or pays for the entire thing via Medicaid? Answer, more abortions.
These aren't "accidents". Women don't have to get pregnant. We solved that problem 50 years ago. Now we even have "Plan B". This is murder, and Obama just raised the Murder Rate.
What does the percentage need to rise to? If 50% of pregnancy ends in abortion, will that persuade you that it's murder? With no direct government subsidy for abortion, it's been 25% for the past 40 years. It's now going higher.
Statistics is my "wheelhouse".
Hth
-
What's a wheelhouse, some kind of factory?
-
Can't we get back to talking about climate change?
-
This thread makes me wonder why I ever venture to the general board.
-
I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
-
When you get your drivers licenseTravis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
